x404.co.uk
http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/

Blair and other ex-PMs 'must help fund protection'
http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=10424
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Amnesia10 [ Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Blair and other ex-PMs 'must help fund protection'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11216248

Quote:
Tony Blair and other former prime ministers should pay towards their police protection, a Labour MP says.

Roger Godsiff has tabled a Commons motion calling for an "urgent review" of security funding for ex-PMs who make money from "commercial activities".

Mr Blair is estimated to be worth £20m, with his protection said to cost up to £6m a year.

He cancelled a book signing in London this week, amid planned anti-Iraq war protests.

Without naming Mr Blair specifically, Mr Godsiff's motion says "former politicians should pay towards the cost of their own police protection when they receive income from commercial activities when they are accompanied by bodyguards paid for by the UK taxpayer".

Good.

Author:  l3v1ck [ Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blair and other ex-PMs 'must help fund protection'

Why should we may for him to make millions.
He can pay for his own book signing security.

Author:  Nick [ Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Blair and other ex-PMs 'must help fund protection'

I think it's right that a basic level of security is offered - but I agree that that shouldn't extend to commercial stuff.

Charity appearances would be a bit of a grey area, and seeing as he is donating the profits from the book to charity the book signing would have been a tough one.

Author:  Linux_User [ Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blair and other ex-PMs 'must help fund protection'

Nick wrote:
I think it's right that a basic level of security is offered - but I agree that that shouldn't extend to commercial stuff.

Charity appearances would be a bit of a grey area, and seeing as he is donating the profits from the book to charity the book signing would have been a tough one.


You could also argue that those soldiers wouldn't have got injured if it were not for Blair...

Author:  Nick [ Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Blair and other ex-PMs 'must help fund protection'

Linux_User wrote:
Nick wrote:
I think it's right that a basic level of security is offered - but I agree that that shouldn't extend to commercial stuff.

Charity appearances would be a bit of a grey area, and seeing as he is donating the profits from the book to charity the book signing would have been a tough one.


You could also argue that those soldiers wouldn't have got injured if it were not for Blair...


What are you talking about? Soldiers? Are you talking about Iraq?What does that have to do with security for ex prime-ministers?
:confused:

Author:  Linux_User [ Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blair and other ex-PMs 'must help fund protection'

Nick wrote:
Linux_User wrote:
Nick wrote:
I think it's right that a basic level of security is offered - but I agree that that shouldn't extend to commercial stuff.

Charity appearances would be a bit of a grey area, and seeing as he is donating the profits from the book to charity the book signing would have been a tough one.


You could also argue that those soldiers wouldn't have got injured if it were not for Blair...


What are you talking about? Soldiers? Are you talking about Iraq?What does that have to do with security for ex prime-ministers?
:confused:


The profits from his book are going to the Royal British Legion, to rehabilitate the very soldiers who are only injured because of Blair.

Author:  Nick [ Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Blair and other ex-PMs 'must help fund protection'

So he shouldn't get security then? :confused:

Author:  Amnesia10 [ Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blair and other ex-PMs 'must help fund protection'

I have no problems about paying for it while here, but if they want to go abroad then we should not have to pay millions for coppers to fly first class around the world so he can make money. Also if there were a cap on the sums involved then it might make PMs more circumspect about the decisions that they make.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/