Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
PepsiCo announces all-plant-based plastic bottle 
Author Message
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
Quote:
PepsiCo announces all-plant-based plastic bottle
The bottle, a chemical clone of conventional plastic bottles, is made from such renewable materials as switch grass, pine bark and corn husks rather than petroleum.

It's an environmental as well as a marketing achievement: using 100% agricultural waste to make a top-quality plastic bottle that can then be placed back in the existing recycling system.

"It's closing the loop," said Allen Hershkowitz, a senior scientist with the Natural Resources Defense Council. "It's the beginning of the end for petroleum-based plastic bottles."

PepsiCo announced Tuesday that it had "cracked the code," inventing what it calls the world's first plastic bottle made entirely from plant-based, fully renewable resources.

Down to the molecular level, it's a clone of today's plastic bottles, made with the resin polyethylene terephthalate (PET). The biggest difference is that manufacturing this bottle requires the use of no petroleum. Instead it is made from such renewable materials as switch grass, pine bark and corn husks. In the future, the company expects to use other materials, such as orange peels, potato peels, oat hulls and other agricultural byproducts from its own food businesses, which include product lines under the brands Frito-Lay, Tropicana and Quaker.

PepsiCo's "green" bottle is an acceleration of an environmental arms race to help not only Mother Earth but also the corporate bottom line.

Coca-Cola Co. nearly two years ago introduced the "PlantBottle." It is made of 30% plant material, specifically sugar-cane waste. H.J. Heinz Co., the ketchup maker, said last month it too would use the renewable bottle from Coca-Cola. Coca-Cola did not return a call for comment.

But PepsiCo's bottle will be 100% made from plant waste.

"It could be a game changer for them," said Carol Phillips, a University of Notre Dame marketing professor and president of market research firm Brand Amplitude. "In the cola wars, every little bit means something. It's a game of perception. It can tip the balance, at least for a while."

The environmentally friendly bottle can be a marketing edge, depending on how Pepsi exploits it, Phillips said. That's especially true among so-called millennials or Generation Y, a primary target for soft-drink companies. "I think it's big for the millennials," she said. "Everybody would love a way to be green, especially if it doesn't cost them any more."

The new bottle will be as sturdy and clear as current bottles, being the chemical equal to the current PET plastic bottles, said Denise Lefebvre, senior director of advanced research at PepsiCo.

The breakthrough was finding the correct fermentation process using plant material, Lefebvre said. In making PET, the polyethylene makes up about 30% of the total by weight. That's the part already commercialized — the 30% renewable that Coca-Cola bottles already use. What PepsiCo discovered was how to make the second part of PET, the terephthalate, out of plant waste. That's the remaining 70%, she said.

"We've been the one to crack the code on that," Lefebvre said. Combining the technologies allows for a bottle made entirely from plants. "This space is emerging so much that we've been able to develop and piece together various technologies to make this."


http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-pepsi-20110315,0,882790.story

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Wed Mar 16, 2011 10:28 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Hmm, could that be patented or whatever?

Won't stop Pepsi being second best though ;)

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Wed Mar 16, 2011 10:42 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
Well that's good for when we run out of oil. But does it take any extra energy to make? Or is this really the golden challace of plastic?

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Wed Mar 16, 2011 10:48 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
But does it take any extra energy to make? Or is this really the golden challace of plastic?


This is what I wonder. Is it waste veg. product, or is this material that could otherwise be used for feeding people?
Is this another biofuel situation?
On the flip side, I'm all for packaging that biodegrades and doesn't end up floating about in the ocean forever, killing everything.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Wed Mar 16, 2011 10:51 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
Well that's good for when we run out of oil. But does it take any extra energy to make? Or is this really the golden challace of plastic?

Presumably they could power the plants from plants.

This isn't like biofuels with huge areas of land being used for cash-crops. The number of bottles used by Pepsi may be a lot, but the weight pales into insignificance compared the fuel burned in cars. They state that all the raw material is waste, hopefully soon from their own plants, and I imagine there's probably quite a lot that could simply be burned for power.

It's quite an achievement to create a cyclic compound on an industrial scale this way. I look forward to reading the patent and hearing what else might be produced.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Wed Mar 16, 2011 11:01 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
On the flip side, I'm all for packaging that biodegrades and doesn't end up floating about in the ocean forever, killing everything.
Didn't they say the end product is chemically identical to current plastics? That means it still will float in the oceans forever doesn't it?

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Wed Mar 16, 2011 11:14 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
Didn't they say the end product is chemically identical to current plastics? That means it still will float in the oceans forever doesn't it?


Actually, yes, I think you're right.
So keep on recycling...

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Wed Mar 16, 2011 11:16 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
Hmm, could that be patented or whatever?

Won't stop Pepsi being second best though ;)

The process could be. The end result resin polyethylene terephthalate (PET) would be already patented by someone or other though it could have expired. Even so it could be an even bigger publicity coup to give the technology away so it can become the standard bottle.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Mar 16, 2011 11:21 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
give the technology away so it can become the standard bottle.
Or license it so others can use it.
That way they can claim to be environmental saviors and make a quick buck at the same time.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Thu Mar 17, 2011 1:46 am
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
give the technology away so it can become the standard bottle.
Or license it so others can use it.
That way they can claim to be environmental saviors and make a quick buck at the same time.

It might actually slow the uptake of it. Though if they have a manufacturing plant making these then they could get the money back through dominating the supply of the bottles, giving reductions for supplying inputs. Economies of scale could be better than licensing, as the costs of production benefit PepsiCo as well.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Thu Mar 17, 2011 8:35 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 10 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.