Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Filters - A hopefully simple question. 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am
Posts: 7935
Location: Manchester.
Reply with quote
OK, so I've got the Nikon D90, and will hopefully be going to Lichfield for a few days, probably at the end of next week.

Whilst there, I'm going to try and get out and take some landscapes, and hopefully some dusk&dawn type horizon(ny) type things.

I'm thinking about bringing out the reds and purples in the sky, or adding a bit more blue... Also, I've just realised that I'm not very good at explaining some things, so the question is...

Do I need filters and which would you guys and gals recommend?

_________________
okenobi wrote:
John's hot. No denying it. But he's hardly Karen now, is he ;)

John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker :P
Sorry :roll:
I'll behave now.
Promise ;)


Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:48 pm
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
John_Vella wrote:
Do I need filters
Need? No. You can take perfectly good and inspiring images without the use of any sort of filters.
However, if you want to use filters then that's entirely your choice. You might find that using different white balance settings in the camera will give you varying degrees of success in what you want from your images.
There's nothing wrong at all in using filters, so please don't think I'm having a go at you, because I'm certainly not. I'm just saying that you can get great images without the use of them.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:42 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
If you do go the filter route then make sure you choose a large size holder/filters and then get a step-up adaptor for your current lens.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Mon Mar 29, 2010 5:13 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 292
Location: UK
Reply with quote
If you set your camera to 'daylight' white balance, then you'll probably find that the sunset colours are vivid enough on their own, without any tweaking. However if you do want to darken the sky, a good circular polariser will do nicely (don't get a linear one as it messes up your AF).

_________________
New site - shop now open!

Image


Mon Mar 29, 2010 5:27 pm
Profile WWW
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
Interesting thought: If you leave your camera set to auto white balance, and to stick a coloured filter on the lens, does the camera compensate for the colour?

I'm like Mark. I don't use filters, apart from a polariser and some neutral density things.

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Mon Mar 29, 2010 7:22 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 292
Location: UK
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
Interesting thought: If you leave your camera set to auto white balance, and to stick a coloured filter on the lens, does the camera compensate for the colour?

Depends how strong the filter is. If it filters out several wavelengths completely, the camera won't be able to compensate and the picture will look odd. If it just tints the picture, it should be able to compensate.

_________________
New site - shop now open!

Image


Mon Mar 29, 2010 8:35 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am
Posts: 7935
Location: Manchester.
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
Need? No. You can take perfectly good and inspiring images without the use of any sort of filters.
However, if you want to use filters then that's entirely your choice. You might find that using different white balance settings in the camera will give you varying degrees of success in what you want from your images.
There's nothing wrong at all in using filters, so please don't think I'm having a go at you, because I'm certainly not. I'm just saying that you can get great images without the use of them.

Mark


No danger of that Mark. If I ask a question here, I expect an honest answer, which is what I always get.

HeatherKay wrote:
I'm like Mark. I don't use filters, apart from a polariser and some neutral density things.


I popped into the camera shop after posting this, and the nice man there said much the same as you Heather.

Lichfield isn't a million miles away so I'll follow your advice and see how it goes.

Thanks for all of the replies and advice everyone. I'm sure there will be many more questions, as I get to know the new one.

:D

_________________
okenobi wrote:
John's hot. No denying it. But he's hardly Karen now, is he ;)

John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker :P
Sorry :roll:
I'll behave now.
Promise ;)


Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:48 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
You might want to try ND Grads to balance the difference in exposure between the sky and the ground. Without going to the expense of pro-grade Lee/Cokin Filters you could get a cheaper version e.g. Kood. They do the common square P size (84mm) and Z-Pro size (100mm). Coloured grads are also available if you want to be creative with colour.

P Type

Cokin P Series

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Tue Mar 30, 2010 9:25 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am
Posts: 7935
Location: Manchester.
Reply with quote
Assuming I get paid tomorrow, (and obviously if I get my bonus that would be a... bonus :? ) I'll pop into Jacobs at lunchtime, as there prices seem quite good and, more importantly, the guys there seem to know what they are talking about and won't try and sell you the most expecsive kit, or try and rush you out of the door.

_________________
okenobi wrote:
John's hot. No denying it. But he's hardly Karen now, is he ;)

John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker :P
Sorry :roll:
I'll behave now.
Promise ;)


Tue Mar 30, 2010 9:35 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
John_Vella wrote:
Assuming I get paid tomorrow, (and obviously if I get my bonus that would be a... bonus :? ) I'll pop into Jacobs at lunchtime, as there prices seem quite good and, more importantly, the guys there seem to know what they are talking about and won't try and sell you the most expecsive kit, or try and rush you out of the door.


I was told I could get an HDMI lead for my WB500 by Jacobs. You cant. It doesnt support HDMI out. I'm not saying that represents Jacobs as a whole, and was obviously just an error by one sales rep, but I've always found Calumet better.

If anything I try to do as much research as possible and buy off t'internet.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Tue Mar 30, 2010 10:07 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 5288
Location: ln -s /London ~
Reply with quote
John_Vella wrote:
I'll pop into Jacobs at lunchtime, as there prices seem quite good and, more importantly, the guys there seem to know what they are talking about and won't try and sell you the most expecsive kit, or try and rush you out of the door.

Going off-topic just a little bit, it's good to know the Leicester stores aren't a one-off.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
Gay sex is better than no sex

timark_uk wrote:
Edward Armitage is Awesome. Yes, that's right. Awesome with a A.


Tue Mar 30, 2010 10:20 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 11 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.