Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Copyright: time to change the laws? 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Copyright: time to change the laws?

Just a discussion culminating in an opt in system suggestion.

Quote:
"It would be better if the photographer registered any image be wanted to protect with an online registration system," he says, "and that any other work was in the public domain."


Oh, and a no brainer.

Quote:
If Shakespeare was still in copyright less of his work would be seen



My thoughts are that the user should seek permission rather than the owner seeking protection.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Tue May 18, 2010 6:58 am
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
In the US, the onus is on the artist to register their works with the authorities. That's the opposite of how it works over here, where copyright is assumed.

Not sure I want the hassle, but if it ends up protecting the rights of the creator, then that's the way it has to be.

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Tue May 18, 2010 7:42 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 5288
Location: ln -s /London ~
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
Not sure I want the hassle, but if it ends up protecting the rights of the creator, then that's the way it has to be.

For me it's not the hassle, but the cost. It's ~35USD for each set of images you want protecting in the states, non?

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
Gay sex is better than no sex

timark_uk wrote:
Edward Armitage is Awesome. Yes, that's right. Awesome with a A.


Tue May 18, 2010 8:18 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
I thought our rights were already protected. If they are then why change the system?

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Tue May 18, 2010 8:24 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 5288
Location: ln -s /London ~
Reply with quote
I think the suposed advantage of the US system of having to register copyright is that it's very easily provable in court when someone steals your images.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
Gay sex is better than no sex

timark_uk wrote:
Edward Armitage is Awesome. Yes, that's right. Awesome with a A.


Tue May 18, 2010 8:43 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
I think the period of protection needs to be drastically reduced. 70 years after the death of the creator is way too much.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Wed May 19, 2010 11:57 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Linux_User wrote:
I think the period of protection needs to be drastically reduced. 70 years after the death of the creator is way too much.


Haven't the yanks been pushing to increase that even more? Personally I think 20 after death would be more than suitable, the estate should go out and earn their own money.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Thu May 20, 2010 8:19 pm
Profile
Has a life
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 1:43 pm
Posts: 76
Location: Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland
Reply with quote
I think anyone should be able to use another's images with the appropriate credit included if it is on a not-for-profit basis, that way the images get exposure. However when someone earns money from anothers work then there should be a profit sharing scheme.

_________________
and all of your friends have gone before you, and there are strangers in the seats of the mighty, who do not know you, nor your triumphs, nor your incredible value.


Sun May 23, 2010 9:28 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 292
Location: UK
Reply with quote
wolfie2 wrote:
I think anyone should be able to use another's images with the appropriate credit included if it is on a not-for-profit basis, that way the images get exposure. However when someone earns money from anothers work then there should be a profit sharing scheme.

Don't you think that should be up to the photographer?

_________________
New site - shop now open!

Image


Mon May 24, 2010 6:07 am
Profile WWW
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 6:15 pm
Posts: 175
Reply with quote
IMHO, if I make an image, it belongs to me. I should not be required to go to extra effort and expense (lining somebody else's pocket), to prove it. If somebody else wishes to use that image, they have a reason and will go to some effort to achieve that end. Part of that effort involves contacting me and asking permission, it is after all my image. No third party should be inserting themselves, uninvited, as a middle-man and creaming off profit for nothing.


Wed May 26, 2010 12:34 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
Linux_User wrote:
I think the period of protection needs to be drastically reduced. 70 years after the death of the creator is way too much.


Haven't the yanks been pushing to increase that even more? Personally I think 20 after death would be more than suitable, the estate should go out and earn their own money.


Still too much - death is the latest I'd want to see, but TBH I'd be happy to support a fixed term, such as 25 years (from date of creation).

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Wed May 26, 2010 7:20 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Linux_User wrote:
belchingmatt wrote:
Linux_User wrote:
I think the period of protection needs to be drastically reduced. 70 years after the death of the creator is way too much.


Haven't the yanks been pushing to increase that even more? Personally I think 20 after death would be more than suitable, the estate should go out and earn their own money.


Still too much - death is the latest I'd want to see, but TBH I'd be happy to support a fixed term, such as 25 years (from date of creation).


That would bring it in line with a lot of other patent industries such as pharmaceuticals and engineering. However those are groups and not individuals so I'm not so sure that would be fair. Should we make a deal on death? :lol:

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Wed May 26, 2010 7:24 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 12 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.