Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Mozilla to bring Firefox to iPhone? 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
But since Flash and Java are huge security holes would you really want them on your phone? I don't.

That's not the point. The point is, not a single aspect of Firefox will actually be carried over except a vague cosmetic resemblance. It simply won't be Firefox.

And yes, as it happens I do want Flash and Java. Until HTML5 actually works there's simply too many things that can't be done without them.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Tue Jun 01, 2010 12:28 am
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
forquare1 wrote:
I don't really see the point of it if it's Using WebKit...After talking to the Camino developers on IRC, Gecko provides a lot more than just rendering, switching to WebKit would mean a lot more work to be done to the actual browser...Therefore, Firefox for iPhone simply won't be Firefox at all, rather Safari dressed up to look like it...


My understanding is that all it does in addition to the rendering is the UI layout?

Even if Apple's rules allowed them to use Gecko, surely they wouldn't use Gecko for the UI over Apple's kit?

_________________
Image


Tue Jun 01, 2010 12:38 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
finlay666 wrote:
The fennec on WM beta was terrible.

Browser was stupidly slow and laggy when it wasnt being totally unresponsive

The first betas wouldn't even start up, they were using too much memory. But, instead of trying to optimise the code, they complained that Microsoft wouldn't increase the arbitrary memory limit for applications in Windows Mobile (which would mean recalling all WM devices and installing more physical memory :roll: ).

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Tue Jun 01, 2010 4:12 am
Profile ICQ
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 4876
Location: Newcastle
Reply with quote
big_D wrote:
The first betas wouldn't even start up, they were using too much memory. But, instead of trying to optimise the code, they complained that Microsoft wouldn't increase the arbitrary memory limit for applications in Windows Mobile (which would mean recalling all WM devices and installing more physical memory :roll: ).


I got the first alpha running on my X1 (same internals as the Touch HD)

I had to use a barebones 6.1 rom with nothing else running though which is unacceptable.

Opera on the other hand seems to work fine on the beta (with exception of the first connection always failing for some reason)

_________________
Twitter
Charlie Brooker:
Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.


Tue Jun 01, 2010 4:20 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.