Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Hackers Crack Commercial Quantum Encryption, Leave No Trace 
Author Message
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
Quote:
Quantum Hackers Use Lasers to Crack Commercial Quantum Encryption Without Leaving a Trace
By Clay DillowPosted 08.30.2010 at 5:07 pm

Quantum cryptography is one of the most secure known means of transmitting data, due to the fact that even if a third party does intercept a quantum signal, that interference changes the encryption key, making the tampering apparent to parties at both ends. But a handful of quantum hackers at Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim recently performed successful hacks of two commercial quantum cryptographic systems -- and they did so without leaving a trace.
Quantum encryption is based on the notion that you cannot take measurements of a quantum system without in some way disturbing it. A sender uses standard values of zeros and ones. That key is encoded into a beam of light using two different quantum states of photons. The receiver has a detector that measures the quantum states of the incoming photons. Anyone who messes with the signal in between will change it in some way, making it apparent to the sender and receiver that someone tampered with the signal.

The quantum hackers got around the rules of quantum physics by simply intercepting the incoming signal and generating a brand new one to send on to the receiver. To do so, they shined a continuous 1-milliwatt laser at the receiver's detector, blinding it while they intercepted the sender's signal.
But the trick is in how they blind the receiver's detector. While blinded, it cannot act as a quantum detector, but it still functions as a classical light detector, reading a "one" if an extra bright pulse of light hits it, quantum properties of the light notwithstanding. So as the interceptor receives the sender's signal, it pumps an extra bright pulse of light at the receivers' detector every time it reads a "one" in the original signal.
In this way, the receiver still receives the correct signal from the interceptor even though it's a forged signal. Since it's a classical signal rather than a quantum one, quantum rules no longer apply and the sender and receiver aren't made aware of the signal tampering.
The makers of the two quantum cryptographic schemes, Switzerland-based ID Quantique and Boston's MagiQ Technologies, likely weren't thrilled to find a hole in their systems but welcomed the news as it will help them to shore up weaknesses in their encryption schemes.

If quantum cryptography really gets your photons entangled, a PDF of the Nature Photonics paper published by the quantum hackers is available, or you can check out the hackers' "how we did it" site.


Source

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:37 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Hold on doesn't blinding the detectors momentarily count as leaving a trace?

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Aug 31, 2010 1:10 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
Hold on doesn't blinding the detectors momentarily count as leaving a trace?

Their technique only works because of what sounds like a terribly lazy flaw in the detector design; i.e. they can't tell the difference between a single photon true quantum signal and a huge blinding laser beam.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Tue Aug 31, 2010 1:17 pm
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
JJW009 wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
Hold on doesn't blinding the detectors momentarily count as leaving a trace?

Their technique only works because of what sounds like a terribly lazy flaw in the detector design; i.e. they can't tell the difference between a single photon true quantum signal and a huge blinding laser beam.

One that should be easy to fix.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:25 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
Name Fail - they should be "Quantum Crackers".

They weren't hacking the encryption; they were cracking it.

:roll:

_________________
Jim

Image


Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:30 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:06 pm
Posts: 6355
Location: IoW
Reply with quote
I thought Qubits could only exist in one of two states?

If so, then by interfering you change it's state. So what about interfering again, before the signal rerached it's intended destination, wouldn't that change each bit back to it's original state?

_________________
Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes; after that, who cares?! He's a mile away and you've got his shoes!


Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:25 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 6 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.