Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Housing Association build £1m apartment without consent 
Author Message
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ire ... 230743.stm

Quote:
A social housing scheme funded mostly by the taxpayer was built without planning permission, and remains empty almost a year after their completion.

The apartment block was built on edge of the Gas Works site near the Markets at a cost of almost £1m.

Helm Housing Association which owns the block, said it was told construction could begin in 2007, but planning approval has not yet been granted.

Anna Lo, MLA for the area, said Helm Housing had acted irresponsibly.

"Helm Housing has been a well-established housing association, for them to ignore the procedures and to build without planning permission is totally scandalous.

"They may now face the consequence of having to knock it down, wasting taxpayers' money."

A bunch of morons!

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:57 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
You'd have thought someone might have noticed. I can't imagine it went up over night?

It says: "Helm Housing Association which owns the block, said it was told construction could begin in 2007" which raises the question, who told them? Seriously, I want to know!

Are the planning department that bitter and twisted that they take pleasure from watching a million pounds of tax payer's money being spent and then ordering it destroyed, rather than handing the constructors a cease order before they'd built it? Maybe it was them that gave "permission" as some kind of sick joke?

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Fri Jun 04, 2010 1:05 am
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
They probably assumed that it would get the nod through and in many situations retrospective planning permission is given at a later date. Though not in this case.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Fri Jun 04, 2010 4:25 am
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Often in NI, certain pressures are brought to bear - remember the DUP deals with Gordon? Picture that sort of thing with Sinn Fein, though I've never seen it play out at such a local level, and such a level of cock-up... I'm guessing they'll compromise and the apartments will stand ;)

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Fri Jun 04, 2010 12:34 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
Often in NI, certain pressures are brought to bear - remember the DUP deals with Gordon? Picture that sort of thing with Sinn Fein, though I've never seen it play out at such a local level, and such a level of cock-up... I'm guessing they'll compromise and the apartments will stand ;)

Yes but if they will not qualify for planning permission they will be setting a bad precedent in that anyone will then build and ignore planning permission and cite this case as precedent. In that case the buildings either should come down or the Housing association fined substantially, with the money going into council coffers for social housing.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Fri Jun 04, 2010 2:30 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
pcernie wrote:
Often in NI, certain pressures are brought to bear - remember the DUP deals with Gordon? Picture that sort of thing with Sinn Fein, though I've never seen it play out at such a local level, and such a level of cock-up... I'm guessing they'll compromise and the apartments will stand ;)

Yes but if they will not qualify for planning permission they will be setting a bad precedent in that anyone will then build and ignore planning permission and cite this case as precedent. In that case the buildings either should come down or the Housing association fined substantially, with the money going into council coffers for social housing.


The 'bad precedent' was set long ago and is now a fine tradition ;)

Doing anything other than letting them stand will require even more questions to be answered, and you know how that goes...

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Jun 05, 2010 9:28 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
I still think a huge fine would stop the problem. A fine so big that they will never make a profit on the deal and use it as a basis to go after private contractors as well.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sat Jun 05, 2010 9:44 am
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
I still think a huge fine would stop the problem. A fine so big that they will never make a profit on the deal and use it as a basis to go after private contractors as well.


Not gonna happen in this part of the empire - too many vested interests for too many people ;)

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Jun 05, 2010 10:33 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
I still think a huge fine would stop the problem. A fine so big that they will never make a profit on the deal and use it as a basis to go after private contractors as well.


Not gonna happen in this part of the empire - too many vested interests for too many people ;)

Yes but what else will stop developers flouting the rules. If you or I did it they would get us to demolish the building.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:41 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
pcernie wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
I still think a huge fine would stop the problem. A fine so big that they will never make a profit on the deal and use it as a basis to go after private contractors as well.


Not gonna happen in this part of the empire - too many vested interests for too many people ;)

Yes but what else will stop developers flouting the rules. If you or I did it they would get us to demolish the building.


I'd say it doesn't make much difference now, as common sense (or whatever you like to refer to it as) should prevail over the law/regulations at this point and in this case, but this type of issue should certainly not arise in the future if any lessons are learned here...

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:59 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
From a green perspective they should not demolish the building but that just lets them off the hook. Hence the fine. In future to stop it they need building inspectors out to stop them before they have completed the building. They should be out there wandering the streets looking for developments and checking that they comply, and halting them if necessary.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sat Jun 05, 2010 4:48 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
They can always apply for retrospective permission, but failing that tear the damn thing down, or else it will only encourage further non-compliance with the rules.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Sun Jun 06, 2010 12:26 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 12 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.