Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Councils to get powers to cross-match data 
Author Message
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
Hmm - I suspect that this could be Used For Evil™

Quote:
Councils are to get powers to cross-match their databases as part of a pilot scheme intended to increase the number of people registered to vote.


and

Quote:
Data protection campaigners have raised concerns about data-matching without the permission of the people whose information it is.

NO2ID national coordinator Phil Booth said: "On the one hand the government have said they want to roll back the database state, but now they seem to be saying we are going to use this data just because we have it.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11764157

It actually surfaced yesterday - but was generally unnoticed by the media. Can’t think why.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:06 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Any bets that once this is done that it will not be used for other purposes? At first it will be used to get people on the electoral roll, then they will use it to find people claiming single person discount on council tax that they are not entitled to. Then allow the tories to have another bash at a poll tax? Then stop abuses of the school admissions system.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:13 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 1:03 pm
Posts: 5041
Location: London
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
Any bets that once this is done that it will not be used for other purposes? At first it will be used to get people on the electoral roll, then they will use it to find people claiming single person discount on council tax that they are not entitled to. Then allow the tories to have another bash at a poll tax? Then stop abuses of the school admissions system.


and?


All this data is in the hands of the councils or on other publically available databases

If by doing this they do stop people ripping off the state (so forcing me to pay extra) then good on them

I was (and still am) against the ID scheme as that forced me to register a lot of data in one place for no good reason at a very high cost – if a good reason had been found I would have re-examined my opposition

_________________
John_Vella wrote:
OK, so all we need to do is find a half African, half Chinese, half Asian, gay, one eyed, wheelchair bound dwarf with tourettes and a lisp, and a st st stutter and we could make the best panel show ever.


Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:31 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Yes but the single person discount is abused by many, but the whole council tax scheme is flawed. I am still not convinced that combining the databases will not lead to a decentralised ID database.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Nov 17, 2010 6:52 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am
Posts: 7011
Location: Wiltshire
Reply with quote
This is not good.

_________________
<input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />


Wed Nov 17, 2010 6:54 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
hifidelity2 wrote:
and?


All this data is in the hands of the councils or on other publicly available databases

If by doing this they do stop people ripping off the state (so forcing me to pay extra) then good on them

Exactly. There's no indication that data is to be shared outside of the government. It's simply being used more efficiently. You might even call it "joined up thinking"; something I wish they'd do more often.

It's absolutely chuffing ridiculous the hoops departments in different councils have to go through at the moment. If someone moves about, surely it makes more sense for their records to be available everywhere rather than have a bunch of civil servants needlessly duplicating work that's already been done.

I'll give you an example. I reported a crime. It happened in London, but I reported it at a station local to my home. After 3 months I went to another station near my office to ask why there was no news. Apparently it takes over 3 months to transfer crime reports from one area to another which is done via printed documents and legal teams at huge expense. This particular station had absolutely no way of accessing the information which may well have been important to them! This was just 18 months ago; not back in the dark ages.

FFS, surely it should just be on a database? Fragmentation is simply inefficient and it's costing YOU money in the consequent bureaucracy. In some cases, it might cost you your life.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Wed Nov 17, 2010 9:18 pm
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
JJW009 wrote:
hifidelity2 wrote:
and?


All this data is in the hands of the councils or on other publicly available databases

If by doing this they do stop people ripping off the state (so forcing me to pay extra) then good on them

Exactly. There's no indication that data is to be shared outside of the government. It's simply being used more efficiently. You might even call it "joined up thinking"; something I wish they'd do more often.

It's absolutely chuffing ridiculous the hoops departments in different councils have to go through at the moment. If someone moves about, surely it makes more sense for their records to be available everywhere rather than have a bunch of civil servants needlessly duplicating work that's already been done.

I'll give you an example. I reported a crime. It happened in London, but I reported it at a station local to my home. After 3 months I went to another station near my office to ask why there was no news. Apparently it takes over 3 months to transfer crime reports from one area to another which is done via printed documents and legal teams at huge expense. This particular station had absolutely no way of accessing the information which may well have been important to them! This was just 18 months ago; not back in the dark ages.

FFS, surely it should just be on a database? Fragmentation is simply inefficient and it's costing YOU money in the consequent bureaucracy. In some cases, it might cost you your life.

Yes but councils are not linked to police forces. Also you did not state which areas were involved. The police operate on a county basis and many people work in different counties and they are not connected. If you report a burglary in Surrey the Hampshire or Kent constabularies are unlikely to know about it.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Nov 17, 2010 9:46 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 7 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.