Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Tories ‘trying to buy election’ - campaign spending up 23% 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... n-spending

Might the Lib Dems not have thought to mention it? We really need a sarcasm smilie...

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun Dec 14, 2014 8:03 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
The competition can spend more too. That cancels out the effect, but costs more.

It's like the opposite of when fag adverts were banned. All companies spend less on advertising, but none lost market share as they all had the same rules. Profits went up massively in the short term.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Sun Dec 14, 2014 8:11 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
The competition can spend more too. That cancels out the effect, but costs more.

Depends if they have it. The Tories have generally had more funds than the competition.


Sun Dec 14, 2014 9:46 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
l3v1ck wrote:
The competition can spend more too. That cancels out the effect, but costs more.

Depends if they have it. The Tories have generally had more funds than the competition.

I thought all the political parties were in debt. I though most of their money comes from party members and Rich donors (Tories) or the unions (Labour).

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Sun Dec 14, 2014 11:51 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
Didn't there used to be rules on how much political parties could spend on elections? Or was that individual MPs?

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Mon Dec 15, 2014 4:51 am
Profile ICQ
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
I'm not sure. There could be as they don't spend 'American' amounts on elections.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Mon Dec 15, 2014 5:13 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 6 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.