A third England footballer has won an injunction to stop claims about his private life going public.
None of the footballers can be named under the terms of the orders
The gagging order, granted by High Court judge Mr Justice Kenneth Parker, bans allegations of a "sexual liaison, encounter or relationship" appearing in the media.
It prevents the publication of "private or personal photographs" stored on a mobile telephone, which was stolen and then offered to national newspapers.
The order follows two other England international players being granted similar injunctions to block reports of claims about their private lives.
None of the footballers can be named under the terms of the legal orders.
Concerns have been raised about the use of injunctions to stop reporting of potentially embarrassing revelations.
There was outrage in 2009 after an injunction granted to the Swiss multinational Trafigura appeared to restrict what MPs could say in Parliament.
Chelsea football captain John Terry was awarded an injunction - later repealed - preventing reporting of information about his alleged affair with Vanessa Perroncel.
The woman used to be in a relationship with his England team-mate Wayne Bridge.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-New ... 8527?f=rss
I'm always torn between thinking they should have a private life and, 'Well, if you're in the public eye and gonna act the git...'
The injunctions themselves are just a nonsense though
