Author |
Message |
pcernie
Legend
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm Posts: 45931 Location: Belfast
|
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/350866/labo ... itter-tsar'Damn it we have to appear hip - quick, post something about iPods!' 
_________________Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:
http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/
|
Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:11 pm |
|
 |
AlunD
Site Admin
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am Posts: 7011 Location: Wiltshire
|
Beyond bloody belief and our tax that pays for it all 
_________________ <input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />
|
Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:42 pm |
|
 |
james016
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 5:52 pm Posts: 1899
|
 I think that 40% figure will skyrocket 
_________________ My Flickr PageNow with added ball and chain.
|
Tue Aug 18, 2009 1:06 pm |
|
 |
paulzolo
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm Posts: 12251
|

There is an interesting difference between the usual channels and Twitter (or even Facebook).
Getting your message across has always involved some form of advertising, and that advertising is usually crammed into a space - be it time during a TV programme, white space on a web site, email etc..
Twitter requires you, the content provider, to be followed by an audience. I follow a couple of companies on Twitter, because I am genuinely interested in their product, but also because their use of Twitter seems sensitive to the system. I get followed by a lot of bots or people with get rich schemes, and I tend to block them. A follow itself does not equate to a follow back. However, I suspect that these kinds of Twitter user are blanket following or working under the false impression that follows are always reciprocal.
To get a follow on Twitter, you have to be interesting enough to the audience. That means being engaging, helpful, entertaining or interesting in whatever it is you do. The companies I follow tweet helpful stuff about their products, and that is helpful.
Compare that with how you deal with adverts on web sites or spam emails. I know a lot here proactively employ software to block them. Twitter kind of does that for you be default. It’s like having a spam filter on maximum and you let in just messages you want from sources you are interested in. You can just as easily switch them off again.
It will be interesting to see how this Tsar handles Twitter, and how the Government uses it to engage. I can’t imagine that they will have much interesting to speak about, though I expect we’ll all be followed by the spooks.
|
Tue Aug 18, 2009 1:50 pm |
|
 |
Zippy
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:20 pm Posts: 3838 Location: Here Abouts
|
I'm fairly sure that should read "Twitter Twat" shouldn't it??!?!?
_________________The Official "Saucy Minx"  This above all: To Thine Own Self Be True "Red sky at night, Shepherds Delight"..Which is a bit like Shepherds Pie, but with whipped topping instead of mashed potato.
|
Tue Aug 18, 2009 2:26 pm |
|
 |
james016
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 5:52 pm Posts: 1899
|
So we'll be hearing about the Twat's twits in the press soon.
_________________ My Flickr PageNow with added ball and chain.
|
Tue Aug 18, 2009 2:52 pm |
|
 |
JJW009
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm Posts: 8767 Location: behind the sofa
|
It'll probably be a twit twat chunky.
_________________jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly." When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net
|
Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:40 pm |
|
 |
pcernie
Legend
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm Posts: 45931 Location: Belfast
|
That was my first thought 
_________________Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:
http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/
|
Tue Aug 18, 2009 7:56 pm |
|
|