x404.co.uk http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/ |
|
Dixons wishes for a 3D Christmas http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=11622 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | pcernie [ Fri Nov 26, 2010 1:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Dixons wishes for a 3D Christmas |
http://www.techradar.com/news/televisio ... mas-910968 I'm predicting FAIL ![]() |
Author: | adidan [ Fri Nov 26, 2010 3:33 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Dixons wishes for a 3D Christmas | |||||||||
FAIL with knobs on. |
Author: | Tsar [ Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:08 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Dixons wishes for a 3D Christmas | ||||||||||||||||||
+ 1 |
Author: | rustybucket [ Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Dixons wishes for a 3D Christmas |
FAIL with 6 ensuite bedrooms, a Neo-Georgian frontage, ample parking, easy access to the M4 and excellent views of the Wye Valley. |
Author: | veato [ Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Dixons wishes for a 3D Christmas |
My dad was thinking about a new TV and BD player. There's a deal for a Panasonic plasma, BD player, free 3D BD movies and free 3D glasses. On that basis the package for him was probably worth it given it's around his budget for TV and player anyway. It's not for me though. I'm not buying into the tech. I went to a friends who put Alice in Wonderland on (Sony Bravia) and it didnt look right. The image still looked flat but stacked on planes behind each other if that makes sense. |
Author: | pcernie [ Sat Nov 27, 2010 3:19 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Dixons wishes for a 3D Christmas | |||||||||
![]() ![]() |
Author: | paulzolo [ Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:08 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Dixons wishes for a 3D Christmas | |||||||||
Hardly surprising - Alice was a 3D conversion from 2D which was rushed through. It was heavily criticised for its poor 3D, just like Clash of the TItans was. Stereoscopic images (this is what this current wave of 3D is) can make things look like stacked flat planes - it’s the nature of the beast. If done well, things can look good, but you have to be planning to make a 3D film from the start, and be using decent 3D cameras. |
Author: | veato [ Mon Nov 29, 2010 3:00 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Dixons wishes for a 3D Christmas | ||||||||||||||||||
I wondered if that was the case. From what I've seen at the cinema Avatar and Toy Story (to a lesser extend but added a nice depth to the picture) have had the best 3D effects. I'd like to see those on a home setup to compare. |
Author: | Fogmeister [ Mon Nov 29, 2010 3:15 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Dixons wishes for a 3D Christmas | ||||||||||||||||||
Up was very good in 3D also. There were no particularly 3D-esque effects (i.e. things shooting out of the screen etc...) but it just added nicely to the feel of the movie. Also, by its very nature, CGI films can be "converted" to 3D very easily as they are just big 3D models where the same scene can be run over and over with cameras in different places or indeed 2 stereoscopic cameras to create a 3D stereogram image. |
Author: | Fogmeister [ Mon Nov 29, 2010 3:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Dixons wishes for a 3D Christmas |
Actually, it wouldn't surprise me if they went and did a few older films (Toy Story 1 and 2, Monsters Inc, Shrek, The Incredibles, etc...) as 3DD versions and released them again. They will still have the raw data archived somewhere so it shouldn't be too much effort to do (relatively). |
Author: | pcernie [ Mon Nov 29, 2010 3:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Dixons wishes for a 3D Christmas |
I was just thinking the last Trek film might have decent scenes for 3D-ification... |
Author: | paulzolo [ Mon Nov 29, 2010 3:48 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Dixons wishes for a 3D Christmas | |||||||||
They had to rebuild the Toy Story models from scratch for Toy Story 3 because the software had moved on so much that they could not open the old models. So unless they have legacy rendering farms kicking around, opening the files for the original movie could be a challenge. |
Author: | l3v1ck [ Tue Nov 30, 2010 7:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Dixons wishes for a 3D Christmas |
People just don't have that kind of money spare at the moment. I was in a shop yesterday looking for a 37" (ish) LED back lit TV with HD Freeview. I took one look at the prices and decided it could wait a few more years. I wasn't even looking at 3D ones. (Not that I'm even interested in 3D ones.) |
Author: | veato [ Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:39 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Dixons wishes for a 3D Christmas | ||||||||||||||||||
I've seen a 42" Sharp LED for £450. I think they use the "full array" LED backlighting method though which is scraping the bottom of the barrel.
|
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |