Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
The injunction is back: entertainer blocks story 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
The injunction is back: entertainer blocks extramarital affair story | Media | The Guardian
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/m ... fair-story

Here's the thing, if there's no public interest... why would it be devastating to the entertainer? And it seems a bit late to be thinking of the kids now, the internet being that very reason.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Wed Mar 23, 2016 2:38 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
To be honest, I tend to actually agree with the judge in this case. The public would certainly be interested, but that doesn't mean its' in the public's interest to know, or that the public interest outweighs people's right privacy in their private lives, even if they are celebrities, provided nobody is being hurt.

If the celebrity in this case was making some gain from publicly espousing marital fidelity then maybe. But he's OK with it, his wife's OK with it. His kids apparently don't know about it. So what's the grounds for making it public beyond voyeurism?

Plus I have to be honest, I don't have a very high opinion of the couple who are selling the story. That's pretty sleazy behaviour.


Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:50 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Scottish newspaper reveals identity of superinjunction couple | Media | The Guardian
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016 ... ion-couple

Bad enough American publications have given the game away, but the law's so pathetic and ill thought out it doesn't even stand in part of the UK.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun Apr 10, 2016 7:10 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:06 pm
Posts: 6355
Location: IoW
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
Scottish newspaper reveals identity of superinjunction couple | Media | The Guardian
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016 ... ion-couple

Bad enough American publications have given the game away, but the law's so pathetic and ill thought out it doesn't even stand in part of the UK.

It took a couple of minutes on google to find out - it was hardly a surprise.

_________________
Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes; after that, who cares?! He's a mile away and you've got his shoes!


Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:21 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
To be honest, I tend to actually agree with the judge in this case. The public would certainly be interested, but that doesn't mean its' in the public's interest to know, or that the public interest outweighs people's right privacy in their private lives, even if they are celebrities, provided nobody is being hurt.

If the celebrity in this case was making some gain from publicly espousing marital fidelity then maybe. But he's OK with it, his wife's OK with it. His kids apparently don't know about it. So what's the grounds for making it public beyond voyeurism?

Plus I have to be honest, I don't have a very high opinion of the couple who are selling the story. That's pretty sleazy behaviour.

I couldn't have put it better myself.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Mon Apr 11, 2016 3:54 am
Profile ICQ
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:29 pm
Posts: 5975
Reply with quote
It is a sad, sad situation.

_________________
"I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet." - Stanislaw Lem


Mon Apr 11, 2016 12:19 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am
Posts: 6954
Location: Peebo
Reply with quote
Paul1965 wrote:
It is a sad, sad situation.

Have we not done that joke already. :D

In other news, injunction doesn't apply in Scotland so one of the Scottish newspapers has published the details anyway, though not on their website. clickety

Quote:
Linking the decision to publish the identities to the Panama Papers revelations, the newspaper’s editorial said: “Maybe, as the very rich and very powerful clients of Mossack Fonseca run to their lawyers, it was bad luck that [the celebrities’] superinjunction emerged.

“Because, just to be clear, we are not naming them because of the story they are trying to suppress. We couldn’t care less. We do, however, care about free speech, a free press and very wealthy people spending huge sums of money stopping stories they do not much like the sound of.

“If we did not name them, it would only encourage people – possibly celebrities, more probably tycoons and politicians – with something to hide to attempt to hide it behind a court order.”

_________________
When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum.
-Billy Connolly (to a heckler)


Mon Apr 11, 2016 3:54 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am
Posts: 7935
Location: Manchester.
Reply with quote
Paul1965 wrote:
It is a sad, sad situation.

I imagine that if any English newsrags published the names they'd probably get a rocket, man.

_________________
okenobi wrote:
John's hot. No denying it. But he's hardly Karen now, is he ;)

John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker :P
Sorry :roll:
I'll behave now.
Promise ;)


Wed Apr 13, 2016 11:43 am
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:44 pm
Posts: 4860
Reply with quote
super injunction and now take down requests demanded of google. it does seem a self inflicted yellow brick road to self destruction or maybe they believe they are just pin ball wizards trying their luck ...

_________________
Hope this helps . . . Steve ...

Nothing known travels faster than light, except bad news ...
HP Pavilion 24" AiO. Ryzen7u. 32GB/1TB M2. Windows 11 Home ...


Thu Apr 14, 2016 9:07 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
Has no one heard of the Streisand Effect....? :roll:

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Thu Apr 14, 2016 11:09 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am
Posts: 6954
Location: Peebo
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
Has no one heard of the Streisand Effect....? :roll:

Apparently the people who should be paying most attention to it have not.

_________________
When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum.
-Billy Connolly (to a heckler)


Thu Apr 14, 2016 11:37 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 11 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.