x404.co.uk
http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/

Winner of Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2009
http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=3572
Page 1 of 2

Author:  nvj1662 [ Thu Oct 22, 2009 12:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Winner of Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2009

An impressive picture wins this year.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/earth/hi/earth_news/newsid_8318000/8318226.stm
That new dog food works wonders! ;)

Author:  paulzolo [ Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Winner of Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2009

That is an incredible picture, but it has qualities that make me want to shout “Photoshop”!

Author:  veato [ Tue Dec 22, 2009 9:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Winner of Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2009

Its now suggested the animal was tame and the entry could be withdrawn

Author:  nickminers [ Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Winner of Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2009

I heard that too. I hope it's not true - it would spoil one of my favourite photo competitions.

Author:  gavomatic57 [ Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Winner of Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2009

Clicky

Seems too good to be true to me too. Wolves are pack animals with an acute sense of smell - they'd be onto him in their numbers or they'd be staying the hell away I'm sure. Mind you, I'm no wolf expert.

Author:  nvj1662 [ Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Winner of Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2009

The winner of the Wildlife Photographer of the Year award has been disqualified after judges ruled that the featured wolf was probably a "model".

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8470962.stm

Mark Carwardine [Judge] wrote:
Mr Carwardine explained that he and his fellow judges had gathered evidence and sought the opinions of wolf experts in order to reach their decision.

The experts compared the winning picture to pictures of Ossian, a tame wolf that lives at a zoological park near Madrid called Canada Real.

"You can see several very distinctive markings and the experts all agreed that, yes, it's the same wolf," said Mr Carwardine.

"We disqualified [Mr Rodriguez] and banned him for life from entering the competition again, so I think that sends a strong message."

Mr Carwardine added that Mr Rodruiguez had, throughout the investigation, denied "hiring" Ossian for the photograph. The disqualified photographer maintains that his subject was a wild wolf.

Author:  EddArmitage [ Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Winner of Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2009

Oh dear - I think this is now the third thread mentioning this (Two were created by the same person!)

Author:  Linux_User [ Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Winner of Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2009

EddArmitage wrote:
Oh dear - I think this is now the third thread mentioning this (Two were created by the same person!)


Indeed, since many people don't enter some sub-forums.

Author:  ProfessorF [ Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Winner of Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2009

gavomatic57 wrote:
Clicky

Seems too good to be true to me too. Wolves are pack animals with an acute sense of smell - they'd be onto him in their numbers or they'd be staying the hell away I'm sure. Mind you, I'm no wolf expert.


He wasn't stood there taking the picture, was he? Wasn't it done with a remote trip (allegedly)? :?
Genuine question. :)

Author:  Fogmeister [ Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:58 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Winner of Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2009

ProfessorF wrote:
He wasn't stood there taking the picture, was he? Wasn't it done with a remote trip (allegedly)? :?
Genuine question. :)

He said he had trip beams and triggers set up.

Although that could also be a lie?

One thing to be said though, whether it was a cheated shot with a tame wolf or not, it's still a cracking photo.

Author:  EddArmitage [ Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:04 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Winner of Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2009

Fogmeister wrote:
One thing to be said though, whether it was a cheated shot with a tame wolf or not, it's still a cracking photo.

As I said in another thread, that's the saddest thing about it. The photo's been tarnished, in effect.

Author:  nvj1662 [ Fri Jan 22, 2010 1:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Winner of Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2009

EddArmitage wrote:
Fogmeister wrote:
One thing to be said though, whether it was a cheated shot with a tame wolf or not, it's still a cracking photo.

As I said in another thread, that's the saddest thing about it. The photo's been tarnished, in effect.


It was just entered into the wrong competition; it was meant for the Tamelife Photographer of the Year
were it would be a good picture again.

Author:  EddArmitage [ Fri Jan 22, 2010 6:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Winner of Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2009

nvj1662 wrote:
EddArmitage wrote:
Fogmeister wrote:
One thing to be said though, whether it was a cheated shot with a tame wolf or not, it's still a cracking photo.

As I said in another thread, that's the saddest thing about it. The photo's been tarnished, in effect.


It was just entered into the wrong competition; it was meant for the Tamelife Photographer of the Year
were it would be a good picture again.

I know. But people who look at that now think of how it's not as impressive as it was made out to be, and think of the negatives.

Author:  nickminers [ Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Winner of Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2009

EddArmitage wrote:
and think of the negatives.

Wasn't it shot on digital?

Author:  EddArmitage [ Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Winner of Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2009

nickminers wrote:
EddArmitage wrote:
and think of the negatives.

Wasn't it shot on digital?

(8-p) A bloody expensive digital at that!

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/