x404.co.uk http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/ |
|
Google offers to rewrite web to make it faster http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=14329 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | pcernie [ Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Google offers to rewrite web to make it faster |
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/enterprise/ ... -it-faster Argos and Play please take note you feckin' retards ![]() |
Author: | Amnesia10 [ Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:25 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Google offers to rewrite web to make it faster | |||||||||
Also to make it easier to collect data on users? ![]() |
Author: | pcernie [ Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:31 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Google offers to rewrite web to make it faster | ||||||||||||||||||
Of course, but those two could actually cost Google money, 'We just can't figure out what sort of backward-ass systems they're using'... |
Author: | Amnesia10 [ Sat Jul 30, 2011 7:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Google offers to rewrite web to make it faster |
In some respects a faster more secure internet would be a good thing. Though it would need to be opened up to stop abuse by Google who could use such information to maintain its dominance. |
Author: | finlay666 [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 12:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Google offers to rewrite web to make it faster |
On 3 sites we have recently finished at work, 2 I worked as sole dev on and one I didn't have any hands on development time.... Site with no involvement on (mainly static work, not much in the way of images) Page Load Time 6.079s 4.090s -1.989s (32.7%) Repeat View Page Load Time 3.354s 2.276s -1.078s (32.1%) Site 1 I worked on, Asp.net webforms, image heavy for a design company with no compression on the images (text could possibly have been compressed...) Page Load Time 5.287s 5.067s -0.220s (4.2%) Repeat View Page Load Time 4.159s 3.128s -1.031s (24.8%) Site 2 I worked on, Asp.net MVC3, still on the demo server, no caching or any other performance enhancements until other niggles are worked out Page Load Time 2.498s 1.967s -0.531s (21.3%) Repeat View Page Load Time 2.104s 1.075s -1.029s (48.9%) From looking at the performance of what has actually been done... all they have done is compress the images, gzip text and cache a lot more of the non dynamic data (which on a lot of our sites is very few and far between, could set up a better cache dependency though) |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |