View unanswered posts | View active topics
It is currently Mon Aug 18, 2025 10:40 pm
'Piracy' student Richard O'Dwyer loses extradition case
Author |
Message |
ProfessorF
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm Posts: 12030
|

 |  |  |  | Quote: 'Piracy' student Richard O'Dwyer loses extradition case
A Sheffield student can be extradited to the US to face copyright infringement allegations, a judge has ruled.
Richard O'Dwyer, 23, set up the TVShack website which US authorities say hosts links to pirated copyrighted films and television programmes.
The Sheffield Hallam University student lost his case in a hearing at Westminster Magistrates' Court.
If found guilty in a US court he could face up to five years in jail.
Mr O'Dwyer's lawyer, Ben Cooper, indicated during the hearing that he would appeal against the ruling.
Mr Cooper said the website did not store copyright material itself and merely directed users to other sites, making it similar to Google.
He also argued that his client, who would be the first British citizen to be extradited for such an offence, was being used as a "guinea pig" for copyright law in the US.
But District Judge Quentin Purdy ruled the extradition could go ahead.
Mr O'Dwyer's mother, Julia O'Dwyer, from Chesterfield, has described the moves by US authorities as "beyond belief" and described Britain's extradition treaty with the United States as "rotten".
Speaking before the hearing, Mr O'Dwyer said he was "surprised" when police officers from the UK and America seized equipment at his home in South Yorkshire in November 2010.
However, no criminal charges followed from the UK authorities.
The case was brought by the US Customs and Border Protection agency, which claims that the TVShack.net website earned "over $230,000 in advertising revenue" before US authorities obtained a warrant and seized the domain name |  |  |  |  |
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-16544335I imagine Google, Bing and Yahoo will be also be had up on this charge?
|
Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:00 pm |
|
 |
Linux_User
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm Posts: 7173
|
It's quite clear that particular website had a particular purpose, which is an important consideration - especially when trying to draw comparisons with generic search engines.
However, the major problem I have with this case is that UK authorities took no action, effectively paving the way for his extradition; the cynic in me wonders whether such a decision was deliberate.
|
Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:03 pm |
|
 |
l3v1ck
What's a life?
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am Posts: 12700 Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
|
Oh. Let's just assume for a second that he is guilty..... Why isn't he being tried in the UK for breaking copyright law?
|
Sat Jan 14, 2012 3:19 pm |
|
 |
Linux_User
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm Posts: 7173
|
I expect because the penalty under UK law is pitiful, so the government's bowing to pressure from the US.
|
Sat Jan 14, 2012 3:23 pm |
|
 |
finlay666
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm Posts: 4876 Location: Newcastle
|
I also suspect the copyright being registered in the US also has impact
_________________TwitterCharlie Brooker: Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.
|
Sat Jan 14, 2012 4:09 pm |
|
 |
pcernie
Legend
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm Posts: 45931 Location: Belfast
|
_________________Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:
http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/
|
Sat Jan 14, 2012 8:13 pm |
|
 |
james016
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 5:52 pm Posts: 1899
|
So when is the UK going to sort out that damn treaty with the U.S.A? Probably never. 
_________________ My Flickr PageNow with added ball and chain.
|
Sat Jan 14, 2012 9:01 pm |
|
 |
finlay666
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm Posts: 4876 Location: Newcastle
|
Depends on where the machine was physically located that served the site, if country laws apply to visitors of the site. One big cluster**** and a lot of money for the solicitors though
_________________TwitterCharlie Brooker: Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.
|
Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:58 am |
|
 |
big_D
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm Posts: 10691 Location: Bramsche
|
It is an international crime... The US are prosecuting him for stealing US works. The UK could prosecute him for UK infringements. If he also had French, German, Italian, Australian etc. works linked through his site, I would expect them to try and extradite him as well. At the end of the day, he must have known that the site was illegal. I also feel this is a much better response than SOPA, PIPA or the Open Act that are currently being considered in America. They should go after the source of the problem and not try and destroy the fabric of the internet.
_________________ "Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari
Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246
|
Sun Jan 15, 2012 11:22 am |
|
 |
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm Posts: 17040
|

He hasn't stolen a damn thing. Nobody is even claiming he has. Certainly so, but what he's done isn't a crime in pretty much any part of the world. It's debatable if it's a crime in the US. However the treaty under which he is being extradited requires very little in the way of cause to activate. Put it this way, the amount of justification required for someone to be extradited under this treaty is not even enough to get someone charged, either in the US or the the UK. The ready does not conform to the standards we expect our justice systems to conform to. That, and the fact the treaty is one way - note the case where two US air force pilots attacked British forces in Iraq and the US refused to allow them to come to the UK to take part in court proceedings, so it's OK for them to drag people across for setting up a web site, but we can't drag people across for manslaughter. The treaty is unfair and unjust and that's why this is a story, not really the details of what he actually did. The internet is not valuable above society or the people in it. Jon
|
Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:20 pm |
|
 |
Linux_User
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm Posts: 7173
|
People should not be extradited for "crimes" which are not crimes in the United Kingdom. Under English Law copyright infringement is a civil tort.
|
Sun Jan 15, 2012 1:14 pm |
|
 |
big_D
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm Posts: 10691 Location: Bramsche
|
If the crime had been restricted to the UK, then yes. But what he was doing was affecting rights holders in other lands.
I don't see this as much different to Nike, Rebok, Chanel etc. getting shops and factories etc. closed down. In most cases, those crimes are treated locally, because they are carried out locally. In this case, the crime is being "carried out" globally, so I don't see anything wrong with the rights holders affected wanting the prosecution to take place in their jurisdiction.
_________________ "Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari
Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246
|
Sun Jan 15, 2012 2:43 pm |
|
 |
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm Posts: 17040
|
He hasn't committed a crime. His actions are in breach of civil law, not criminal law. Which makes it a case for litigation, not prosecution. People should not get extradited for civil actions. It's ludicrous. What he has done may be immoral (almost certainly) and may have lost several large corporations money (debatable) but it is simply not a crime. Selling counterfeit goods is a crime. Making counterfeit goods is a crime. Telling somebody which market stall they are available at isn't. You can't just go making the law up as you go along. Aside from the blatantly obvious fact that he hasn't been involved in any sort of counterfeiting, so it's actually pretty irrelevant as an example. Yes, because 200 years of international trading law and the Berne Convention were so useless, we need to just tear them up and do whatever comes immediately to mind Jon
|
Sun Jan 15, 2012 4:06 pm |
|
 |
Linux_User
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm Posts: 7173
|
TBH I'm highly disturbed by the idea that someone may do something on the internet which is not a crime in the United Kingdom, but then gets extradited because it's a crime in France, the US etc. British citizens who are resident within the United Kingdom & have committed no crime in said Kingdom should not be subject to the laws of other jurisdictions.
Also big_D, UK law makes a very important distinction between Trade Marks & copyright infringement.
|
Sun Jan 15, 2012 4:11 pm |
|
 |
l3v1ck
What's a life?
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am Posts: 12700 Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
|
See, with Gary What'shisface, I think he should go as the computers he hacked were in the USA.
In this case he shouldn't as the USA has no link to this at all.
|
Sun Jan 15, 2012 9:57 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|