Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
My Wife...... and Photography 
Author Message
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:14 pm
Posts: 1598
Location: Right here...... Right now.......
Reply with quote
Well, it would appear that the wife has decided I should get a new camera :D My immediate thoughts were the 7D or 5D MkII (will stick to Canon due to 3 existing lenses). I might just scrape in a new lens as well - in for a penny and all that?
So Heather - how's that 7D coming along? Any problems (like focus issues or back/front focussing)?

Unfortunately I'm not authorised to get a 300mm F/2.8 prime so might look at the new 70-200 F/2.8 but can't quite choose whether to get the IS version or not. 1.4x convertor has to be standard but can't use it with my 100-400 :evil: . Other options are 300mm F/4 or the 400mm F5.6 (again with convertor).?

So, what camera and lens do you suggest? Over to you......

Al

_________________
Eternally optimistic in a 'glass half empty' sort of way....


Wed Apr 13, 2011 10:02 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Full frame, or are you limited with your current lenses?

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Wed Apr 13, 2011 10:20 am
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
Sweet!

The 7D is fab. No issues beyond operator error that I can see. I thought my cheapie Sigma 28-300 might have had a focus issue, but it was just me being in numpty mode, trying to use too many of the 19 AF points at once. :lol:

I'd say, if you can swing it and all of your lenses are full frame compatibale (a lot of mine aren't yet), then go for the 5D if you can. Mr Miners has one, and seems to take some reasonable shots with his. ;) :) The rumour mills are claiming a 5D MkIII isn't too far away, but what with the goings on in Japan right now that might be delayed a bit longer.

The same rumour mills are muttering about a 7D MkII.

I'm very happy with the new camera. It's taken me a while to learn my way around it, which has required the purchase of a decent book to supplement the Canon manual, but I think it has a long and fruitful career ahead of it in my hands.

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Wed Apr 13, 2011 12:28 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
Full frame, or are you limited with your current lenses?
Very pertinent question as the 7D is crop but the 5D MkII is full. If the latter was really considered then I suspect the existing lenses would all be compatible. Still, would be good to know. (8+)

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Wed Apr 13, 2011 12:30 pm
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
I'd say, if you can swing it and all of your lenses are full frame compatibale (a lot of mine aren't yet), then go for the 5D if you can. Mr Miners has one,
Just for clarity, Nick has a 5D MkII, but you knew that, right?
(8+)

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Wed Apr 13, 2011 12:33 pm
Profile WWW
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
Just for clarity, Nick has a 5D MkII, but you knew that, right?


I did, yes. I sort of assumed the full model name wasn't really necessary in this instance. :geek:

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Wed Apr 13, 2011 12:35 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
timark_uk wrote:
Just for clarity, Nick has a 5D MkII, but you knew that, right?
I did, yes. I sort of assumed the full model name wasn't really necessary in this instance. :geek:
Well, could the 5D not also be an option?
I thought so. Al?

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Wed Apr 13, 2011 12:41 pm
Profile WWW
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
I thought so. Al?


I thought I was the pedantic one. :lol:

The 5D hasn't been in production for nearly three years now? It still comes up second-hand, I'll give you that, but one generally assumes 5D MkII in conversation, especially if it was referred to in the OP.

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Wed Apr 13, 2011 12:54 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:14 pm
Posts: 1598
Location: Right here...... Right now.......
Reply with quote
The 5D2 is top of my list. My main lens (100-400) is compatible as is the 17-85mm. My 28-135 is an EF mount as well so I think it's ok but not sure. Any of the 'wish list' lenses are ok and if I get the 70-200 then I'll sell the 28-135 anyway.

My only niggle is the 3.9fps of the 5D as opposed to 8 from the 7D. Focus is slower too. So we're talking about 3 Mega Pixels/slower focus/fps and almost £500 of a difference in price. Bear in mind that my main photography genre is aviation and you can see why the 7D would suit better.

Oh, and I do like close-up shots.

Al

_________________
Eternally optimistic in a 'glass half empty' sort of way....


Wed Apr 13, 2011 1:23 pm
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
EF mounts would be fine on the 5D [MkII] - it's anything designed for the APS-C cameras that aren't, so EF-S and whatever Sigma/Tokina/Tamron use to signify their lenses.

Sounds like the 7D would be better for you. The multi-shot drive is scary the first time you fire off 15 frames in a couple of seconds!

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Wed Apr 13, 2011 1:27 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
Sounds like the 7D would be better for you.
It does look like it's going that way to me too.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Wed Apr 13, 2011 1:37 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Yeah, pointless thread really. ;)

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Wed Apr 13, 2011 1:42 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 12 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.