Author |
Message |
pcernie
Legend
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm Posts: 45931 Location: Belfast
|
_________________Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:
http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/
|
Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:55 pm |
|
 |
l3v1ck
What's a life?
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am Posts: 12700 Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
|
How hid he got hold of a gun?
I know that sounds a bit like a supid question given that it's a military vessel, but surely all weapons are kept under lock and key. It's not like a surface vessel where they'll practice operations involving guns on a regular basis. And if it wasn't a navy owned gun, how did he get one on board?
|
Fri Apr 08, 2011 5:01 pm |
|
 |
brataccas
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:14 pm Posts: 5664 Location: Scotland
|
_________________
|
Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:19 pm |
|
 |
Amnesia10
Legend
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am Posts: 29240 Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
|
Bratty supplied it? 
_________________Do concentrate, 007... "You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds." https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTkhttp://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21
|
Fri Apr 08, 2011 8:16 pm |
|
 |
davrosG5
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am Posts: 6954 Location: Peebo
|
According to the news report I saw last night (channel 4) the gunman was part of the boats security detail and the incident occurred during a watch change over. He would therefore have had access to the weapon used. What I find alarming was that the weapon appears to have been a SA80 riffle, not a hand gun. I realise that security is probably beefed up when the boat is in port but it seems like a rather excessive weapon to be using to make sure unauthorised people don't get onto the sub. That all assumes of course that the C4 report was accurate at the time.
_________________ When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum. -Billy Connolly (to a heckler)
|
Sat Apr 09, 2011 8:38 am |
|
 |
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm Posts: 17040
|
It's a nuclear submarine. They don't take any chances with the security on those. There are also persistent stories that there are actually fully armed soldiers on site at every nuclear power station in the UK. Neither the UK government or BNFL will confirm or deny the fact but it's generally assumed. The guy I used to live next door to who worked for BNFL certainly seemed to think it was the case. I don't think it's that big a deal to have 'better than sidearm' weapons for security anyway. If you go to any UK international airport there are few policeman wandering around with G-36's or MP5's. Nobody wants to be the bloke who says 'they're not needed any more' just before a bunch of terrorists try to cause mayhem. Jon
|
Sat Apr 09, 2011 10:42 am |
|
 |
davrosG5
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am Posts: 6954 Location: Peebo
|
Having worked at a nuclear power station I didn't see any armed soldiers in the entire year I was there. Someone I went to uni with however has been to Sellafield and there are definitely soldiers there, mind you, it's a much bigger and more valuable installation than a single power station so it's not that surprising.
_________________ When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum. -Billy Connolly (to a heckler)
|
Sat Apr 09, 2011 5:28 pm |
|
 |
belchingmatt
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am Posts: 6146 Location: Middle Earth
|
I've heard a rumour that there was a quarrel over who got to use the toilet first. 
_________________ Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!
><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º> •.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.
|
Sat Apr 09, 2011 10:23 pm |
|
|