Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Sky to rebrand Living as Sky Living 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Sky has confirmed that it will rebrand the recently acquired Living channel to Sky Living from next year, and move it up to channel 107 on its EPG.

Living, along with Bravo and Virgin 1, was recently snapped up by Sky from Virgin Media, giving the satellite giant yet more of the key non-digital terrestrial television channels.

Sky believes that Living sits perfectly alongside its two other key entertainment channels – Sky1 and the forthcoming Sky Atlantic, which will bring the best of HBO and other key US programmes.

To that end, the company has announced that Living will be rebranded from 2011, and, significantly, the channel will be given a 25 per cent hike in its programme budget.

Build on success

"Living, the home of programmes such as Britain's Next Top Model, Four Weddings, Chuck and upcoming UK drama series Bedlam, was acquired by Sky from Virgin Media earlier this year," said Sky's release.

"To build on the channel's success as one of the UK's leading pay TV channels, it will re-brand as Sky Living from early 2011 and benefit from a 25% increase in on-screen investment.

"It will move to a new slot of #107 on the Sky EPG from its current position at #112."

Strong line-up

Sky Atlantic is set to launch 'from early 2011' and the triumvirate of channels will give Sky a stronger entertainment line-up than ever before.

"In Sky 1, Sky Living and Sky Atlantic we have three outstanding channels which will sit loud and proud at the top of the EPG, said Sky's MD of entertinament, news and broadcast operations Sophie Lain/

"Investment in stand-out content is at the heart of our strategy and we're delighted to be able to offer customers so much choice and quality across our expanded entertainment line-up. Taken together, these channels will have real cut through.

"Quite simply, they will be channels worth paying for and will give even more customers reasons to choose pay TV."

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:20 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
"Quite simply, they will be channels worth paying for and will give even more customers reasons to choose pay TV."


Oh, really? There is very little on Sky 1 that I watch, and I never watch Living as it is.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Mon Oct 25, 2010 1:07 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
pcernie wrote:
"Quite simply, they will be channels worth paying for and will give even more customers reasons to choose pay TV."


Oh, really? There is very little on Sky 1 that I watch, and I never watch Living as it is.

Chuck is on Living IIRC. Yvonne Strahovski FTW.


Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:45 pm
Profile
Official forum cat lady
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:04 am
Posts: 11039
Location: London
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
paulzolo wrote:
pcernie wrote:
"Quite simply, they will be channels worth paying for and will give even more customers reasons to choose pay TV."


Oh, really? There is very little on Sky 1 that I watch, and I never watch Living as it is.

Chuck is on Living IIRC. Yvonne Strahovski FTW.


It's a girl's channel that's why you don't watch it.

If Virgin no longer have these channels does that leave them with zero now?

_________________
Still the official cheeky one ;)

jonbwfc wrote:
Caz is correct though


Mon Oct 25, 2010 3:24 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
paulzolo wrote:
pcernie wrote:
"Quite simply, they will be channels worth paying for and will give even more customers reasons to choose pay TV."


Oh, really? There is very little on Sky 1 that I watch, and I never watch Living as it is.

Chuck is on Living IIRC. Yvonne Strahovski FTW.


Just looked her up - not 'alf! :D

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Mon Oct 25, 2010 4:18 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
pcernie wrote:
"Quite simply, they will be channels worth paying for and will give even more customers reasons to choose pay TV."


Oh, really? There is very little on Sky 1 that I watch, and I never watch Living as it is.

Chuck would have been the only thing I would have watched on Living. I do not watch the sky channels at all. Even on Freeview they are not that great. Sky 3 is rubbish and Sky News is nowhere as good as BBC News 24.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Oct 25, 2010 4:44 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
Sky 3 is rubbish and Sky News is nowhere as good as BBC News 24.

They're hardly likely to let anything decent go to the competition now though are they?


Mon Oct 25, 2010 6:27 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
Sky 3 is rubbish and Sky News is nowhere as good as BBC News 24.

They're hardly likely to let anything decent go to the competition now though are they?

Yes but it is an indication of the quality of the rest of the programming. I have NTL with the Freeview package on the main TV. It suits me. I have a limited terrestrial Freeview on the bedroom TV but really do not need the pay TV deals. I am considering Freesat HD but really need a very good reason to spend any more money on it. Friends and family have varying NTL pay packages and all moan about the lack of new content or repeats. Even suggesting rent the package you want for just a month and then go back to the free package for around 4 months and by then the content might have changed.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:14 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
pcernie wrote:
"Quite simply, they will be channels worth paying for and will give even more customers reasons to choose pay TV."


Oh, really? There is very little on Sky 1 that I watch, and I never watch Living as it is.
+1

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Tue Oct 26, 2010 7:30 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 9 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.