Register • FAQ • Search • Login

View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Aug 14, 2025 11:29 am


Board index » In the News

All times are UTC




Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 9 posts ] 
Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
172 doomed BBC websites saved by one geek, for $3.99 
Author Message
Amnesia10
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Post 172 doomed BBC websites saved by one geek, for $3.99
http://thenextweb.com/uk/2011/02/10/172 ... -for-3-99/

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21
Fri Feb 11, 2011 7:57 pm
Profile
timark_uk
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12144
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Post Re: 172 doomed BBC websites saved by one geek, for $3.99
Yeah, this is cool.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.
Fri Feb 11, 2011 8:02 pm
Profile WWW
Spreadie
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:06 pm
Posts: 6355
Location: IoW
Reply with quote
Post Re: 172 doomed BBC websites saved by one geek, for $3.99
Speedy torrent too, downloading at 1.5 megabytes per sec. 8-)

_________________
Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes; after that, who cares?! He's a mile away and you've got his shoes!
Fri Feb 11, 2011 9:26 pm
Profile
paulzolo
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
Post Re: 172 doomed BBC websites saved by one geek, for $3.99
How big is it?

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation
Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:34 pm
Profile
pcernie
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Post Re: 172 doomed BBC websites saved by one geek, for $3.99
Quote:
Arguing that the removing the hosting costs of these websites which were no longer being actively developed was no real saving to the taxpayer at all, the individual writes:

“The purpose of this project is to show how the entire 172 public facing websites that are earmarked for deletion have been copied, archived, distributed and republished online – independently – for the price of a cup of Starbucks coffee (around $3.99).

In other words the true cost saving of this horrendous exercise is nothing more than your morning’s grande skinny caramel latte.”

Taking a more political tone, the author continues:

A weaker BBC means a weaker free press and in turn a weaker British democracy and society at large.

The purpose of this project is to expose the ‘cost savings’ of this proposed exercise as nothing more than a charade to appease the detractors to a strong BBC and to curry favour with the current government. BBC’s current senior management has demonstrated a lack of leadership and a lack of courage in pushing back on these demands.


If he's right, it was quite a clever ruse :o

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/
Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:56 pm
Profile
Spreadie
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:06 pm
Posts: 6355
Location: IoW
Reply with quote
Post Re: 172 doomed BBC websites saved by one geek, for $3.99
paulzolo wrote:
How big is it?

1.88 gigs - took about 25 minutes.

Came flushing down the pipes at an average of 1.25 megs an sec. :o

_________________
Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes; after that, who cares?! He's a mile away and you've got his shoes!
Fri Feb 11, 2011 11:52 pm
Profile
AlunD
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am
Posts: 7011
Location: Wiltshire
Reply with quote
Post Re: 172 doomed BBC websites saved by one geek, for $3.99
Well if they are no longer being developed why not just add them here http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/webarchive/ :?

_________________
<input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />
Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:05 am
Profile WWW
paulzolo
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
Post Re: 172 doomed BBC websites saved by one geek, for $3.99
I’d say that this is more about placating Murdoch and his anti-BBC stance than cost cutting. The BBC websites is (wrongly, in my view) being trimmed to appears to be less competitive with his American Import Machine.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation
Sat Feb 12, 2011 9:13 pm
Profile
Amnesia10
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Post Re: 172 doomed BBC websites saved by one geek, for $3.99
pcernie wrote:
Quote:
Arguing that the removing the hosting costs of these websites which were no longer being actively developed was no real saving to the taxpayer at all, the individual writes:

“The purpose of this project is to show how the entire 172 public facing websites that are earmarked for deletion have been copied, archived, distributed and republished online – independently – for the price of a cup of Starbucks coffee (around $3.99).

In other words the true cost saving of this horrendous exercise is nothing more than your morning’s grande skinny caramel latte.”

Taking a more political tone, the author continues:

A weaker BBC means a weaker free press and in turn a weaker British democracy and society at large.

The purpose of this project is to expose the ‘cost savings’ of this proposed exercise as nothing more than a charade to appease the detractors to a strong BBC and to curry favour with the current government. BBC’s current senior management has demonstrated a lack of leadership and a lack of courage in pushing back on these demands.


If he's right, it was quite a clever ruse :o

Unless there is a commensurate cut in staffing then this will not save money. I suspect that the majority of BBC costs like most services is wages. If these people are working in numerous areas which seems sensible then the cutting of staff means a reduction of quality of any other departments. This would benefit all those media who criticise the BBC but it also leaves them no stronger to a even more dominant News International.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21
Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:10 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   Page 1 of 1
  [ 9 posts ] 

Board index » In the News

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.