Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Energy from the Sea 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 1:03 pm
Posts: 5041
Location: London
Reply with quote
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-16676818

I have to say this does seem a really simple and great idea - it allows you to store energy which has always been an issue and there must be lost of sites where it could be used

_________________
John_Vella wrote:
OK, so all we need to do is find a half African, half Chinese, half Asian, gay, one eyed, wheelchair bound dwarf with tourettes and a lisp, and a st st stutter and we could make the best panel show ever.


Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:40 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:23 pm
Posts: 710
Reply with quote
Seems to make sense.
Only problem I see is the seawater reservoirs on the cliff top, salt damage to surrounding plants if there are leaks. And people falling in if not covered. And the variability of flow depending on the waves, too full when rough, not full enough when calm.

I seem to remember that some hydroelectric plants used to pump water back up overnight when demand was low rather than shut down or slow the (relatively more) efficient conventional stations. Also hydro could be flipped on quickly to meet the commercial break spikes when all the kettles went on

_________________
No Apples were used in the making of this post.


Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:32 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 1:03 pm
Posts: 5041
Location: London
Reply with quote
mikepgood wrote:
Seems to make sense.
I seem to remember that some hydroelectric plants used to pump water back up overnight when demand was low rather than shut down or slow the (relatively more) efficient conventional stations. Also hydro could be flipped on quickly to meet the commercial break spikes when all the kettles went on

Exactly - I see this as an expansion of the Stored Hydro schemes - the advantage (to the UK) is that they can be built anywhere where this is a reasonable drop from sea to "storage tank" and we have a good coastline.

_________________
John_Vella wrote:
OK, so all we need to do is find a half African, half Chinese, half Asian, gay, one eyed, wheelchair bound dwarf with tourettes and a lisp, and a st st stutter and we could make the best panel show ever.


Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:48 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
It doesn't have the capability to be a very large provider though. In the article they say:

Quote:
200 sites could generate enough energy to power about 230,000 homes.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:07 pm
Profile WWW
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am
Posts: 1911
Reply with quote
Surely it just combines the standard problem of all wave power (sea water is corrosive and all this kit will need masses of maintenance) with the waste that is inherent in all stored hydro to create what is almost certainly going to be hugely expensive trickle of power.


Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:29 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
A much better idea than wind power is you ask me. It's not as if you're going to get several days in a row without tides.
Wind power is a unreliable waste of tax/bill payers money.

Personally I'd go for carbon capture on coal power stations and pump the waste gas down old oil/gas wells.
Coal is readily available in the UK so we wouldn't need to worry about other countries cutting off the supply. Yes, it's prices, but no more so that stupid wind turbines and the extra power stations required to back them up on calm days.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:41 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
ShockWaffle wrote:
Surely it just combines the standard problem of all wave power (sea water is corrosive and all this kit will need masses of maintenance) with the waste that is inherent in all stored hydro to create what is almost certainly going to be hugely expensive trickle of power.

But damn you future of the planet and some enormous government subsidies are at stake!

l3v1ck wrote:
A much better idea than wind power is you ask me. It's not as if you're going to get several days in a row without tides.
Wind power is a unreliable waste of tax/bill payers money.

Well wave power is still variable - some days you get bigger waves than others. The solutions I've seen that use surface wave generation have to be massively over-engineered to cope with the fact that wave height can be anything from a few inches to 10's of feet. I've seen some solutions that use under-surface currents rather than waves which seemed a bit more feasible, but the total cost per watt still isn't any better than a nuke plant, even accounting for clean up costs of the latter.


Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:46 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
Well wave power is still variable - some days you get bigger waves than others.
I'm talking about tidal power, not wave power.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:55 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
jonbwfc wrote:
Well wave power is still variable - some days you get bigger waves than others.
I'm talking about tidal power, not wave power.

The article is talking about wave power, not tidal power. Specifically, it states "swell" waves hence the required dpths etc : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swell_%28ocean%29

As to cost, maybe he's full of sails bull but he states:

Quote:
Mr Vince said: "We believe Searaser has the potential to produce electricity at a lower cost than any other type of energy, not just other forms of renewable energy but all 'conventional' forms of energy too."

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:54 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 9 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.