That's disgusting.
First we had the Terrorism Act, the provisions of which would only be used "in extreme circumstances" - and we see it get used against photographers and protestors.
Then we had RIPA, which would only be used against people engaged in "serious" criminal behaviour, and we've seen it been used to see if parents are in a school catchment area, if people are putting their bins out too early or simple littering.
And now we have this authoritarian [LIFTED]. Where does this leave the Right to Privacy under the ECHR? Where does this leave the requirement for RIPA authorisation for surveillance?
I also note that the intend to retain the footage on a database. Presumably if someone has done nothing wrong/not charged or convicted then the footage will be erased? Yeah, right.
This goes against the spirit of the ruling of the ECHR, in which the government was criticised for not removing DNA from the national database when a person was not charged or convicted.
Okenobi...sign me up.