Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
BT escapes prosecution over web snooping 
Author Message
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
Quote:
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has dropped a request bring charges against BT and Phorm - the firm that supplied the monitoring system.

The Webwise software used cookies to track people online and then tailored adverts to the sites they visited.


It did a lot more than just “use cookies” to track people.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Fri Apr 08, 2011 3:58 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
The CPS are still working on the 'Is the Pope really a Catholic?' case ffs...

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:06 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Ofcom are too closely linked to BT so will not be prosecuting them. Simple ineptitude and/or corruption. Take your pick.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:27 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
Oh great.[/sarcasm]
Now BT will think they can get away with this sort of thing.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:35 pm
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
Oh great.[/sarcasm]
Now BT will think they can get away with this sort of thing.

They knew beforehand that was why they did it.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Fri Apr 08, 2011 5:22 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:46 pm
Posts: 10022
Reply with quote
Do you have a link to the full news item?


The greatest problem is now other companies may try to get in on this.

_________________
Image
He fights for the users.


Fri Apr 08, 2011 5:30 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
Quote:
BT escapes prosecution over web snooping

BT will not be prosecuted for snooping on the web browsing habits of its customers.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has dropped a request bring charges against BT and Phorm - the firm that supplied the monitoring system.

The Webwise software used cookies to track people online and then tailored adverts to the sites they visited.

The CPS explained its decision saying that there was insufficient evidence to proceed with a prosecution.

The web tracking trials were carried out in 2006 and involved more than 16,000 BT customers. When the covert trials became public they led to calls for prosecution because BT and partner Phorm did not get the consent of customers beforehand.

This left them open to prosecution under Section 1 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act which outlaws unlawful interception.

The call to bring both firms to court was led by privacy campaigner Alexander Hanff who took his complaint to the CPS after the police declined to take up the case.

"At present, the available evidence is insufficient to provide a realistic prospect of conviction," said the CPS in a statement.

"We would only take such a decision if we were satisfied that the broad extent of the criminality had been determined and that we could make a fully informed assessment of the public interest," it said.

The CPS said that influences on its decision included the fact that the trials were short and unlikely to be repeated. Additionally, the data gathered was anonymised and later destroyed.

It added that there was no evidence to suggest that anyone who unwittingly took part in the trial suffered any harm or loss.

A spokesman for BT said it had no comment to make on the case.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-13015194

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Fri Apr 08, 2011 9:54 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 7 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.