Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
I accidentally a 50mm f1.7 
Author Message
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 4876
Location: Newcastle
Reply with quote
Woops ;)

Ordered one tonight, not going to have a huge amount of money due to moving to a new place (car insurance will be shooting up :( among other extra costs) so figured I'll get one while I have a bit of extra cash to splash

Went for a Minolta 50mm F1.7, I was looking at the Sony version, but it was £20 more at least and was slower and didn't seem to have as good reviews, ended up spending £80 inc delivery (I know some go for £70ish, but it's from an actual camera shop and comes with both caps which can be a pain to get separately)

Can't wait to try it out with some proper manual focussing :)

_________________
Twitter
Charlie Brooker:
Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.


Sun Apr 03, 2011 10:39 pm
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
finlay666 wrote:
Can't wait to try it out with some proper manual focussing :)


Looking forward to seeing the results, too. :)

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:08 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
Nice one fella.

Talking about manual focusing I dont do it all that often and sometimes when I do I end up with a less than pin sharp photo. The thing is though my first ever DSLR (Pentax P30T) was manual only. I got on with that fine so I wonder what the difference is. I'm thinking maybe the focusing screen. I liked those split view jobbies (technical name ;) ) and am sure I'd use manual more if I had one on the DSLR.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Mon Apr 04, 2011 9:41 am
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
I hope you like your f/1.7 as much as I like my f/1.4.
(8+)

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Mon Apr 04, 2011 12:26 pm
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 4876
Location: Newcastle
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
I hope you like your f/1.7 as much as I like my f/1.4.
(8+)

Mark


If I like it I might be tempted to pick up a f/1.2 :P (Minolta had an old MD Rokkor lens that can be adapted apparently, the f/1.4 is pretty cheap just a case of being inclined when I have more money to try out other lenses with adapters)

_________________
Twitter
Charlie Brooker:
Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.


Mon Apr 04, 2011 12:43 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
finlay666 wrote:
the f/1.4 is pretty cheap
Lucky for you! (8+p

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Mon Apr 04, 2011 12:51 pm
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 4876
Location: Newcastle
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
finlay666 wrote:
the f/1.4 is pretty cheap
Lucky for you! (8+p

Mark


Minolta Rokkor f/1.4 is about £50 with the cost of the adapter kit on top judging by ebay prices, a f/1.2 is about £500 for a good quality one as it's apparently very rare http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Minolta-MD-Rokkor ... 5d2e280f03
The AF 1.4 is closer to £150 used, and around £300 new from memory, don't think they do a faster one without getting into the uber money

That said if someone offered me one of these I wouldnt say no:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Leica-NOCTILUX-M- ... 35b0f754e2

_________________
Twitter
Charlie Brooker:
Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.


Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:41 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 4876
Location: Newcastle
Reply with quote
It arrived while I was at Tescos getting lunch :D

Image

_________________
Twitter
Charlie Brooker:
Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.


Thu Apr 07, 2011 3:13 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 4876
Location: Newcastle
Reply with quote
Image fail....

http://twitpic.com/4hx88w

Will try to get some photos over the weekend, been pretty busy past couple of days trying to get bits sorted for moving house in a couple of weeks

_________________
Twitter
Charlie Brooker:
Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.


Fri Apr 08, 2011 11:23 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Scotland
Reply with quote
anyone remember I bitched how I hated my F1.4 50mm? im quite liking it now I guess :(

_________________
Image


Sat Apr 09, 2011 5:24 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
brataccas wrote:
anyone remember I bitched how I hated my F1.4 50mm?
Yes. It puzzled me then and it puzzled me even more after I got my one.
What's changed your opinion on it now?

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Apr 09, 2011 5:36 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Scotland
Reply with quote
image quality is outstanding compared to my tamron 17-50 which is now just a 17 as its half broken :(

and can work out where it would work well etc now

_________________
Image


Sun Apr 10, 2011 10:29 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 12 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.