Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Boris is at it again 
Author Message
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-15546956#

Boris just won't keep his floppy hair inside the M25. Having been rebuffed with his plans for Boris Island out in the middle of the Thames Estuary, he now wants to build one slap bang in the middle of the only bit of decent wilderness left in North Kent.

BoJo! Sling yer 'ook! Hands off our marshes!

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Wed Nov 02, 2011 1:30 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5837
Reply with quote
Here's an idea.

How London getting no more transport improvements for the next 30 years and instead we focus on the 88% of the UK population that don't live there.

:evil:

_________________
Jim

Image


Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:00 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
Okay, I accept that London needs more runway capacity for teh coming decades. What's wrong with extra runways at Gatwick, Stanstead or Heathrow? Surely that would be much cheaper.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:04 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
Okay, I accept that London needs more runway capacity for teh coming decades. What's wrong with extra runways at Gatwick, Stanstead or Heathrow? Surely that would be much cheaper.


I disagree with that. I'm sure there are a lot of people who would rather travel long-haul flights from Bristol, Cardiff and Birmingham, rather than have to travel across the country to Heathrow and Gatwick, or further north to Manchester. Force the airlines to service the country.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:39 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
What he said. Concentrating our long haul links in London just means everybody else has to schlep there to get a plane. It's ludicrous.

Jon


Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:50 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
London does not need more people arriving into it.
Yet Plymouth airport's shut down (you can jump on a bus to Newquay instead and fly from there. Only adds about 1.5hrs to your journey time) and I suspect the rest of the smaller guys are feeling the squeeze a bit too.

rustybucket wrote:
Here's an idea.

How London getting no more transport improvements for the next 30 years and instead we focus on the 88% of the UK population that don't live there.

:evil:


Yeah that would be nice, wouldn't it?

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:11 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
I suspect the extra capacity is mostly needed for incoming traffic. Who's going to tell Jonny Foreigner that instead of flying directly to London - the place he wants to visit - he has to go via Manchester instead?

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:19 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Linux_User wrote:
I suspect the extra capacity is mostly needed for incoming traffic. Who's going to tell Jonny Foreigner that instead of flying directly to London - the place he wants to visit - he has to go via Manchester instead?

Yes, because everyone coming to Britain actually wants to come to London :roll:


Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:21 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
Linux_User wrote:
I suspect the extra capacity is mostly needed for incoming traffic. Who's going to tell Jonny Foreigner that instead of flying directly to London - the place he wants to visit - he has to go via Manchester instead?

Yes, because everyone coming to Britain actually wants to come to London :roll:

Most do. London is easily the UK's number 1 tourist destination. I don't see many other cities struggling for airport capacity...

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:26 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Linux_User wrote:
Most do. London is easily the UK's number 1 tourist destination.

Can you cite a reference for that?

Quote:
I don't see many other cities struggling for airport capacity...

Just because you haven't seen it doesn't mean it isn't there. Apart from the obvious point that if you concentrate all the flights in London, that's the only place that will have capacity problems almost by definition. If there are other airports that have spare capacity, it makes more sense to move flights to them, rather than build a whole new airport at vast expense in London. And if the other airports don't have spare capacity, it will probably also cost less to expand them than it would to build another airport in London. Building another airport in London is actually the option that makes least sense in pretty much all cases.

Unless you assume London is the centre of the sodding universe.

Jon


Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:49 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
Linux_User wrote:
Most do. London is easily the UK's number 1 tourist destination.

Can you cite a reference for that?

No, I believe it comes under 'stating the bleeding obvious'. As for London being the "centre of the sodding universe", I have no love for the place, but there's no denying that it's the de facto cultural & economic capital of the UK by a country mile.There isn't another British city that even comes close. It is, of course, also the seat of government & capital city for the United Kingdom. London dominates the entire country in almost every conceivable way - legally, politically, culturally, financially etc etc ad infinitum.

For all these reasons & more it is quite obviously the number 1 tourist destination for both domestic & foreign visitors. To claim otherwise is rather like suggesting more British people visit Nice than Paris or Detroit than New York etc.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Thu Nov 03, 2011 12:37 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Linux_User wrote:
For all these reasons & more it is quite obviously the number 1 tourist destination for both domestic & foreign visitors. To claim otherwise is rather like suggesting more British people visit Nice than Paris or Detroit than New York etc.


Clearly not all passengers are tourists in the sense that you make out. I've been to Denmark four times but I haven't been to Copenhagen once. I have customers in the shop travelling to Asia from London, and they've driven down from Aberdeen. Several years ago I flew from Heathrow to Newcastle for a business trip, but started in Southampton, which has it's own capable airport. There are many passengers who go to the big cities because that is where the flights are, not because they need or want to be there.

Landing cards should be ammended with a preferred arrival airport option.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:11 am
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
The point is this proposed blot on the estuary is not meant purely as an arrivals airport.

Heathrow is a hub airport: people fly in from all over the planet, change planes and fly out. The plan is for a much larger airport to the east of London where planes fly in, disgorge their cargo into other planes, which then fly out again. The short-sighted concrete fiddlers seem to think this is important, but how it generates income for the country I don't get.

To my mind, we should let the larger European airports deal with that kind of stuff. We've got plenty of transport links to the continent, after all.

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:18 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
It would appear that Southend airport has applied for the London prefix to it's name. :lol: :? :roll:

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:53 am
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
It would appear that Southend airport has applied for the London prefix to it's name. :lol: :? :roll:


Manston already uses it, I believe.

London Manston. :roll:

I accept you can almost see some of the taller bits of London in the mist up the Channel, but to claim any link with London when France is closer is just a joke.

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:14 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 24 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.