Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Dixons wishes for a 3D Christmas 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://www.techradar.com/news/televisio ... mas-910968

I'm predicting FAIL :oops:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Fri Nov 26, 2010 1:50 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 5048
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
http://www.techradar.com/news/television/dixons-wishes-for-a-3d-christmas-910968

I'm predicting FAIL :oops:

FAIL with knobs on.

_________________
Fogmeister I ventured into Solitude but didn't really do much.
jonbwfc I was behind her in a queue today - but I wouldn't describe it as 'bushy'.


Fri Nov 26, 2010 3:33 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:07 pm
Posts: 573
Location: Sunny Hastings
Reply with quote
adidan wrote:
pcernie wrote:
http://www.techradar.com/news/television/dixons-wishes-for-a-3d-christmas-910968

I'm predicting FAIL :oops:

FAIL with knobs on.


+ 1

_________________
Image

Gaming's Elder Statesman & Evil Consultant


Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:08 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
FAIL with 6 ensuite bedrooms, a Neo-Georgian frontage, ample parking, easy access to the M4 and excellent views of the Wye Valley.

_________________
Jim

Image


Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:24 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
My dad was thinking about a new TV and BD player. There's a deal for a Panasonic plasma, BD player, free 3D BD movies and free 3D glasses. On that basis the package for him was probably worth it given it's around his budget for TV and player anyway.

It's not for me though. I'm not buying into the tech. I went to a friends who put Alice in Wonderland on (Sony Bravia) and it didnt look right. The image still looked flat but stacked on planes behind each other if that makes sense.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:44 pm
Profile WWW
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
rustybucket wrote:
FAIL with 6 ensuite bedrooms, a Neo-Georgian frontage, ample parking, easy access to the M4 and excellent views of the Wye Valley.


:lol: :D

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Nov 27, 2010 3:19 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
veato wrote:
The image still looked flat but stacked on planes behind each other if that makes sense.


Hardly surprising - Alice was a 3D conversion from 2D which was rushed through. It was heavily criticised for its poor 3D, just like Clash of the TItans was. Stereoscopic images (this is what this current wave of 3D is) can make things look like stacked flat planes - it’s the nature of the beast. If done well, things can look good, but you have to be planning to make a 3D film from the start, and be using decent 3D cameras.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:08 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
veato wrote:
The image still looked flat but stacked on planes behind each other if that makes sense.


Hardly surprising - Alice was a 3D conversion from 2D which was rushed through. It was heavily criticised for its poor 3D, just like Clash of the TItans was. Stereoscopic images (this is what this current wave of 3D is) can make things look like stacked flat planes - it’s the nature of the beast. If done well, things can look good, but you have to be planning to make a 3D film from the start, and be using decent 3D cameras.


I wondered if that was the case. From what I've seen at the cinema Avatar and Toy Story (to a lesser extend but added a nice depth to the picture) have had the best 3D effects. I'd like to see those on a home setup to compare.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Mon Nov 29, 2010 3:00 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 6580
Location: Getting there
Reply with quote
veato wrote:
paulzolo wrote:
Hardly surprising - Alice was a 3D conversion from 2D which was rushed through. It was heavily criticised for its poor 3D, just like Clash of the TItans was. Stereoscopic images (this is what this current wave of 3D is) can make things look like stacked flat planes - it’s the nature of the beast. If done well, things can look good, but you have to be planning to make a 3D film from the start, and be using decent 3D cameras.


I wondered if that was the case. From what I've seen at the cinema Avatar and Toy Story (to a lesser extend but added a nice depth to the picture) have had the best 3D effects. I'd like to see those on a home setup to compare.

Up was very good in 3D also. There were no particularly 3D-esque effects (i.e. things shooting out of the screen etc...) but it just added nicely to the feel of the movie.

Also, by its very nature, CGI films can be "converted" to 3D very easily as they are just big 3D models where the same scene can be run over and over with cameras in different places or indeed 2 stereoscopic cameras to create a 3D stereogram image.

_________________
Oliver Foggin - iPhone Dev

JJW009 wrote:
The count will go up until they stop counting. That's the way counting works.


Doodle Sub!
Game Of Life

Image Image


Mon Nov 29, 2010 3:15 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 6580
Location: Getting there
Reply with quote
Actually, it wouldn't surprise me if they went and did a few older films (Toy Story 1 and 2, Monsters Inc, Shrek, The Incredibles, etc...) as 3DD versions and released them again.

They will still have the raw data archived somewhere so it shouldn't be too much effort to do (relatively).

_________________
Oliver Foggin - iPhone Dev

JJW009 wrote:
The count will go up until they stop counting. That's the way counting works.


Doodle Sub!
Game Of Life

Image Image


Mon Nov 29, 2010 3:16 pm
Profile WWW
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
I was just thinking the last Trek film might have decent scenes for 3D-ification...

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Mon Nov 29, 2010 3:30 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
Fogmeister wrote:
Actually, it wouldn't surprise me if they went and did a few older films (Toy Story 1 and 2, Monsters Inc, Shrek, The Incredibles, etc...) as 3DD versions and released them again.

They will still have the raw data archived somewhere so it shouldn't be too much effort to do (relatively).


They had to rebuild the Toy Story models from scratch for Toy Story 3 because the software had moved on so much that they could not open the old models. So unless they have legacy rendering farms kicking around, opening the files for the original movie could be a challenge.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Mon Nov 29, 2010 3:48 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
People just don't have that kind of money spare at the moment. I was in a shop yesterday looking for a 37" (ish) LED back lit TV with HD Freeview. I took one look at the prices and decided it could wait a few more years. I wasn't even looking at 3D ones. (Not that I'm even interested in 3D ones.)

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Tue Nov 30, 2010 7:52 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
People just don't have that kind of money spare at the moment. I was in a shop yesterday looking for a 37" (ish) LED back lit TV with HD Freeview. I took one look at the prices and decided it could wait a few more years. I wasn't even looking at 3D ones. (Not that I'm even interested in 3D ones.)


I've seen a 42" Sharp LED for £450. I think they use the "full array" LED backlighting method though which is scraping the bottom of the barrel.

Wiki wrote:
LED backlighting techniques

RGB dynamic LEDs
This method of backlighting allows dimming to occur in locally specific areas of darkness on the screen. This can show truer blacks, whites and PRs at much higher dynamic contrast ratios, at the cost of less detail in small bright objects on a dark background, such as star fields.

Edge-LEDs
This method of backlighting allows for LED-backlit TVs to become extremely thin. The light is diffused across the screen by a special panel which produces a uniform color range across the screen.

Full Array LEDs
Sharp, and now other brands, also have LED backlighting technology that aligns the LEDs on back of the TV like the RGB Dynamic LED backlight, but it lacks the local dimming of other sets. The main benefit of its LED backlight is simply reduced energy consumption and may not improve quality over non-LED LCD TVs.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:39 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 14 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.