Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Royal pardon for codebreaker Alan Turing 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-25495315

:D

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Tue Dec 24, 2013 3:20 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am
Posts: 6954
Location: Peebo
Reply with quote
Good news indeed and about time too.

One has to wonder what else Turing could have achieved if he hadn't been convicted and 'treated'.

_________________
When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum.
-Billy Connolly (to a heckler)


Tue Dec 24, 2013 3:24 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
Bad idea. Its revisionist policy. At the time it was the law no matter how repugnant it is to modern sensibilities.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4

_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Tue Dec 24, 2013 3:31 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am
Posts: 1911
Reply with quote
One the one hand it's about as pointless as posthumously freeing all those slaves we took. There must be a fair number of surviving victims of that legal regime, so I guess what matters is how this makes them feel. Does this empty token bring them a sense of vindication?


Tue Dec 24, 2013 5:04 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:44 pm
Posts: 4141
Location: Exeter
Reply with quote
I think pardoning is the wrong idea here. Just because something was the law in the past does not make it right. As a society we now recognise how fundamentally wrong that legislation was (and in particular how barbaric the punishments were). I think what is actually required is for those "crimes" to be struck from the record, and where possible restitution made to those that are still alive. Also it needs to apply to everyone convicted for that offence (I believe about 75,000 people), not just Turing.

_________________
"The woman is a riddle inside a mystery wrapped in an enigma I've had sex with."


Tue Dec 24, 2013 5:10 pm
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
jonlumb wrote:
I think pardoning is the wrong idea here. Just because something was the law in the past does not make it right. As a society we now recognise how fundamentally wrong that legislation was (and in particular how barbaric the punishments were). I think what is actually required is for those "crimes" to be struck from the record, and where possible restitution made to those that are still alive. Also it needs to apply to everyone convicted for that offence (I believe about 75,000 people), not just Turing.

Yes there are many who were arrested for such crimes. The pardon should be extended to everyone.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Dec 24, 2013 6:05 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
jonlumb wrote:
I think pardoning is the wrong idea here. Just because something was the law in the past does not make it right. As a society we now recognise how fundamentally wrong that legislation was (and in particular how barbaric the punishments were). I think what is actually required is for those "crimes" to be struck from the record, and where possible restitution made to those that are still alive. Also it needs to apply to everyone convicted for that offence (I believe about 75,000 people), not just Turing.

I agree with all of this in principle, but in reality you have to draw a line. There are many things that were illegal in the past that we now consider perfectly fine and there were punishments in the past that we would now consider draconian. I mean, where do you stop, are we going to apologise to the population of Australia for what we did to some of their forebears?

The fact is this is actually a recognition that Turing's work during WWII makes him exceptional, so they're making a special effort and, indeed, an exception for him by making this formal declaration. The bare fact is nobody (or at least very very few people) now consider anyone who was convicted of something similar to Turing as being a criminal. We all know it happened, we all know it's wrong and we know we've learned to behave better. If there are people who were persecuted are still alive, some public declaration of their mistreatment would be reasonable. But at the end of the day, the dead don't care.

There are many things we as a nation did in the past which we as a nation today would not do. But history is a very long time and the past is done and can't be changed. Does pardoning people long in the grave really mean anything?


Tue Dec 24, 2013 6:40 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 7 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.