Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Self-guided bullet prototype can hit target a mile away 
Author Message
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
Quote:
Self-guided bullet prototype can hit target a mile away
January 30, 2012

Take two Sandia National Laboratories engineers who are hunters, get them talking about the sport and it shouldn’t be surprising when the conversation leads to a patented design for a self-guided bullet that could help war fighters. (Click here for a video showing the prototype’s flight.)

Sandia researchers Red Jones and Brian Kast and their colleagues have invented a dart-like, self-guided bullet for small-caliber, smooth-bore firearms that could hit laser-designated targets at distances of more than a mile (about 2,000 meters).

“We have a very promising technology to guide small projectiles that could be fully developed inexpensively and rapidly,” Jones said.

Sandia is seeking a private company partner to complete testing of the prototype and bring a guided bullet to the marketplace.

Researchers have had initial success testing the design in computer simulations and in field tests of prototypes, built from commercially available parts, Jones said.

While engineering issues remain, “we’re confident in our science base and we’re confident the engineering-technology base is there to solve the problems,” he said.

Sandia’s design for the four-inch-long bullet includes an optical sensor in the nose to detect a laser beam on a target. The sensor sends information to guidance and control electronics that use an algorithm in an eight-bit central processing unit to command electromagnetic actuators. These actuators steer tiny fins that guide the bullet to the target.

Most bullets shot from rifles, which have grooves, or rifling, that cause them to spin so they fly straight, like a long football pass. To enable a bullet to turn in flight toward a target and to simplify the design, the spin had to go, Jones said.

The bullet flies straight due to its aerodynamically stable design, which consists of a center of gravity that sits forward in the projectile and tiny fins that enable it to fly without spin, just as a dart does, he said.

Computer aerodynamic modeling shows the design would result in dramatic improvements in accuracy, Jones said. Computer simulations showed an unguided bullet under real-world conditions could miss a target more than a half mile away (1,000 meters away) by 9.8 yards (9 meters), but a guided bullet would get within 8 inches (0.2 meters), according to the patent.

Plastic sabots provide a gas seal in the cartridge and protect the delicate fins until they drop off after the bullet emerges from the firearm’s barrel.

The prototype does not require a device found in guided missiles called an inertial measuring unit, which would have added substantially to its cost. Instead, the researchers found that the bullet’s relatively small size when compared to guided missiles “is helping us all around. It’s kind of a fortuitous thing that none of us saw when we started,” Jones said.

As the bullet flies through the air, it pitches and yaws at a set rate based on its mass and size. In larger guided missiles, the rate of flight-path corrections is relatively slow, so each correction needs to be very precise because fewer corrections are possible during flight. But “the natural body frequency of this bullet is about 30 hertz, so we can make corrections 30 times per second. That means we can overcorrect, so we don’t have to be as precise each time,” Jones said.

Testing has shown the electromagnetic actuator performs well and the bullet can reach speeds of 2,400 feet per second, or Mach 2.1, using commercially available gunpowder. The researchers are confident it could reach standard military speeds using customized gunpowder.

And a nighttime field test, in which a tiny light-emitting diode, or LED, was attached to the bullet showed the battery and electronics can survive flight, Jones said.

Researchers also filmed high-speed video of the bullet radically pitching as it exited the barrel. The bullet pitches less as it flies down range, a phenomenon known to long-range firearms experts as “going to sleep.” Because the bullet’s motions settle the longer it is in flight, accuracy improves at longer ranges, Jones said.

“Nobody had ever seen that, but we’ve got high-speed video photography that shows that it’s true,” he said.

Potential customers for the bullet include the military, law enforcement and recreational shooters.

In addition to Jones and Kast, Sandia researchers who helped develop the technology are: engineer Brandon R. Rohrer, aerodynamics expert Marc W. Kniskern, mechanical designer Scott E. Rose, firearms expert James W. Woods and Ronald W. Greene, a guidance, control and simulation engineer.



http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-01-self-guided-bullet-prototype-mile.html

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:12 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Image


Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:16 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am
Posts: 6954
Location: Peebo
Reply with quote
Isn't that the idea of the weapons used by the High Guard in Andromeda? I'm sure their projectiles could go round corners and home in on targets.

_________________
When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum.
-Billy Connolly (to a heckler)


Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:57 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
davrosG5 wrote:
Isn't that the idea of the weapons used by the High Guard in Andromeda? I'm sure their projectiles could go round corners and home in on targets.

I'm sure it's not a new idea by any means. I'd imagine pretty soon after the first guided rockets (i.e. missiles)someone was thinking 'wow, what if we could get a gun that fired tiny rockets like that instead of bullets?' After all you could describe these things as 'micro missiles' just as much as 'smart bullets'. Especially given the article suggests they have inbuilt propulsion - a bullet doesn't generally have that.

Jon


Wed Feb 01, 2012 4:12 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:10 pm
Posts: 1057
Reply with quote
Terrorists will love this idea :roll:

_________________
Image


Wed Feb 01, 2012 4:35 pm
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:12 pm
Posts: 2020
Location: Mute City
Reply with quote
one step closer to this :D

on a serious note, weren't they already doing this sort of thing with tank shells? i suppose being able to fit that system into a smaller space is pretty impressive though.


Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:09 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
soddit112 wrote:
one step closer to this :D
on a serious note, weren't they already doing this sort of thing with tank shells?

The Americans had one for a while, the Shillelagh missile system. Wasn't very successful. These days it's much more about making a 'dumb' projectile travel as fast as possible to the target. You can make the tank shells pretty much a big lump of metal (and therefore quite cheap) and as long as they travel fast enough you don't really need to worry about guidance because the target won't have moved very far in the travel time of the round. Also, tank shells are heavy enough not to be deflected by anything while en route so as long as it's on target when you start, you'll probably hit it. Basically what they used to call HVAP, but really, really fast. That's basically what an APFSDS round is...

soddit112 wrote:
i suppose being able to fit that system into a smaller space is pretty impressive though.

Plus having electronics able to survive the journey. The G forces applied to a bullet are a bit extreme.


Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:38 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
So if they develop a heavy duty sniper riffle version, how far will that go?

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:41 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5837
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
So if they develop a heavy duty sniper riffle version, how far will that go?

About the width of a small river I should think.

;)

_________________
Jim

Image


Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:11 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
According to wikipedia, the longest recorded lethal shot with a 'dumb' bullet is just under two miles...

Quote:
The longest range recorded for a sniper kill currently stands at 2,475 m (2,707 yd) and was achieved by CoH Craig Harrison, a sniper from the Household Cavalry of the British Army. It was accomplished in an engagement in November 2009 in which two stationary Taliban machine gunners were killed south of Musa Qala in Helmand Province in Afghanistan with two consecutive shots by CoH Harrison using an Accuracy International L115A3 Long Range Rifle chambered in .338 Lapua Magnum.


Although I have to say I'm more impressed by this...

Quote:
In another notable incident on April 3, 2003, Corporals Matt and Sam Hughes, a two-man sniper team of the Royal Marines, armed with L96 sniper rifles each killed people at a range of about 860 metres (941 yd) with shots that, due to strong wind, had to be fired "exactly 17 meters (56 ft) to the left of the target for the bullet to bend in the wind."


17 meters! It's like firing a bullet round a sodding corner.

I read an interview with Corporal Harrison, who did say that it was pretty much ideal conditions - high up so thin atmosphere to reduce atmospheric drag on the round, no wind, clear day, Taliban soldiers dumb enough to sit still in the open - but it's still.,, well, a hell of a long way.

Given a smart bullet is heavier it's not going to have the same effective range which might offset the accuracy somewhat. I suspect the point is to improve the percentage chance of killing your target at standard engagement ranges (which are usually less than one mile) rather than allowing kills at longer ranges.

Jon


Thu Feb 02, 2012 11:20 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
17 meters! It's like firing a bullet round a sodding corner.

Pah, Angelina Joliee and James McAvoy can do that without special bullets ;)

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:43 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 11 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.