Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
'Artificial trees' to cut carbon 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm
Posts: 5150
Location: /dev/tty0
Reply with quote
Quote:
Engineers say a forest of 100,000 "artificial trees" could be deployed within 10 to 20 years to help soak up the world's carbon emissions.


BBC Clicky

I quite like the idea of storing it in the old oil wells...
And the £10million figure...Is this the UK's contribution? and are other nations going to put in?


Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:23 am
Profile WWW
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
Once again we're after spending money to try to prevent something over which we have little control, instead of spending it to cope with the changes that are inevitable anyway.

I despair. I really do.

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Thu Aug 27, 2009 9:15 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 5048
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
Once again we're after spending money to try to prevent something over which we have little control, instead of spending it to cope with the changes that are inevitable anyway.

Indeed. The climate would change irrespective of whether humans were here or not and Carbon really isn't the biggest baddy out there whether you believe CO2 contributes to, or is a byproduct of, a warming climate.

As an aside though, we do need other forms of producing electricity. I happened to catch Coast the other night where a Norwegian has come up with a working model for creating electricity through osmosis.

Very clever, completely green and in the UK we have an abundance of the fresh and sea water that would be needed.

_________________
Fogmeister I ventured into Solitude but didn't really do much.
jonbwfc I was behind her in a queue today - but I wouldn't describe it as 'bushy'.


Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:42 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 6580
Location: Getting there
Reply with quote
Did anyone watch that program called "The Cell"?

It was all about the discovery etc... of cells and so on.

Given what they were saying towardss the end of the 3 parter surely they will soon be able to manufacture cells that can transform CO2 into O2 thus eliminating the fact that we have to store the CO2 somewhere.

If you missed it then it's definitely worth a watch. It's on iPlayer.

_________________
Oliver Foggin - iPhone Dev

JJW009 wrote:
The count will go up until they stop counting. That's the way counting works.


Doodle Sub!
Game Of Life

Image Image


Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:10 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
Once again we're after spending money to try to prevent something over which we have little control, instead of spending it to cope with the changes that are inevitable anyway.

I despair. I really do.

I sort of agree, but given the amount of deforestation we, as a species, have done over the last century or so, it isn't as stupid as it sounds - although putting up real trees might be better... :?

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:26 pm
Profile ICQ
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
Fogmeister wrote:
Did anyone watch that program called "The Cell"?

It was all about the discovery etc... of cells and so on.

Given what they were saying towardss the end of the 3 parter surely they will soon be able to manufacture cells that can transform CO2 into O2 thus eliminating the fact that we have to store the CO2 somewhere.

If you missed it then it's definitely worth a watch. It's on iPlayer.


I missed the second part, so I’ll see if they still have that available. It was very interesting, but I’m cautious as today’s solution could well become tomorrow’s problem.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:31 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:57 am
Posts: 1652
Reply with quote
big_D wrote:
although putting up real trees might be better... :?


And cheaper

_________________
A Mac user Image


Thu Aug 27, 2009 7:09 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
Fogmeister wrote:
Did anyone watch that program called "The Cell"?

It was all about the discovery etc... of cells and so on.

Given what they were saying towardss the end of the 3 parter surely they will soon be able to manufacture cells that can transform CO2 into O2 thus eliminating the fact that we have to store the CO2 somewhere.

If you missed it then it's definitely worth a watch. It's on iPlayer.

I'll see if I can catch that tomorrow. I agree that converting CO2 is a far better idea than trying to hide it under the carpet.

Ideally, what we need is some clever cells that take CO2 and H2O and combine them using solar power to generate O2 and hydrocarbons or hydrocarbates, which could be used as fuel for vehicles or stored underground where it would eventually fossilise. On a large scale, this photosynthetic carbon recycling plant might be called something like "Factory Of Remarkable Recycling Evolved Solar Technology".

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Fri Aug 28, 2009 2:16 am
Profile WWW
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 228
Reply with quote
JJW009 wrote:
Ideally, what we need is some clever cells that take CO2 and H2O and combine them using solar power to generate O2 and hydrocarbons or hydrocarbates, which could be used as fuel for vehicles or stored underground where it would eventually fossilise. On a large scale, this photosynthetic carbon recycling plant might be called something like "Factory Of Remarkable Recycling Evolved Solar Technology".


Heard that somewhere before. :lol:

It'll never catch on though....


Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:00 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 9 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.