Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Nuke fans, climate agnostics gain ground 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Quote:
Climate agnostics now outnumber true believers who believe radical action is required for the first time, according to a YouGov poll.

The number of people who acknowledge scientific opinions differ has risen from 25 to 33 per cent, while the number who believe global warming is "a serious and urgent problem and radical steps must be taken NOW to prevent terrible damage being done to the planet" has fallen 10 per cent to 28 per cent over a year. The number of respondents who declare that they're "very interested" in global warming has fallen from 31 per cent in 2007 to 18 per cent.

The poll of over 4,000 Britons was commissioned by nuclear operator EDF, and it isn't hard to guess what they were fishing for. Happily for the state-owned French energy giant, they seem to have found it.

A majority support the easing of planning restrictions for building new nuclear power stations. More than half support the building of new nuclear power stations, while only six per cent agree with the statement that "the most important thing is to stop any building of nuclear power stations", and eight per cent oppose new nuclear capacity being built.

While the Conservatives promised to accelerate the building of new nuclear plants, they're reliant for a Parliamentary majority on a party which sees opposition to nuclear power as an identity issue. Still, only a third of LibDems oppose new nuclear replacing the stations being phased out. The voters may be more pragmatic than the MPs they elect.

Wind energy is still a darling, though - 72 per cent are in favour of wind farms.

EDF acquired the UK nuclear operator British Energy for €11bn last year.


http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/24 ... lear_poll/

So what do you make of that? It's by no means definitive, but it's what you'd maybe expect... The issue of the nuke plants interests me more tbh, curious to see how the Lib Dems react.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Mon May 24, 2010 12:58 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
I think this is one of those issues where public opinion counts for niente, this is one of those issues where an evidence-based/science-led policy needs to be in place.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Mon May 24, 2010 1:07 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
I can see the need for nuclear power but with the decommissioning costs falling on the government they need to add a tax to it that will be used to provide a sinking fund to cover the eventual costs. That tax should be the same as a high carbon tax that would make renewables the cheapest option by 5% and then coal and nuclear. With nuclear paying a decommissioning tax and fossil fuels paying a carbon tax. It would also eliminate the cost advantages of nuclear so that renewables can flourish.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon May 24, 2010 1:22 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 3 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.