Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
VAT 'will rise' under coalition government 
Author Message
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
We've all gotta pay for this [LIFTED] somehow. At least with a VAT increase, I can choose to cut down in certain areas. With income tax, I have no choice. Let it go innit.

As for this:

TheFrenchun wrote:
VAT rises... people buy less. Shop close, factory go out of business. More unemployed oh dear!


Whatever you cut, or increase tax on will have a similar effect. No need to be so melodramatic. I see bus loads of EU immigrants flower-picking and cleaning down here because Brits won't do it, because they're too comfy on benefits. They are wider issues here and we could on and on.

Fact is, we're in debt. Doesn't matter who's fault it is. We've all gotta chip in.

BUt that is the point about an increase in income tax you are all paying it. With VAT it will be mainly the poor and middle class that will be paying it. If you are very rich you can afford to only need to spend a small fraction of your income on anything that attracts VAT.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Thu May 13, 2010 1:12 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:44 pm
Posts: 4141
Location: Exeter
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
BUt that is the point about an increase in income tax you are all paying it. With VAT it will be mainly the poor and middle class that will be paying it. If you are very rich you can afford to only need to spend a small fraction of your income on anything that attracts VAT.


But here's a thought. The people generally worst effected by VAT increases are as you rightly point out the lower and middle classes. This is also incidently the major portion of the Labour demographic. Since they've spent the last 13 years voting in the most incompetent bunch of cowboys ever to grace parliament, in particular when it comes to fiscal policy and balancing the books, isn't it only fair that they are the ones to carry the cost of their own stupid voting.

_________________
"The woman is a riddle inside a mystery wrapped in an enigma I've had sex with."


Thu May 13, 2010 1:24 pm
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
jonlumb wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
BUt that is the point about an increase in income tax you are all paying it. With VAT it will be mainly the poor and middle class that will be paying it. If you are very rich you can afford to only need to spend a small fraction of your income on anything that attracts VAT.


But here's a thought. The people generally worst effected by VAT increases are as you rightly point out the lower and middle classes. This is also incidently the major portion of the Labour demographic. Since they've spent the last 13 years voting in the most incompetent bunch of cowboys ever to grace parliament, in particular when it comes to fiscal policy and balancing the books, isn't it only fair that they are the ones to carry the cost of their own stupid voting.


Yes and no. I think my thoughts on colour-based politics are known by now.

Since when do the rich pay less VAT? Since when do they buy less stuff that incurs VAT? Am I missing something???

For me, 2.5% on VAT will be significantly cheaper than 2.5% on income and I earn well under the national average.


Thu May 13, 2010 1:54 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
I think that, given the increase in the tax free portion of our wages, a small VAT rise is fair.

Increasing VAT is better than increasing income tax, in my opinion, because it hits everyone - whether they are working, or not. Whether they even live in the country or not, they will still pay it.

It's often said that people don't work because life is too easy on benefits. Well, by increasing the VAT those people pay on all their luxuries, and increasing the personal allowance, it adds up to an incentive to work in my eyes.

_________________
Image


Thu May 13, 2010 2:02 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:44 pm
Posts: 4141
Location: Exeter
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
Yes and no. I think my thoughts on colour-based politics are known by now.

Since when do the rich pay less VAT? Since when do they buy less stuff that incurs VAT? Am I missing something???

For me, 2.5% on VAT will be significantly cheaper than 2.5% on income and I earn well under the national average.


The rich tend to pay a lot less on VAT as a proportion of their income in comparison to people on lower income because they often save / invest a significant proportion of their income, which incurs no VAT at all.

They still pay more in absolute amounts.

_________________
"The woman is a riddle inside a mystery wrapped in an enigma I've had sex with."


Thu May 13, 2010 2:05 pm
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Nick wrote:
I think that, given the increase in the tax free portion of our wages, a small VAT rise is fair.

Increasing VAT is better than increasing income tax, in my opinion, because it hits everyone - whether they are working, or not. Whether they even live in the country or not, they will still pay it.

It's often said that people don't work because life is too easy on benefits. Well, by increasing the VAT those people pay on all their luxuries, and increasing the personal allowance, it adds up to an incentive to work in my eyes.

Yes but the government will have to up their benefits otherwise they would all fall below the poverty line and then face the criticism that they are making the poor even poorer to fund tax cuts for the rich, which they will do inevitably. It will also hit pensioners very hard who are on fixed incomes. With the increase in personal allowances a big increase in income from tax allowance will be swallowed up in VAT.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Thu May 13, 2010 2:16 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
For me, 2.5% on VAT will be significantly cheaper than 2.5% on income and I earn well under the national average.

Even after the £700 tax back from the personal allowance increase?

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Thu May 13, 2010 2:17 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
Nick wrote:
luxuries


Quite.

jonlumb wrote:
They still pay more in absolute amounts.


Exactement.

Amnesia10 wrote:
okenobi wrote:
For me, 2.5% on VAT will be significantly cheaper than 2.5% on income and I earn well under the national average.

Even after the £700 tax back from the personal allowance increase?


Whatever happens to the personal increase is a separate issue. Yes, I will be better off with a VAT increase, because to an extent I can choose to avoid it AND it doesn't apply across all of my money/income/outgoings.


Thu May 13, 2010 2:34 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
Whatever happens to the personal increase is a separate issue. Yes, I will be better off with a VAT increase, because to an extent I can choose to avoid it AND it doesn't apply across all of my money/income/outgoings.


What, by buying kids clothes and eating bread for the rest of your life? :?

_________________
Image


Thu May 13, 2010 2:37 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
Whatever happens to the personal increase is a separate issue. Yes, I will be better off with a VAT increase, because to an extent I can choose to avoid it AND it doesn't apply across all of my money/income/outgoings.

But you have to look at the impact overall. What if the choice was 1% income tax or 2.5% VAT increase?

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Thu May 13, 2010 2:48 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
Nick wrote:
okenobi wrote:
Whatever happens to the personal increase is a separate issue. Yes, I will be better off with a VAT increase, because to an extent I can choose to avoid it AND it doesn't apply across all of my money/income/outgoings.


What, by buying kids clothes and eating bread for the rest of your life? :?


Point taken. I'm talking about luxury consumer goods that I can stop buying if I choose.

Amnesia, your choice is hypothetical atm, but whatever the numbers, I don't care. I expect VAT to go up at some point, it's not a big deal and whichever way you slice it, it's still leaves more choice than an income tax rise.

Either way, we don't get a choice, so why moan?


Thu May 13, 2010 5:21 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:23 pm
Posts: 710
Reply with quote
VAT is an "easy" tax. Just put it up and someone else collects it and it can't be avoided.

Yes it's unfair and hits the poorest harder, but gives quick and predictable income.

_________________
No Apples were used in the making of this post.


Thu May 13, 2010 7:31 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
jonlumb wrote:
Since they've spent the last 13 years voting in the most incompetent bunch of cowboys ever to grace parliament, in particular when it comes to fiscal policy and balancing the books, isn't it only fair that they are the ones to carry the cost of their own stupid voting.


In fairness, the Tories made a proper meal of it as well - do you recall Norman Lamont and Black Wednesday?

A VAT increase taxes everyone, so while those of us on the lower end of the pay scale have our taxable income raised above £10k, we're no better off due to a VAT rise.
What a surprise. The point of a society should for those who can to help those who can't (not won't). Why not tax it off the top end instead? That means those of us on a minimum wage can afford to pay rent and be self sufficient, but Mr £100k p/annum loses a round of golf, maybe a Rolex.
Oh wait, that's right, because if you're on a minimum wage you're simply not trying hard enough or are clearly a benefits cheat. :roll:
An unfair tax rise, IMHO.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Thu May 13, 2010 7:43 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 5048
Reply with quote
Talk of a VAT increase is also a psychological tact to encourage people to buy those things that they were going to buy sooner rather than later to help with recovery.

I'm not going to get into a who was worse, Labour or the last Tory Government. There's no competition. Thatcher and her ilk were insane and did their best to destroy any sort of cohesive society that there was.

_________________
Fogmeister I ventured into Solitude but didn't really do much.
jonbwfc I was behind her in a queue today - but I wouldn't describe it as 'bushy'.


Fri May 14, 2010 7:21 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 1:03 pm
Posts: 5041
Location: London
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:

A VAT increase taxes everyone, so while those of us on the lower end of the pay scale have our taxable income raised above £10k, we're no better off due to a VAT rise.
What a surprise. The point of a society should for those who can to help those who can't (not won't). Why not tax it off the top end instead? That means those of us on a minimum wage can afford to pay rent and be self sufficient, but Mr £100k p/annum loses a round of golf, maybe a Rolex.
Oh wait, that's right, because if you're on a minimum wage you're simply not trying hard enough or are clearly a benefits cheat. :roll:
An unfair tax rise, IMHO.

One big advantage of VAT is that it almost impossible even for top earners not to pay. For income tax they can find 101 loopholes to get out of paying it. For Vat its collected at the point of sale so you have no choice.

Unfortunately our tax system is very complex and while ordinary people like us who pay tax via PAYE cannot avoid it as soon as you start getting your income from other ways then there are many legal ways in not paying / reducing tax

_________________
John_Vella wrote:
OK, so all we need to do is find a half African, half Chinese, half Asian, gay, one eyed, wheelchair bound dwarf with tourettes and a lisp, and a st st stutter and we could make the best panel show ever.


Fri May 14, 2010 8:29 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.