"And damnit, that OUR job", he didn't add.
I'm not sure the reforms he's talked about implementing will make a jot of difference. Giving shareholders veto over executive remuneration is in theory a good idea but the fact is most companies' shares are held by institutional investors. The people who will control those votes are therefore... executives. Can anyone else see the obvious flaw in this plan?
There was a government report into executive pay a while ago that proposed some much more useful measures (remuneration not above a (still quite large) multiple of average pay etc). I just can't remember the name of it off the top of my head. Cameron & Co are adopting very few of the recommendations of that report. It could be... interesting come next PMQs. Which, IIRC, is sadly not for quite some time.
Jon