Yes, because blowing up people who don’t agree with you is Such A Good Idea. Bloody idiot.

http://www.independent.co.uk/environmen ... 96801.html

As I said in the other thread, I think it's pretty much the only option when negotiation fails. It's called "war" and it's the last resort.

These people would destroy the planet. There is no greater principle to fight for. If they won't listen, they must die before they kill us all.

As you are probably aware, I am not convinced. I find the whole “Climate Change” circus to be as corrupt and devious as the Catholic Church. You would have me killed for what is merely ideology?

It's not just climate change, which is indeed something of a church. I believe the analogy is deliberate. Climate change is the "Hell" of the new religion, invented to make stupid little children behave themselves. The truth is, people should behave themselves for the sake of their fellow people without being threatened by a "devil".

99% of all the fossil resources mankind has used and 99% of all toxic landfill have happened in the last few of generations. It should be obvious this isn't sustainable.

The usual excuse of the selfish capitalist pig is "I'll be dead before it matters" - which translates as "F*ck you, F*ck your children and F*ck the planet - I'm all right Jack."

If climate change is a religion that can convince some people to stop raping our children, then so be it. If they won't be converted, then yes - kill them. There's plenty of historical precedent.

Very Nazi-esque. Replace those who aren't convinced (about man made global warming) with Jews and you've got a advert Hitler himself could have used.

GODWIN!

The primary difference is that "the Jews" represented an imaginary scape-goat, not a real and present danger.

A better analogy might be the indigenous people of some tropical paradise defending themselves against invaders who would pillage their resources leading to the death of their children and the end of their civilisation.

Well that is America, and Australia screwed then. They are the worst polluters of all.

It's only a clear and present danger to the believers.

We're talking about scientific evidence so blindingly simple a slime mould should understand it. Hitler's "evidence" was comprised mostly of delusions.

Would you allow someone to kill your loved one because they're so ignorant they think firing a loaded gun in their face is fun?

Ignorance is no defence in law or in war.

I'm not necessarily an unbeliever, but I certainly find it far from simple to understand. I could be thicker than slime mould though!

überGodwined!

There is indeed the complexity of the data, but we must also remember that the data represents a very small subset of potential data that could provide amore accurate picture of influences on our climate. There have been serious attempts to block research into the causes of the sun on our climate, for example, with those most vocal blockers being those with a large vested interest in the “carbon footprint” economy. The picture is skewed at source, hyped by the media, distorted by the politicians. It is no wonder that people are getting cynical about it, especially when there were those emails which came to light, and the enquiry conveniently found little amiss. The fact that the Freedom of Information Action had to be used at all shows that there is something being hidden.

There is no impact from the sun, into overall global warming. As a consequence of decades of heavy pollution the earth is actually suffering from what is called the global dimming. Whereby around 5% of the suns energy is simply not getting through to the ground. That has a cooling effect and has been ignored, yet the earth is still warming. The biggest vested interests are the oil companies.

I'm no scientist, but that sounds like nonsense to me, given the incidences of skin cancer are rising - what's happening?
Either the suns energy in the form of UV light is finding it easier to get here or humanity has become more susceptible to it's affects.
Also, given that solar activity appears to be affecting radioactive decay via an unknown mechanism, I don't think anyone can rule out just what the role of sun is in affairs here on Earth.