Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
The end for Turbo-Nutters 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
clicky

Quote:
Broadwell, the 14nm successor to next year’s Haswell CPU, will essentially shut out the enthusiast. Motherboards will still be available, but the CPUs that come with them will be soldered down. . .

. . . since they nearly destroyed that nascent market with Nehalem, and have since progressively removed any features the enthusiast cares about while jacking the cost to buy them back to untenable levels, enthusiasts have become an endangered species. Unfortunately Intel doesn’t care about the enthusiast


So, anyone here planning to over-clock into the next decade? I've not bothered for years, since my ancient Duo is still fast enough for most of what I need. Most of the computers I've bought in the last 5 years or so have actually been low powered devices powered by Atoms and the like. If I ever buy another one, it's likely to be a Pi!

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:22 am
Profile WWW
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Could this give AMD a bigger niche to play in, or are they too far gone now? Did I read there that the overclockers are using ARM chips now?

Anyway, I predict US law suits at the very least ;)

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:42 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
Did I read there that the overclockers are using ARM chips now?

It does say that in the article I linked to. Some impressive results, but not relevant to the Desktop at the moment.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:56 am
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
JJW009 wrote:
So, anyone here planning to over-clock into the next decade?
I haven't overclocked since my motherboard blew up in my last desktop a few years ago. Since then I've only had laptops, so overclocking hasn't been an option.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:50 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
The last CPU I overclocked was my Phenom II.

At the moment I'm running an i7 3770 and I won't be overclocking it.

Sent from my LT26i using Tapatalk 2

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:11 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
Could this give AMD a bigger niche to play in, or are they too far gone now? Did I read there that the overclockers are using ARM chips now?

I think it's Intel getting cocky. The think (quite understandably so) that AMD CPU's are so poor at the moment, that people will still buy Intel even if they lock them in with 'features' that they don't want. I doubt you'd see this if AMD CPU's were more competative.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:16 am
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
I've never overclocked.

And I stopped building my own machines back in 2004.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:12 am
Profile ICQ
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
My last overclocking rig was a Q6600 I got rid of when I bough the iMac (2011). Even if I bought a gaming rig today I'd be happy with an Intel 'i' at stock speeds to be honest.

That said I'd still prefer to buy my motherboard and CPU independently and have the option to upgrade one without the other.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Wed Nov 28, 2012 9:12 am
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
JJW009 wrote:
pcernie wrote:
Did I read there that the overclockers are using ARM chips now?

It does say that in the article I linked to. Some impressive results, but not relevant to the Desktop at the moment.


People are over clocking their Raspberry Pis, which to me sounds RISCy.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Wed Nov 28, 2012 10:03 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
big_D wrote:
I've never overclocked.

And I stopped building my own machines back in 2004.

Same here. It does appeal to a minority but suspect that some manufacturers will be allowed to order different motherboards that have better performance.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:18 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:46 pm
Posts: 10022
Reply with quote
I would have thought that there would be a natural decline in overclocking as machines became vastly more powerful for the software they run on anyway. I recall AMD giving Intel a run for their money back with their Athlon XP processors. What happened to AMD after that?

_________________
Image
He fights for the users.


Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:20 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
cloaked_wolf wrote:
What happened to AMD after that?

They were out-gunned. It's a horrendously expensive task to design and fabricate new powerful processors.

However, I do think they could make a bit of a comeback by pricing clockable processors at the budget end.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:38 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:06 pm
Posts: 6355
Location: IoW
Reply with quote
I still overclock. My venerable i7 920 is running at 4.2GHz and has hit 4.63GHz under bench conditions.

If Intel start locking down integrated processors to stock speeds, hopefully AMD will carry a torch for us a little longer - if they can afford to be interested in niche markets. Although, the prices will probably take a hike skywards.

Maybe I can try overclocking my toaster or microwave, to get my fix.

_________________
Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes; after that, who cares?! He's a mile away and you've got his shoes!


Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:55 am
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
My one and only OC was an E6300 and that was only cos I could :oops:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:26 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
cloaked_wolf wrote:
I would have thought that there would be a natural decline in overclocking as machines became vastly more powerful for the software they run on anyway.
Plus modern CPU's overclock themselves when only a few cores are being used.
cloaked_wolf wrote:
I recall AMD giving Intel a run for their money back with their Athlon XP processors. What happened to AMD after that?
Athlon 64. Those trounced Intel too. What happened next was Intel went back to the drawing board and started from scratch while AMD rested on their laurels and only made minor changes for the next 7/8 years.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Wed Nov 28, 2012 7:30 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.