Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Ash calls for 5% increase in tobacco tax 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Quote:
A five per cent rise in tobacco tax would lead to a substantial drop in the number of smokers and save millions in health costs, a UK charity suggests.

Such an increase would discourage children from buying cigarettes and help adults quit, a report by Action on Smoking and Health (Ash) says.

Its chief executive, Deborah Arnott, said: "Smoking is a childhood addiction and not an adult choice."

But smokers' rights lobby group Forest said cigarette smugglers would gain.

Director Simon Clark said: "The only people who will benefit from raising tobacco taxation by this amount are the criminal gangs who will smuggle millions of cheap cigarettes into the country from Eastern Europe and elsewhere."

Health benefits

He added that many counterfeit cigarettes would be sold in pubs and on street corners on the black market, costing the Treasury up to £3bn a year.

Support for a five per cent price rise above inflation comes from Cancer Research UK, the British Heart Foundation and the Foundation for the Study of Infant Deaths (FSID).

Ash's report says that raising tobacco prices would reduce the number of smokers by 190,000 and save the NHS more than £20m a year by cutting the cost of treating smoking-related diseases.

It also claims a tax rise would also reduce smoking-related absenteeism in the workplace, saving more than £10m a year.

Supporters also say government tax revenues would be boosted by more than £500m a year and result in wider economic benefits in the first five years of more than £270m a year.

Ash outlines its call on tobacco prices in a pre-Budget submission to the Treasury.

Its head, Ms Arnott, said: "By increasing tobacco taxation, we help to discourage children from buying cigarettes. An above-inflation rise would also help adults stop smoking."

FSID director Joyce Epstein said: "Scientific evidence shows that every year the lives of over 100 UK infants could be saved if no pregnant woman smoked.

"Smoking by fathers increases the risk of infant death as well. Our organisation supports increasing the price of tobacco because it will encourage smokers to consider quitting and so protect their children."


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8553055.stm

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:02 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:20 pm
Posts: 446
Location: ~/
Reply with quote
Awesome. I'm fully in favour of taxes I don't have to pay. :)

_________________
I was nickholway on the old boards.


Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:40 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:46 pm
Posts: 10022
Reply with quote
Imposing higher taxes means fewer people will smoke so less income will be available. The NHS has so much coming through smoking taxes that each smoker has paid the equivalent of private health car for all of their hospital costs.

_________________
Image
He fights for the users.


Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:00 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
It will happen anyway because the government need to raise money. A non issue if ever there was one.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sat Mar 06, 2010 4:33 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:53 pm
Posts: 447
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
cloaked_wolf wrote:
Imposing higher taxes means fewer people will smoke so less income will be available. The NHS has so much coming through smoking taxes that each smoker has paid the equivalent of private health car for all of their hospital costs.

No Cigarettes have an incredibly low price elasticity of demand so if they increase in price by 5% the decrease in quantity demanded will be 1-2% at best.

What you would be assuming is that there is perfect correlation between price and quantity demanded across all products. However cigarettes are addictive so though they can be considered a luxury they are often treated as a necessity, especially since those most addicted to them are the largest consumers and have the least will to quit.
Tobacco duty currently brings in £7.1 billion for the government far outstripping the cost of them to the NHS massively.
More smokers god-damn-it. :twisted:

The problem that the government has primarily is that the profits that can be made from smuggling are starting to make smuggling very attractive. even still the government will still have greater tax revenues.

And that idea of saving £10 million a year for smokers who have breaks is BS. because that's a simple mathmatic trick the media love to use to exaggerate the truth. Cumulative amount of time spent on smoking breaks * average wage/ hour= money lost. Which is just a plain logical fallacy.

On balnce an increase in taxes on cigarettes will increase smuggling however will secure greater revenues for the government.


Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:22 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
eddie543 wrote:
cloaked_wolf wrote:
Imposing higher taxes means fewer people will smoke so less income will be available. The NHS has so much coming through smoking taxes that each smoker has paid the equivalent of private health car for all of their hospital costs.

No Cigarettes have an incredibly low price elasticity of demand so if they increase in price by 5% the decrease in quantity demanded will be 1-2% at best.

What you would be assuming is that there is perfect correlation between price and quantity demanded across all products. However cigarettes are addictive so though they can be considered a luxury they are often treated as a necessity, especially since those most addicted to them are the largest consumers and have the least will to quit.
Tobacco duty currently brings in £7.1 billion for the government far outstripping the cost of them to the NHS massively.
More smokers god-damn-it. :twisted:

The problem that the government has primarily is that the profits that can be made from smuggling are starting to make smuggling very attractive. even still the government will still have greater tax revenues.

And that idea of saving £10 million a year for smokers who have breaks is BS. because that's a simple mathmatic trick the media love to use to exaggerate the truth. Cumulative amount of time spent on smoking breaks * average wage/ hour= money lost. Which is just a plain logical fallacy.

On balnce an increase in taxes on cigarettes will increase smuggling however will secure greater revenues for the government.


2008-2009 tax & vat revenues £10 billion
Lost to counterfeit & smuggling up to £3.7 billion
Prices go up smuggling goes up and even more revenue is lost.
When people give up most of the associated cost when it comes to health care will not be seen for decades

_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:52 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 6 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.