Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Clarkson told to reopen footpath by Isle of Man home 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Quote:
Television presenter Jeremy Clarkson has been ordered to reopen a footpath through his property after a public inquiry on the Isle of Man.

The BBC Top Gear presenter sparked protests from ramblers when he diverted a path on land at his holiday home, a lighthouse on the Langness peninsula.

He claims there had never been any rights of way across the land.

But a public inquiry concluded he interfered with a right of way and he must now reinstate the path.

Mr Clarkson has 28 days to appeal against the ruling.

Health Minister David Anderson MHK, who was acting transport minister at the time the inquiry began, said anyone was able to object to the report's findings.

He said: "If any objections are received, and are not subsequently withdrawn, the matter has to be brought to the High Court for resolution."

'Horrible experiences'

Mr Anderson said the inquiry inspector, Roy Hickey, said "strong and persuasive evidence" had been put forward by members of the public that they had the right to use the paths on Langness.

He said that all of the paths on Langness, apart from five, should be dedicated as public rights of way.

The five paths that may remain private include three leading from the lighthouse to the shore south and south east of the lighthouse, a fourth running across the peninsula and a fifth crossing the golf course.

Jeremy Clarkson's home in Langness
Anyone can object to the decision within 28 days

Mr Clarkson's wife, Frances Cain, said the family had received unwanted attention from passers-by and put a fence up to protect their privacy.

"This is the place that I brought my family, my husband and my children, with such a happy heart, and we've had such horrible experiences," she said.

However, the report's outcome was welcomed by Rushen MHKs Juan Watterson, Quintin Gill and Phil Gawne.

All three MHKs said in a joint statement that they felt it was a "victory for common sense".

They said: "Whilst not condoning the actions of some of the more militant campaigners who used dogs to deliberately distress wildlife or impose on the privacy of the landowners, the MHKs did feel that this was a victory for common sense and people power."

Mr Gill said he was "delighted" at the outcome.

"This has been an issue I have campaigned on for almost five years," he said.

"I am delighted that Mr Hickey has determined that rights of way have been established over the Langness peninsula."


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe ... 675771.stm

I like to imagine the other two are having a good chuckle at that :lol:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Tue May 11, 2010 11:47 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:23 pm
Posts: 638
Location: 3959 miles from the centre of the Earth - give or take a bit
Reply with quote
I'm surprised thay JC didn't think of this before they bought the property. The first thing you usually do is consulty the land registry to see if there are any.

_________________
i7 860 @ 3.5GHz, GTX275, 4GB DDR3


Wed May 12, 2010 7:20 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Now all they need to do is a put a bus lane adjacent to the footpath.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Wed May 12, 2010 7:34 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
Now all they need to do is a put a bus lane adjacent to the footpath.

Given it's heading towards a cliff, that would probably be unwise.


Wed May 12, 2010 12:21 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Well all he needs now is a caravan park next to his home. :twisted:

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed May 12, 2010 2:44 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:20 pm
Posts: 3838
Location: Here Abouts
Reply with quote
I found this quite telling, particularly the bits in bold:

Quote:
The dispute broke out in 2005 when Clarkson closed a 250 yard stretch of the path on his land and diverted it around his multi-million pound lighthouse home on the windswept Langness peninsula on the Isle of Man.

Although not legally a public footpath, campaigners claim that historically the landowner had granted 'permissive rights' to walkers.
But the move caused outage among residents and walkers who say the ancient path had been used for generations and should be designated as an established right of way.

Now after a four-year wrangle the dispute has finally come to a head at a public inqury which will rule on who is in the right.
But Clarkson, 49, has warned he will sell up if the hearing decides that the footpath should be open to everyone.
Clarkson has said: 'The whole point of buying a house on the end of a peninsula is so that you get five minutes not being bothered. When you are in the public eye it's very easy to be portrayed as a villain. Actually, in this case, I'm not.'
The broadcaster's wife Frances Clarkson told the inquiry that walkers on the peninsula are abusive to members of her family at least twice a week.

I do sympathise with him, at least he diverted it around his land rather than blocking their way completely, and if there are people being abusive then the ramblers association should be dealing with them. It seems that if a route has been used for "years" then people automagically have the right to use it forever. Interesting!!

_________________
The Official "Saucy Minx" ;)

This above all: To Thine Own Self Be True

"Red sky at night, Shepherds Delight"..Which is a bit like Shepherds Pie, but with whipped topping instead of mashed potato.


Wed May 12, 2010 3:00 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
Zippy wrote:
It seems that if a route has been used for "years" then people automagically have the right to use it forever. Interesting!!

I think that's pretty much how all rights of way over private land are established?

I forget the details, but I'm sure there's some law about 7 years that concerns any property if it's not fenced off and is in regular use? That could for example include someone's back garden if a neighbour was using it to wheel his bins down once a week.

:edit: perhaps that's 20 years:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easements_ ... _easements

"In order for a right to be prescribed it must meet the criterion of an easement, and the claimant must be able to show the use was not by force, stealth, or by permission, and continued for a period of twenty years."

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Thu May 13, 2010 2:00 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 7 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.