Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
monopods 
Author Message
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:37 pm
Posts: 835
Location: North Wales UK
Reply with quote
I haven't got a monopod and I've never used one. Although I have scanned the Internet, I can't find good solid advice on choosing one. I know that they are relatively simple and even the Manfrotto ones are not too expensive at all, so what sort of price range is fair for a monopod? Do you get more for your money for the dearer ones, or are they simply lighter for example?

Adding the cost of a head can significantly increase the cost, so this is an excellent buy. Clicky

Does anyone have any thoughts- the less obvious things that you've learnt from experience?

_________________
My lowest spec operational system- AT desktop case, 200W AT PSU, Jetway TX98B Socket 7, Intel Pentium 75Mhz, 2x16MB EDO RAM, 270MB Quantum Maverick HDD, ATI Rage II+ graphics, Soundblaster 16 CT2230, MS-DOS/Win 3.11

My Flickr


Mon Jun 08, 2009 8:26 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:14 pm
Posts: 1598
Location: Right here...... Right now.......
Reply with quote
This would be ok for a compact camera or similar. If you've got a DSLR, especially with a grip then add a hefty lens (28-135 eg), would you trust that free head you get with the monopod?

I've got this (clicky) and the Manfrotto 488RC2 ball head but there again I've got a 100-400 L IS lens to consider as well as the camera and grip.

Al

_________________
Eternally optimistic in a 'glass half empty' sort of way....


Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:57 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 5288
Location: ln -s /London ~
Reply with quote
I bolt my camera straight onto the top of one of these

Edd

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
Gay sex is better than no sex

timark_uk wrote:
Edward Armitage is Awesome. Yes, that's right. Awesome with a A.


Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:06 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:37 pm
Posts: 835
Location: North Wales UK
Reply with quote
onemac wrote:
This would be ok for a compact camera or similar. If you've got a DSLR, especially with a grip then add a hefty lens (28-135 eg), would you trust that free head you get with the monopod?


There's an excellent point. The monopod is rated at 10kg, but now I've found the head specs, it is only rated at 2.5kg

Ruling out the free head, I can start looking at different models.

_________________
My lowest spec operational system- AT desktop case, 200W AT PSU, Jetway TX98B Socket 7, Intel Pentium 75Mhz, 2x16MB EDO RAM, 270MB Quantum Maverick HDD, ATI Rage II+ graphics, Soundblaster 16 CT2230, MS-DOS/Win 3.11

My Flickr


Tue Jun 09, 2009 7:19 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
It weighs a bit more, but you could use a normal tripod with just one leg extended. ;)

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:55 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
I noticed at the weekend that one of the photo magazines is giving a Manfrotto monopod away to new subscribers. I didnt look into it though so thats as much as I know.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:38 am
Profile WWW
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 1757
Location: Cardiff, Wales
Reply with quote
I already have a manfrotto tripod, so a manfrotto monopod would be the obvious choice as I can use the same head. If you have a tripod with a detachable head, may be worth seeing what the manufacturer does in single-legged versions...

_________________
G.


Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:10 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
I have a Giotto/Manfrotto head/tripod combination (can't remember which is which) so there should be a decent amount of cross compatability. Then again for all I know they could be the same company, but at the end of the day if they are functional, compatable and value then that ticks all of my boxes.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:49 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am
Posts: 6954
Location: Peebo
Reply with quote
Provided they use standard 3/8" or 1/4" threads (I think they are the correct standard thread sizes) it shouldn't matter which combination of head and tri/monopod you have.
Some manufacturers may provide a few extra bells and whistles if you pair up their own kit but general compatibility shouldn't be affected.

As an aside, what do you use a monopod for (as opposed to a tripod)?
I can it being useful to gain height or see over a wall (using a remote release of some sort). Is that it or are there numerous other uses I'm missing here?

_________________
When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum.
-Billy Connolly (to a heckler)


Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:00 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 5288
Location: ln -s /London ~
Reply with quote
davrosG5 wrote:
I can it being useful to gain height or see over a wall (using a remote release of some sort). Is that it or are there numerous other uses I'm missing here?

Stability when portability is an issue, or when you need to move whilst taking the shot. Panning during motorsports events, for example.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
Gay sex is better than no sex

timark_uk wrote:
Edward Armitage is Awesome. Yes, that's right. Awesome with a A.


Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:05 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
EddArmitage wrote:
davrosG5 wrote:
I can it being useful to gain height or see over a wall (using a remote release of some sort). Is that it or are there numerous other uses I'm missing here?

Stability when portability is an issue, or when you need to move whilst taking the shot. Panning during motorsports events, for example.


I've seen a few museums and galleries that say tripods are not allowed to be used. Using a monopod and therefore less floor area, you could get around the ban and still have the stability for no flash photography that these buildings also require.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:20 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
You might want to try this:

http://www.instructables.com/id/String-Tripod/

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Tue Mar 23, 2010 6:49 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 12 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.