Reply to topic  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Spain's strict new anti-smoking rules take effect 
Author Message
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 4876
Location: Newcastle
Reply with quote
snowyweston wrote:
DaftFunk wrote:
Non smokers will feel obliged to go to the smoking ones because of smoking friends
And vice versa.

You really are quite blinkered on this aren't you? I don't smoke around my mate's children, nor smoke in the non-smoking homes of my mates. I still go round though. Why? It's called mutual respect.


This

Just because someone occasionally does something doesn't mean they will keep doing it around those that don't.

I don't smoke when I'm at my gfs or someone is in my car, if I want to smoke at home I go outside (because I live with non smokers)

I don't expect my gf to start smoking when we go out for a drink, and she doesn't expect me to stop*



*well, she would like me to.... but I have my reasons for not quitting at the minute

_________________
Twitter
Charlie Brooker:
Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.


Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:50 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:28 pm
Posts: 851
Location: EC1 Baby!
Reply with quote
DaftFunk wrote:
You say there should/could be a middle ground, yes that's correct, but what is it? Until a middle ground, a smoking ban in public spaces just makes sense.
Firstly, can we clear up what we both mean by "public space" ? Personally I do not consider a pubs, restaurants, shops of any place of business, a "public space". They are all privately owned spaces to which Mr & Mrs Average are welcomed, so long as they abide by the rules imposed by the owners of said establishments. Some shops have a "no hats" policy and most banks have a "no motorbike helmets" policy. Those policies haven't become law, and smoking should have been treated in the same way.... ie. "You're welcome, so long as you know, and appreciate, we allow / don't allow (delete as appropriate) smoking"

DaftFunk wrote:
One question is how do you enforce venues to be non-smoking? As we've agreed venues will choose to be smoking to pull in more business, which is great, however everyone will choose to do the same.
As is their right. They are offering a service and shouldn't feel obliged (or be forced by law) to curtail their profits to appease the want of non-smokers. Again, a restauranter chooses to only use GM food, where another may only offer organic; both demographics are catered for and people will vote with their feet. It works.

DaftFunk wrote:
Then there is no choice for non-smokers who are in the majority, so the government has to take business choice away from businesses and enforce a certain percentage be non-smoking.
I'm not sure why you immediately think some places wouldn't choose to be non-smoking. I imagine many places would so they could be "that nice, smoke free restaurant down the road" - and that there would lie their fortune, with "the majority" queuing at their door. I picture(d) it would be better in the long run for all of us (the public) as a trade war between non-smoking and smoking establishments would ensue - with each catering for their diehard clientele whilst competing to tempt away the competition's with better services.

...and regarding my response to Lev,
DaftFunk wrote:
I don't think it's a bit of stale smoke that's the issue, passive smoking reduces life expectancy and leads to diseases. It's a fact.
Agreed. Again I'm not stupid. But I signed a late night hours waiver (amongst others) when I worked in premises licensed to serve alcohol past midnight, and would have happily done so had there been one for "I acknowledge and respect the right of my employer to permit smoking on their premises during my work hours" - had I had issues with such a waiver, I'd have not signed it, collected by bag, and left the job. And not expected a penny of severance or compensation because of it. Like I've already said, there are plenty of other jobs.


Last edited by snowyweston on Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:51 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:38 am
Posts: 2967
Location: Dorchester, Dorset
Reply with quote
Smoking is a legal activity btw peeps.

_________________
I've finally invented something that works!

A Mac User.


Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:57 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:38 am
Posts: 2967
Location: Dorchester, Dorset
Reply with quote
Also, snowy's right. I really can't be arsed to argue about it on an iPhone keypad, so whatever snowy says.

_________________
I've finally invented something that works!

A Mac User.


Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:01 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
snowyweston wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
As far as governments are concerned if you are jobless you practically have no option to refuse a job if it is suitable.
Exactly! Bar/restaurant work (pre and post ban) is an exceptionally attractive job - there are a great, great many other jobs far "worse" than one where you might (God forbid) come home smelling a bit of stale smoke... To paint bar/restaurant work as the last resort of the desperate is quite frankly, insulting.
\
I did bar work in the past. It was a great way of socialising and getting paid at the same time. The smoke made it tough on the throat. I cannot do that now because of the amnesia. I cannot do mental arithmetic any longer.

snowyweston wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
As a non smoker I do support a smoking ban. Though I do see the other side that smokers are addicts, so should we also have shooting galleries for junkies in pubs?
No, because Heroin (I presume) is presently an illegal substance. Were it not, then there would probably be dedicated centres for such, but if a pub/restaurant wanted to encourage and welcome such patrons, and had been given the fair right to choose to do so (with the same kind of waiver I proposed for smoking) then why not?

I was being sarcastic. Though I still think that a smoking ban is fine. Mainly because of the impact on non smoking staff.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:03 am
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:28 pm
Posts: 851
Location: EC1 Baby!
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
I was being sarcastic.
I kind of got that feeling, but it was a good Devil's Advocate question to answer in my efforts to illustrate my thinking. Sorry. ;)


Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:12 am
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 3:39 pm
Posts: 478
Location: Peterborough
Reply with quote
I'm not going to argue my point any longer.

I'm glad the smoking ban is in effect, the majority will benefit from cleaner air and longer lives. However people should be permitted to smoke, although without putting others at risk. Also if it appeared I was implying you are stupid, that was not my intention.

_________________
Image


Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:13 am
Profile WWW
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:28 pm
Posts: 851
Location: EC1 Baby!
Reply with quote
DaftFunk wrote:
I'm not going to argue my point any longer.
Pity.


Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:23 am
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 3:39 pm
Posts: 478
Location: Peterborough
Reply with quote
snowyweston wrote:
DaftFunk wrote:
I'm not going to argue my point any longer.
Pity.


Never mind.

_________________
Image


Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:33 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
I really like a spliff.

Is it pathetic that I sometimes choose to party in a private house with like minded friends because it's banned in public places?

Cannibalise legalists, man!

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:35 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
snowyweston wrote:
I mean, you both really, really enjoy smoking.


I'm sorry but the perceived 'enjoyment' from smoking comes purely from the satisfying of the addiction. This isnt my opinion btw, it has come from every single person I know who has successfully kicked the habit.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Thu Jan 06, 2011 8:54 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm
Posts: 5161
Location: /dev/tty0
Reply with quote
veato wrote:
I'm sorry but the perceived 'enjoyment' from smoking comes purely from the satisfying of the addiction.


I don't particularly buy into that. I'm an occasional smoker, perhaps one night ever month or two, and I get great pleasure from smoking my pipe. I don't crave it, I might fancy a smoke as one might fancy a pickled egg when they order chips...For me it is a luxury, like the tot of rum I might have from time to time...


Thu Jan 06, 2011 9:37 am
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
I think that's an illogical position. Most of the things people 'enjoy' can be traced back to a biochemical process within the human body. That's just because our sensations are largely governed by the biological processes we are undergoing at the time. Nice bit of cake? That's mostly reinforced sugar rush. Downhill skiing or snowboarding (or a goal being scored or a wicket being taken)? Adrenaline. Good session at the gym? That's mainly through getting a big dopamine hit.

If you don't like smoking and smokers there are plenty of valid arguments. But the fact people enjoy smoking mainly as a result of an internal biochemical process isn't one of them, because that's true of pretty near everything people enjoy, healthy or not.

Jon


Thu Jan 06, 2011 9:40 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
tombolt wrote:
Smoking is a legal activity btw peeps.
Only because the government makes a shed load of cash out of it. They've banned everything else that people seem to enjoy.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Thu Jan 06, 2011 9:52 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
veato wrote:
I'm sorry but the perceived 'enjoyment' from smoking comes purely from the satisfying of the addiction. This isnt my opinion btw, it has come from every single person I know who has successfully kicked the habit.

Okay - I'll rise to this one. FYI I kicked several habits in 2000/2001 - drink, cigarettes and other naughty things...

IME there are three very different kinds of enjoyment associated with addictive substances. There's the "relief" enjoyment that comes from the soothing of a craving - e.g. the emergency cigarette, chocolate, coffee, spliff etc.. Then there's the unthinking, "habitual" enjoyment that comes from satisfying a routine - e.g. eating breakfast with a coffee, tea, cigarette, spliff etc. or perhaps social smoking in a pub - where the enjoyment comes from doing what you always just do.

But there exists a third, often unmentioned, kind of enjoyment that is quite separate from the other two. For example, my father-in-law lives in Saxony and in his expansive back garden he has a porch swing (see picture below for example) that I love to sit on during long, hot, lazy summer days. At these times I sometimes sit with my wife whilst enjoying the lovely mountain air, the sounds of birds singing, a cool Köstritzer and a cigarette. I might only smoke one in a day and only 3 or 4 in a holiday and there are no cravings. It's not the satisfaction of a craving - it's just enjoyable in a very gemütlichkeit kind of way.

Image

Hope this helps,

_________________
Jim

Image


Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:10 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.