x404.co.uk
http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/

Ice cream siezed
http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=12825		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  PaulKey [ Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:51 am ]
Post subject:  Ice cream siezed
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-12615353

Quote:
"The ice cream was churned with donations from London mother Victoria Hiley, and served with a rusk and an optional shot of Calpol or Bonjela. Each serving costs £14."

That made me laugh til I cried :lol: Someone has a wicked sense of humour !
Author:  adidan [ Wed Mar 02, 2011 8:21 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Ice cream siezed
Bitty.
Author:  bobbdobbs [ Wed Mar 02, 2011 9:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Ice cream siezed
"milky milky"

MWE FTMFW
Author:  l3v1ck [ Wed Mar 02, 2011 2:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ice cream siezed
This topic is being covered in the Randon S*!t thread

CLICKY
Author:  MrStevenRogers [ Wed Mar 02, 2011 6:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ice cream siezed
Quote:
Westminster Council officers removed the product to make sure it was "fit for human consumption".


breast milk fit for human consumption ? are they sure ...
Author:  bobbdobbs [ Thu Mar 03, 2011 9:20 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Ice cream siezed
MrStevenRogers wrote:
Quote:
Westminster Council officers removed the product to make sure it was "fit for human consumption".


breast milk fit for human consumption ? are they sure ...

It does sound preposterous that human breast milk is unfit for human consumption but this milk isnt straight from the source. :lol: :oops:
It has been stored then processed and then sold therefore must adhere to food laws (EN EC 483 IIRC)
Author:  adidan [ Thu Mar 03, 2011 9:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Ice cream siezed
bobbdobbs wrote:
It does sound preposterous that human breast milk is unfit for human consumption but this milk isnt straight from the source. :lol: :oops:
It has been stored then processed and then sold therefore must adhere to food laws (EN EC 483 IIRC)

Also it's where any injested toxins are found isn't it?
Author:  Fogmeister [ Thu Mar 03, 2011 9:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Ice cream siezed
OK, is no one going to mention the fact that "seize" is an exception to the "i before e" "rule"?!

It's been bugging me since I first saw this thread :D

P.S. I say "rule" but there are plenty of exceptions to this "rule" which is probably enough to say that it is no longer a rule.
Author:  HeatherKay [ Thu Mar 03, 2011 10:02 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Ice cream siezed
Fogmeister wrote:
P.S. I say "rule" but there are plenty of exceptions to this "rule" which is probably enough to say that it is no longer a rule.


Which, if I recall, was something QI covered a while ago.

Funny old mongrel language, English.
Author:  JJW009 [ Thu Mar 03, 2011 12:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ice cream siezed
bobbdobbs wrote:
MrStevenRogers wrote:
Quote:
Westminster Council officers removed the product to make sure it was "fit for human consumption".


breast milk fit for human consumption ? are they sure ...

It does sound preposterous that human breast milk is unfit for human consumption but this milk isnt straight from the source. :lol: :oops:
It has been stored then processed and then sold therefore must adhere to food laws (EN EC 483 IIRC)

I believe that milk, eggs, meat and any other food stuffs sold commercially must be from registered breeds. I think that even applies to vegetables.

I'm guessing this particular dairy queen isn't on the approved species list.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/