Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Report: iPad with FaceTime due early 2011 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
An Apple iPad featuring FaceTime videocalling is due to be released in early 2011, according to reports from Apple's suppliers in Asia.

Display component vendors undergoing validation with Apple right now have revealed that the updated iPad will arrive at some point in the second quarter of 2011, suggesting that we could be seeing iPad 2 arriving at some point in the spring next year.

FaceTime iPad calls

DigiTimes claims that Apple suppliers expect that the updated iPad will arrive by the second quarter of 2011, featuring full FaceTime video-calling compatibility.

DigiTimes goes on to cite TPK Touch Solutions, Wintek, Cando, and Chimei Innolux as suppliers for Apple's next gen ultra-thin touch panels, set to feature reinforced glass.

All display components in testing are for a 9.7-inch screen size, so it seems like we might forget those rumours of a small-screen Apple iPad. At least for now.

FaceTime is already available on the iPhone 4 and the recently-released 4th-gen iPod touch


Read more: http://www.techradar.com/news/computing ... z1062n41UL

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Mon Sep 20, 2010 6:39 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
This will make the iPad an even more attractive option. With the iPod Touch having FaceTime as well, it could be a better option for kids instead of a mobile. Certainly no call charges yet they can chat to friends as much as they like.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:56 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:23 pm
Posts: 710
Reply with quote
Presumably this will require a camera to be included. Why wasn't it in the first model we ask.


Oh, to get more sales of course. Silly of me.

_________________
No Apples were used in the making of this post.


Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:30 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
mikepgood wrote:
Presumably this will require a camera to be included. Why wasn't it in the first model we ask.


Oh, to get more sales of course. Silly of me.

Now now! theres no need to be that cynical. Im sure there was a perfectly rational explanation... somewhere :lol:

_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:31 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
bobbdobbs wrote:
mikepgood wrote:
Presumably this will require a camera to be included. Why wasn't it in the first model we ask.


Oh, to get more sales of course. Silly of me.

Now now! theres no need to be that cynical. Im sure there was a perfectly rational explanation... somewhere :lol:


They are trying ton work out where the top is to put the camera. It’s actually a tricky thing to determine, as the iPad can be held any way up, and because of its size, there is more of a problem with having the camera to the left or right of the screen when it’s being held in in a landscape orientation. Unless they can bury the camera behind the screen. Now that would be a feat (and it is something Apple have a patent for, BTW).

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:44 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:23 pm
Posts: 710
Reply with quote
My vote would be opposite the button. Portrait mode is so-named for a reason.

_________________
No Apples were used in the making of this post.


Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:50 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Landscape might be a better viewing layout. If they are adding FActTime to iChat then with many widescreen macs it could be blown out to full screen easily enough.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:39 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:53 pm
Posts: 8603
Location: location, location
Reply with quote
Or install 2 camera's & activate them with the tilt sensor

_________________
Support X404, use our Amazon link
Get your X404 tat here
jonlumb wrote:
I've only ever done it with a chicken so far, but if required I wouldn't have any problems doing it with other animals at all.


Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:42 am
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
saspro wrote:
Or install 2 camera's & activate them with the tilt sensor

That might be a better option. Though will there be another camera in the back?

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:52 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
Opposite the button, like the iphone 4. Why does it matter whether the device is held portrait or landscape? As long as the camera is angled to focus on a point toward the middle of the display at half arms length, then it won't matter, the user can hold it how they want.

Or maybe a patent for a camera that can re-angle its objecrive?

That said, I'd more likely use GoToMeeting than FaceTime...

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:00 pm
Profile ICQ
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
If they are adding FActTime



What does this do? Make it impossible to lie online? ;)

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:25 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
If they are adding FActTime



What does this do? Make it impossible to lie online? ;)

Typo. It should have been FaceTime :oops:

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Sep 22, 2010 4:18 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 12 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.