Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Sigma Announces '46 million pixel' SD1 
Author Message
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
This is something I hadn't really considered before; super high pixel count in APS-C sized sensor cameras.
Also, in a move away from current industry trends, Sigma has switched the storage medium of this camera to Compact Flash from the SD type cards used previously.
No mention of price yet, or the ISO capabilities of the camera, but this is looking like a winner of a camera if the price is reasonable.
DPreview preview

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Thu Sep 23, 2010 11:44 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
I really like it. When compared to conventional sensors you could say it's 15mp as it produces 4800x3200 images put each of those pixels captures a seperate R, G and B value (dont quote me, I think that's how it works) hence the 45-or-whatever-it-is megapixel.

I'm interested to see how it performs in tests. I did hear it will be around 7D money but without extras like HD video I guess it's going to have to do something special stills wise.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Thu Sep 23, 2010 1:07 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
In other news I've seen some specs for the Pentax K-5.

WANT!

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Thu Sep 23, 2010 1:08 pm
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
There's a very rough price of around £1,800-2,000 in the UK for the SD1.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Fri Sep 24, 2010 12:13 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
There's a very rough price of around £1,800-2,000 in the UK for the SD1.

Mark


Isn't that more than 5D body money? (or whatever the inferior Nikon model is)

It's going to have to be good at that price!

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:34 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
veato wrote:
or whatever the inferior Nikon model is


<thinks>........why is Mark not biting. The bait is on the hook.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:43 pm
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
veato wrote:
timark_uk wrote:
There's a very rough price of around £1,800-2,000 in the UK for the SD1.
Isn't that more than 5D body money? (or whatever the inferior Nikon model is)
Warehouse Express prices …
Canon 5D MkII (body only) … £1674
Nikon D700 (body only) … £1763
In terms of megapixels the Sony A900 comes closest (for a 35mm DSLR) at a body only cost of £1799.
So yes, the SD1 would have to be something spectacular to be commanding a £2k price tag (if that is indeed what it ends up retailing at).

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Fri Sep 24, 2010 2:09 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am
Posts: 7935
Location: Manchester.
Reply with quote
veato wrote:
veato wrote:
or whatever the inferior Nikon model is


<thinks>........why is Mark not biting. The bait is on the hook.


Would you mind letting us know which Nikon model you're referring to, and why you believe it to be inferior?

</Not biting, just askin'>

_________________
okenobi wrote:
John's hot. No denying it. But he's hardly Karen now, is he ;)

John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker :P
Sorry :roll:
I'll behave now.
Promise ;)


Fri Sep 24, 2010 3:33 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
John_Vella wrote:
veato wrote:
veato wrote:
or whatever the inferior Nikon model is


<thinks>........why is Mark not biting. The bait is on the hook.


Would you mind letting us know which Nikon model you're referring to, and why you believe it to be inferior?

</Not biting, just askin'>


None. If anything I prefer Nikon.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Sat Sep 25, 2010 9:29 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 9 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.