View unanswered posts | View active topics
It is currently Wed Jul 02, 2025 12:22 am
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 6 posts ] |
|
Martin Jetpack's 'jetski for the skies' to go on sale 2012
Author |
Message |
Amnesia10
Legend
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am Posts: 29240 Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
|
_________________Do concentrate, 007... "You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds." https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTkhttp://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21
|
Thu Jun 09, 2011 10:31 pm |
|
 |
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm Posts: 17040
|
I'd genuinely love one, but it doesn't have the range for my daily commute. 10 more miles or so and I'm there, dude. Jon
|
Thu Jun 09, 2011 10:43 pm |
|
 |
Amnesia10
Legend
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am Posts: 29240 Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
|
I think that the range is a minimal problem. In a couple of years it will be better than that. I suspect that the bigger problem will be will you need a pilots license? Or other restrictions on their use.
_________________Do concentrate, 007... "You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds." https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTkhttp://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21
|
Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:10 pm |
|
 |
JJW009
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm Posts: 8767 Location: behind the sofa
|
I think you're wrong. We've had working jet-packs for over 60 years, but the range has never significantly improved. It's simply a matter of physics. They're all powered by chemical fuels which have a fixed energy content, and people are not getting any lighter. You could have a nuclear one which went around the world on one fuel pack, but I doubt it would sell well for various reasons.
_________________jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly." When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net
|
Fri Jun 10, 2011 12:14 am |
|
 |
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm Posts: 17040
|

Um, I consider running out of fuel in midair to be a more than minimal problem Agreed but there are a couple of points in it's favour. Firstly they aren't rockets they're ducted fans, so they're essentially internal combustion engines. And we are quite good at improving the efficiency of those and there's going to be a lot of money pumped into such research in the near future. Secondly, they can also improve the aerodynamic efficiency of the fans to give more lift with lower power, thus reducing fuel usage rate. So I think there is some leeway to increase the range. You're not ever going to get 1000 miles of range in a tank, but you might get to 100 rather than 30. And it's less hassle to 'recharge' than an electricly powered vehicle as it stands. No hydrocarbon engine we currently have gets anywhere near 100% efficient, even in combustion terms, so there's room to improve. Course as a hydrocarbon powered vehicle it's dead as the dodo in the long term. Hopefully by then we might have figured out how to make batteries good enough to power it that don't weigh half a ton. Jon
|
Fri Jun 10, 2011 8:59 am |
|
 |
Amnesia10
Legend
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am Posts: 29240 Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
|
But did you notice the parachute for just such a problem?  I think that they will be able to get the range up a few more miles at least especially when the big money gets interested. I agree anywhere from 30 miles to 100 miles will be good enough for most people.
_________________Do concentrate, 007... "You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds." https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTkhttp://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21
|
Fri Jun 10, 2011 9:42 am |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 6 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|