Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
wedding, weddding, wedddding....etc 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
jonbwfc wrote:
Well there's beautiful, there's elegant and there's sexy and they aren't all the same thing. Personally, I don't think it's 'seemly' for the bride to be too sexy. OK, in the vast majority of cases these days, in the west at least, it's not actually true but there is still the concept that the bride should be.. well, virginal, at least symbolically. You want the bride to be graceful, you want her to be beautiful, you want her to take your breath away but do you actually want her to be 'sexy'? I'm not entirely sure you do.


Unless you're in a Guns n Roses video.


Exactly what I was thinking :lol: :

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x29c6p ... rain_music

Around the 1.30 mark, just seen it described as the 'mullet-dress' :lol:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:22 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
Around the 1.30 mark, just seen it described as the 'mullet-dress' :lol:

That's a perfect description. Business up front, party round the back. Erm...

Anyway. He'll catch his death sleeping with the windows open like that. I'd move my bed away from the window, if it were me.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:44 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
There was even a Top Trumps set released. Presumably, 'playing the racist card with Phil' is actually a good idea :lol:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun May 01, 2011 3:18 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
There was even a Top Trumps set released. Presumably, 'playing the racist card with Phil' is actually a good idea :lol:

'Ability to offend just about anybody : 10!'

Allegedly, the wedding dress cost a quarter of a million. OK, as of about 1PM yesterday it was effectively priceless so it's a good investment but bloody hell.

Jon


Sun May 01, 2011 4:52 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 1:03 pm
Posts: 5041
Location: London
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
Really?
Or were they tourists who were already in the country?
There's really no way to tell how many people travelled specifically from their home country to watch it.

I guess one could look at the average hotel occupancy for the same time last year and see if it was up or not

_________________
John_Vella wrote:
OK, so all we need to do is find a half African, half Chinese, half Asian, gay, one eyed, wheelchair bound dwarf with tourettes and a lisp, and a st st stutter and we could make the best panel show ever.


Mon May 02, 2011 11:19 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
hifidelity2 wrote:
ProfessorF wrote:
Really?
Or were they tourists who were already in the country?
There's really no way to tell how many people travelled specifically from their home country to watch it.

I guess one could look at the average hotel occupancy for the same time last year and see if it was up or not

I did see one of the BBC walkabout reporters interviewing a couple of Australians who said they'd planned their holiday around being in London for the Royal Wedding. Undoubtedly it did attract some people but whether it was enough to make a significant difference, who knows.

I don't think hotel occupancy will cut it TBH - you 'd somehow have to differentiate between those who were foreign and those who were UK residents anyway and then account for their spending differently, as the 'nationals' would have been spending money in London rather than where they normally lived in the UK, so their net spend is lower. You'd be better off looking at pure immigration stats - they'd know how many more people came into the UK from abroad last week compared to the same in previous years.

Jon


Tue May 03, 2011 9:44 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
I don't think hotel occupancy will cut it TBH - you 'd somehow have to differentiate between those who were foreign and those who were UK residents anyway and then account for their spending differently, as the 'nationals' would have been spending money in London rather than where they normally lived in the UK, so their net spend is lower. You'd be better off looking at pure immigration stats - they'd know how many more people came into the UK from abroad last week compared to the same in previous years.

Jon


That would also nicely show how many people left the country because of the wedding.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Tue May 03, 2011 9:46 am
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:38 am
Posts: 2967
Location: Dorchester, Dorset
Reply with quote
hifidelity2 wrote:
I guess one could look at the average hotel occupancy for the same time last year and see if it was up or not


Most of them camped on the street anyway!

_________________
I've finally invented something that works!

A Mac User.


Tue May 03, 2011 11:40 am
Profile
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 8:18 am
Posts: 385
Reply with quote
Not much to say really.

I watched the entire event, unexpectedly really, and enjoyed just about every minute. The enforced commentary by Huw was a little testing at times admittedly.

I thought William should have worn RAF dress suit, Kate looked stunning in that wedding dress and Harry and Pippa didn't put a foot wrong.

Got through a few tinnies and had a lovely time. Moan if you want but I thought it was a spectacular event.


Tue May 03, 2011 3:44 pm
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
PaulKey wrote:
The enforced commentary by Huw was a little testing at times admittedly.


Our Huw really doesn't know when to just shut up and let the pictures speak for themselves. It's like he's afraid to stop talking in case his brain seizes up. He's just not got the gravitas of your Dimbleby, that's for certain.

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Tue May 03, 2011 4:03 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 8:18 am
Posts: 385
Reply with quote
Ahhhhh Heather.....

I felt for him actually. The poor guy was obviously struggling to fill the gaps and on many occasions ended up sounding, shall we say, a little silly. I don't blame him for one minute. He would probably been perfectly happy to comment as and when comment was needed while we watched the pictures but I'm sure he was being told to speak in that tiny ear piece he was wearing.

As my dear wife once said to her then headmaster.... "Sometimes less is more"


Tue May 03, 2011 4:18 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
He's just not got the gravitas of your Dimbleby, that's for certain.


This is the contention of @Dimblebot on Twitter who believes that "Welshman" is probably a product of "Sinclair".

Bio-Dimbeby went on a successful mission to locate the Queen Mother's secret gin store on the day of The Wedding.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Tue May 03, 2011 6:54 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.