Author |
Message |
pcernie
Legend
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm Posts: 45931 Location: Belfast
|
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-33110575 I think less of Oz every day because of it's current government.
_________________Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:
http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/
|
Fri Jun 12, 2015 11:00 pm |
|
 |
big_D
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm Posts: 10691 Location: Bramsche
|
We need to stop talking about taking in refugees or sending them back and actually do something about the problem of why there are refugees in the first place...
_________________ "Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari
Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246
|
Sat Jun 13, 2015 7:17 am |
|
 |
l3v1ck
What's a life?
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am Posts: 12700 Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
|
That's easier said than done. And even if you sort out the source of refugees, you'll still have a source of economic migrants (which is a whole different issue).
|
Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:19 pm |
|
 |
ShockWaffle
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am Posts: 1911
|
And in the decades / centuries that it will take for all the nasty aspects of all the countries in the world to get fixed ... just [LIFTED] 'em and let them drown?
|
Sat Jun 13, 2015 5:38 pm |
|
 |
MrStevenRogers
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:44 pm Posts: 4860
|
_________________ Hope this helps . . . Steve ...
Nothing known travels faster than light, except bad news ... HP Pavilion 24" AiO. Ryzen7u. 32GB/1TB M2. Windows 11 Home ...
|
Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:09 pm |
|
 |
big_D
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm Posts: 10691 Location: Bramsche
|
I seem to have worded that poorly. The key word is talking here.
We need to stop complaining about taking in refugees (in the news in politics) and start talking about how we can stem the flow by helping improve conditions in the countries where they are coming from.
I wasn't trying to suggest that we just close our borders and send them all back. Just that this is the wrong end of the argument to be concentrating on.
_________________ "Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari
Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246
|
Sun Jun 14, 2015 6:49 am |
|
 |
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm Posts: 17040
|
Quite so. The best way to deal with migrants is to set things so they don't want to migrate in the first place.
|
Sun Jun 14, 2015 9:31 am |
|
 |
MrStevenRogers
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:44 pm Posts: 4860
|
are you suggesting a major military operation in that area ? the only way to stop this is turn the boats back or never let them leave or total war and i mean total war as they are invading and IS give no quarter, your choice you choose ...
_________________ Hope this helps . . . Steve ...
Nothing known travels faster than light, except bad news ... HP Pavilion 24" AiO. Ryzen7u. 32GB/1TB M2. Windows 11 Home ...
|
Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:55 pm |
|
 |
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm Posts: 17040
|
That's what caused the problems a big chunk of them are fleeing. The only thing that will solve the problem is making the places they are running away from safe and moderately prosperous so they feel like staying. Anything else is just putting your proverbial finger over the burst pipe. You want to turn the whole of the Northern African coast into some sort of prison camp? I hope you're willing to pay the tremendous increase in taxes such a massive military operation would require. We'd need to significantly increase the size of the navy and buy a good few more AWACS style aircraft for a start. That's a few billion pounds a year and we haven't even got into manpower or logistic costs. Unless you expect someone else (e.g. the Italians) to actually do all the work, which they're certainly not going to just because we ask them nicely. Got no problem with fighting IS. These people in general aren't them though. Jon
|
Sun Jun 14, 2015 5:41 pm |
|
 |
AlunD
Site Admin
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am Posts: 7011 Location: Wiltshire
|
I don't know what the solution is but just letting them flood into European and other better off countries isn't it.
_________________ <input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />
|
Mon Jun 15, 2015 6:43 am |
|
 |
ShockWaffle
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am Posts: 1911
|
All wealthy countries should accept far more asylum seekers, even those who do only fear bullying and poverty rather than torture and dismemberment.
We should be less dickish about it too. Let them get jobs and remit money to their homelands. That's often a very good form of international development aid.
We aren't too crowded to take them, and we aren't too poor to help. We're just selfish areseholes who won't.
|
Mon Jun 15, 2015 7:42 am |
|
 |
TheFrenchun
Officially Mrs saspro
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:55 pm Posts: 4955 Location: on the naughty step
|
I still wonder why they all come to Europe which everybody in the world knows is dying on its feet rather than Asia or Middle East?
|
Mon Jun 15, 2015 11:18 am |
|
 |
AlunD
Site Admin
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am Posts: 7011 Location: Wiltshire
|
And we are rich how? Suggest you go live in a country you are happier with then.
_________________ <input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />
|
Mon Jun 15, 2015 12:09 pm |
|
 |
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm Posts: 17040
|

To be fair, the cost of housing a few thousand immigrants would be a proverbial drop in the ocean to our national debt. The cost issues aren't on that scale at all. There are legitimate questions to ask about how many asylum seekers we can afford to take in, but the fact it might raise the level of our national debt by 0.0001% isn't really a relevant question. There's no shame in saying 'We can afford to spend this much money on supporting asylum seekers, that means we can accept this many'. That's a perfectly fair thing. The question is how we decide how much that number is. The fact is these people are in the main desperate - if they weren't, they wouldn't be crowing onto unsafe boats and risking being drowned at sea - and therefore deserve our help but there are also many people already in the UK who need help also and there's only a finite amount of money to go round. This is not a black or white 'take all or take none' decision and anyone standing on either of those soapboxes is not looking at the problem at all realistically.
|
Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:30 pm |
|
 |
AlunD
Site Admin
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am Posts: 7011 Location: Wiltshire
|
Sorry but I think it is. The UK infrastructure is falling apart ( Roads, Rail, water, power generation etc ) , The UK social infrastructure is collapsing ( NHS , Police, pensions etc ) Lets get those things sorted out and our debt reduced first and accept the fact that we are no longer a world power but a struggling second class country. </rant> Not fundamentally disagreeing with you but lets sort our own house out first.
_________________ <input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />
|
Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:59 pm |
|
|