Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Photographing Perseids 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:06 pm
Posts: 6355
Location: IoW
Reply with quote
I'm setting up the telescope and tripod ready for tonight, and I'm hoping to capture a few meteors.

In broad strokes can anyone give me a idea of the best settings to use?

As I understand it, 800 ISO, a fast wide lens (hoping the 14-42mm is up to it), a remote shutter release and long exposures seem to be the way forward, but I'm still a camera noob and I don't want to miss out.

I thought a high ISO and long exposure would be a bad idea, as you'd get a lot of noise?

Is the f3.5 14-42mm a better option than the f4 40-150mm?

Any advice would be great.

Cheers

Spreadie

_________________
Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes; after that, who cares?! He's a mile away and you've got his shoes!


Thu Aug 12, 2010 8:02 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Spreadie wrote:
(hoping the 14-42mm is up to it),
It depends on it's aperture. Use your lens wide open, which is what I'd be doing if it wasn't cloudy where I am. I don't know how well your camera deals with image noise so I can't really comment on that.
Tripod, cable release and long exposures are the way to go.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Thu Aug 12, 2010 8:16 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Without a remote shutter release I would be limited to a 30s shutter max. As you would expect to see one perseid every minute that should be enough to capture something with a few attempts. You may also need to account for the Earth's rotation.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Thu Aug 12, 2010 9:03 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:06 pm
Posts: 6355
Location: IoW
Reply with quote
I have remote release - £3 bargain on ebay.

So far, I have set it SH spot metering, which i think should darken the background?
30 sec bulb
ISO 800
3.5 apeture
MF

Oh, and I've taken to swearing every time someone puts a light on in the house.

[edit] clouds!!11one one :evil:

_________________
Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes; after that, who cares?! He's a mile away and you've got his shoes!


Thu Aug 12, 2010 9:20 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Spreadie wrote:
I have remote release - £3 bargain on ebay.

So far, I have set it SH spot metering, which i think should darken the background?
30 sec bulb
ISO 800
3.5 apeture
MF

Oh, and I've taken to swearing every time someone puts a light on in the house.

[edit] clouds!!11one one :evil:


Fuse box! :lol:

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Thu Aug 12, 2010 9:45 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:14 pm
Posts: 1598
Location: Right here...... Right now.......
Reply with quote
Spreadie wrote:
I have remote release - £3 bargain on ebay.

So far, I have set it SH spot metering, which i think should darken the background?
30 sec bulb
ISO 800
3.5 apeture
MF

Oh, and I've taken to swearing every time someone puts a light on in the house.

[edit] clouds!!11one one :evil:

No - stick to ISO100 or lower if you can and amend the exposure time accordingly :D

Just on my way out now to show you all how it's done :? Not sure the cloud will allow me though... :lol:

Al

_________________
Eternally optimistic in a 'glass half empty' sort of way....


Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:25 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 5288
Location: ln -s /London ~
Reply with quote
Why such a wide aperture? I'd instinctively have gone low ISO, narrow aperture, long exposure. It's what I do with fireworks.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
Gay sex is better than no sex

timark_uk wrote:
Edward Armitage is Awesome. Yes, that's right. Awesome with a A.


Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:32 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
EddArmitage wrote:
It's what I do with fireworks.
The light from fireworks is so much more than that from a streak of meteor in the atmosphere. A wider aperture also allows you to get background stars.
I'm only saying what I'd do. A wider aperture also means less exposure time = less grain in the final image.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Fri Aug 13, 2010 9:14 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 5288
Location: ln -s /London ~
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
less grain in the final image.

Like you care about grain/noise! (8-p)

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
Gay sex is better than no sex

timark_uk wrote:
Edward Armitage is Awesome. Yes, that's right. Awesome with a A.


Fri Aug 13, 2010 9:18 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
EddArmitage wrote:
timark_uk wrote:
less grain in the final image.
Like you care about grain/noise! (8-p)
(8+D

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Fri Aug 13, 2010 9:21 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
With a 10-30s exposure on a 600mm lens you can easily see star trails. You'll get sharper images wide and fast.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Fri Aug 13, 2010 11:33 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
a 600mm lens
I'd be using a wide angle lens to cover as much of the sky as possible.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Fri Aug 13, 2010 11:43 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 5288
Location: ln -s /London ~
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
With a 10-30s exposure on a 600mm lens you can easily see star trails. You'll get sharper images wide and fast.

Why sharper when wide? Most lenses seem to have a sweet spot around f/8 -> f/11 -ish. I'm a bit confusled!

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
Gay sex is better than no sex

timark_uk wrote:
Edward Armitage is Awesome. Yes, that's right. Awesome with a A.


Fri Aug 13, 2010 11:51 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:06 pm
Posts: 6355
Location: IoW
Reply with quote
:lol:

Sixty long exposure shots later, and I got one faint meteor on camera (plus a couple of planes trying to get in on the action)

Oh well, it was fun to watch at least.

_________________
Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes; after that, who cares?! He's a mile away and you've got his shoes!


Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:01 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Spreadie wrote:
(plus a couple of planes trying to get in on the action)
Those planes can be sneaky when taking images of the night sky.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:06 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.