Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Paedophiles who download images 'won't all be charged' 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-29692685

By all means do it on 'merit', but 50k scumbags? How many tens of thousands won't be prosecuted then? :?

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Mon Oct 20, 2014 7:37 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
50,000? There's that many people they know of but aren't doing anything about?

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Mon Oct 20, 2014 8:38 pm
Profile WWW
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
50,000? There's that many people they know of but aren't doing anything about?


That's the NCA's own estimate and, consequently, admission that many will slip the net. So you could expect a few thousand bare minimum even though they seem to know exactly who they are. Surely you'd use neighbouring forces in one big push whether it's their patch or not? We get English officers etc over here all the time for everything from consultancy to riots.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Mon Oct 20, 2014 8:53 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
It's not the 50,000 people that are the issue. It's the (some multiple times) 50,000 PCs that have to be forensically analysed to court evidence standards. That's a specialist task, there aren't all that many people who can do it and it takes time. A related story in the news said there was effectively a year's waiting list to get a PC analysed now, let alone flooding the system with say 100,000 extra jobs. It's not that they don't want to prosecute them, it's just they simply don't have the resources to do so and stand a chance of the evidence being admissible in a viable timescale.

Still, austerity, eh? All in this together,what?


Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:42 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 4 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.