Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
S95 
Author Message
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
Post S95
Has anybody got one of these? Or any of the other "good" compacts? Care to share your experiences and some pics?

I need something to take away with me, but it HAS to be pocketable, or I won't use it.


Sat Jan 29, 2011 4:25 pm
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
Is that the Canon thingy?

If so, Batman used to have one. Very nice little camera.

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Sat Jan 29, 2011 4:57 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
Have a look at the Lumix LX5 too. A few reviews suggest the S95 has the edge on IQ but you get a bit more on the wide end (24 versus 28mm), faster lens (f2-3.3 versus f2-4.9), faster maximum shutter speed (1/4000 versus 1/1600) and more shots per charge (400 versus 200). There really isnt a great deal in it I guess.

Samsung also have the EX1 with an f1.8 lens and built like a tank http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/ ... onclusion/ - but no video mode

Olympus have a fast f1.8 compact too - XZ-1http://www.pocket-lint.com/review/5219/olympus-xz-1-camera-review - looks interesting and a bit sexy

Sigma DP2 and Ricoh GR Digital III also come to mind

I guess there's the Canon G12 and Nikon P7000 but they're not as pocketable as those above.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Sat Jan 29, 2011 6:33 pm
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
Is that the Canon thingy?

If so, Batman used to have one. Very nice little camera.


It is. And so I'm hearing. I was hoping one of you nerds might have something pocketable that you carry around with you when you don't want all your nerdy gear.

veato wrote:
Have a look at the Lumix LX5 too. A few reviews suggest the S95 has the edge on IQ but you get a bit more on the wide end (24 versus 28mm), faster lens (f2-3.3 versus f2-4.9), faster maximum shutter speed (1/4000 versus 1/1600) and more shots per charge (400 versus 200). There really isnt a great deal in it I guess.

Samsung also have the EX1 with an f1.8 lens and built like a tank http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/ ... onclusion/ - but no video mode

Olympus have a fast f1.8 compact too - XZ-1http://www.pocket-lint.com/review/5219/olympus-xz-1-camera-review - looks interesting and a bit sexy

Sigma DP2 and Ricoh GR Digital III also come to mind

I guess there's the Canon G12 and Nikon P7000 but they're not as pocketable as those above.


Yeah, looked at the others, but EVERYTHING is bigger than the 95. I'm not sure just how "pocketable" even an LX5 is. The EX1 is bigger again. Also, I don't really have £400 to spend. I'm hoping to get an eBay/refurb/EOL bargain or something. There's no doubting the performance of any of them, but I want something I can have with me at all times and that's likely to mean trouser/shorts/shirt pocket, rather than coat (especially being as I won't be needing a coat for at least 6mths :) )


Sun Jan 30, 2011 5:54 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
HeatherKay wrote:
Is that the Canon thingy?

If so, Batman used to have one. Very nice little camera.


It is. And so I'm hearing. I was hoping one of you nerds might have something pocketable that you carry around with you when you don't want all your nerdy gear.


I think quite a few of us do.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:33 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
okenobi wrote:
HeatherKay wrote:
Is that the Canon thingy?

If so, Batman used to have one. Very nice little camera.


It is. And so I'm hearing. I was hoping one of you nerds might have something pocketable that you carry around with you when you don't want all your nerdy gear.


I think quite a few of us do.


So what is it, what kind of shots do you use it for, and what do you think of it.....?


Mon Jan 31, 2011 9:10 am
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
I have a Canon G9. It's pocketable, if your pockets are large.

I bought it as a carry-around camera. It has all the pro-level features I want, such as RAW, full manual control and support for the full range of Speedlites (not that I use external flash units). I carry it around in my handbag most places I go. It also has a use in the scale model stuff I do, in that I can stand it on a model railway to get a shot simply impossible to do with the DSLR.

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Mon Jan 31, 2011 9:15 am
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
I have a Canon G9. It's pocketable, if your pockets are large.

I bought it as a carry-around camera. It has all the pro-level features I want, such as RAW, full manual control and support for the full range of Speedlites (not that I use external flash units). I carry it around in my handbag most places I go. It also has a use in the scale model stuff I do, in that I can stand it on a model railway to get a shot simply impossible to do with the DSLR.


Jeans pocket, do you reckon, Heather? Or handbags only really?


Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:02 am
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
Jeans pocket, do you reckon, Heather? Or handbags only really?


Baggy jeans, yes. You know you're carrying it about, that's for sure.

The S95, though, is entirely a jeans pocket camera, and has many of the features the G9 has.

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:06 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
So what is it, what kind of shots do you use it for, and what do you think of it.....?


My compact is a Leica D-Lux 4, which gives me a lot of control over shutter, aperture, etc.. Here are a couple of sets of photos I have taken with it:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/hairydalek ... 064207955/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/hairydalek ... 541381945/

I like it - it’s a nicely built camera.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:44 am
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
Ok, cool. Thanks.

Could I possibly trouble you for an example shot of the same subject from both the w and t extremes, so I can gauge the range on offer?

I think that might be my sticking point on these bigger sensor, "better" compacts.


Mon Jan 31, 2011 2:41 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
Ok, cool. Thanks.

Could I possibly trouble you for an example shot of the same subject from both the w and t extremes, so I can gauge the range on offer?

I think that might be my sticking point on these bigger sensor, "better" compacts.


If you need more range the TZ series is about to get an update (or may be out already?). The TZ7 (mine) was one of the best travel compacts at the time and was replaced by the TZ10 a while back. This has now been replaced by the TZ20 which I think (from the top of my head) offers 16x zoom and Full HD movies.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Mon Jan 31, 2011 2:55 pm
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
veato wrote:
okenobi wrote:
Ok, cool. Thanks.

Could I possibly trouble you for an example shot of the same subject from both the w and t extremes, so I can gauge the range on offer?

I think that might be my sticking point on these bigger sensor, "better" compacts.


If you need more range the TZ series is about to get an update (or may be out already?). The TZ7 (mine) was one of the best travel compacts at the time and was replaced by the TZ10 a while back. This has now been replaced by the TZ20 which I think (from the top of my head) offers 16x zoom and Full HD movies.


But the sensor is half the size of the afforementioned models and the lens are way slower.

If somebody made something halfway, I'd bite their hand off. But they don't and I'm trying to get a handle on whether or not I could live with something more "pro" without the zoom range.


Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:19 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:

But the sensor is half the size of the afforementioned models and the lens are way slower.

If somebody made something halfway, I'd bite their hand off. But they don't and I'm trying to get a handle on whether or not I could live with something more "pro" without the zoom range.


In that case I wonder if a CSC would be the best option? Something like a Samsung NX100 is compact (ish) especially when fitted with a 20mm f/2.0 pancake and has an APS-C sized sensor. Then when you want to get a bit more zoomy you can pop a 50-200mm on although lose some of the compactness of course. You can even get a K mount adapter which opens the doors to a massive back catalogue of lenses.

The Olympus PEN and Lumix GF1/2 are other similar cameras but (IIRC especially where the Lumix is concerned) the lenses are more expensive.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:55 am
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
veato wrote:
okenobi wrote:

But the sensor is half the size of the afforementioned models and the lens are way slower.

If somebody made something halfway, I'd bite their hand off. But they don't and I'm trying to get a handle on whether or not I could live with something more "pro" without the zoom range.


In that case I wonder if a CSC would be the best option? Something like a Samsung NX100 is compact (ish) especially when fitted with a 20mm f/2.0 pancake and has an APS-C sized sensor. Then when you want to get a bit more zoomy you can pop a 50-200mm on although lose some of the compactness of course. You can even get a K mount adapter which opens the doors to a massive back catalogue of lenses.

The Olympus PEN and Lumix GF1/2 are other similar cameras but (IIRC especially where the Lumix is concerned) the lenses are more expensive.


Thanks for that, I did a lot of reading around this yesterday and was amazed to see how expensive lenses are. Even the Samsung stuff. Then there's the fact that only the pancake lenses are fast. As you move to bigger things they get almost as slow as a travel zoom compact. The more I looked into it, the more I realised this new system isn't targeted at me. It's targeted at people who want a DSLR, but smaller. I don't want to carry multiple lenses. They're big and expensive and just having the body shrunk isn't enough. I think an all-in-solution it has to be.

Gonna go look into the G12 and LX3/5 in addition to the S95...


Wed Feb 02, 2011 11:18 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.