Author |
Message |
pcernie
Legend
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm Posts: 45931 Location: Belfast
|
_________________Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:
http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/
|
Mon Mar 19, 2012 4:10 pm |
|
 |
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm Posts: 17040
|
Crazy thing - Apple's market cap is something like $110bn, right? That, essentially, is how much the stock market believes Apple as a company is worth. Yet Apple has something like $100bn in the bank. In cash, effectively. So essentially according to the stock market everything else - all the patents, all the research, all the 'brand loyalty', all the shops, all the staff, everything else, is worth less than $10b. Which, in stock market terms for a multinational company, is peanuts. And they made $6bn in profit in the last three months of last year alone.
Regardless of all of those numbers being completely ludicrous, it suggests to me that if anything Apple is undervalued on the stock market. Unless they do something utterly [LIFTED] insane (or someone else does something which is genuinely a piece of genius) they're going to still end up with more money than they know what to do with.
Jon
|
Mon Mar 19, 2012 4:24 pm |
|
 |
bobbdobbs
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm Posts: 5490 Location: just behind you!
|

 |  |  |  | jonbwfc wrote: Crazy thing - Apple's market cap is something like $110bn, right? That, essentially, is how much the stock market believes Apple as a company is worth. Yet Apple has something like $100bn in the bank. In cash, effectively. So essentially according to the stock market everything else - all the patents, all the research, all the 'brand loyalty', all the shops, all the staff, everything else, is worth less than $10b. Which, in stock market terms for a multinational company, is peanuts. And they made $6bn in profit in the last three months of last year alone.
Regardless of all of those numbers being completely ludicrous, it suggests to me that if anything Apple is undervalued on the stock market. Unless they do something utterly [LIFTED] insane (or someone else does something which is genuinely a piece of genius) they're going to still end up with more money than they know what to do with.
Jon |  |  |  |  |
er the last i looked Apples market cap was $559 billion. With Apple now paying dividends is this the board coming out of the Jobs era?
_________________Finally joined Flickr
|
Mon Mar 19, 2012 4:55 pm |
|
 |
belchingmatt
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am Posts: 6146 Location: Middle Earth
|
Steve will be iTurning in his grave.
_________________ Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!
><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º> •.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.
|
Mon Mar 19, 2012 5:08 pm |
|
 |
l3v1ck
What's a life?
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am Posts: 12700 Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
|
About time. I always thought it wrong that the held all that money and didn't give any of it to the people that own the company.
|
Tue Mar 20, 2012 12:24 am |
|
 |
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm Posts: 17040
|
Their attitude always previously was that the shareholder benefit was in the increasing value of their investment, which is pretty significant. Guy on the radio this morning said that if you'd taken the $300 the iPod cost on the day it launched and spent that on Apple shares instead, those shares would now be worth over $24,000. $11 a year in dividends doesn't get anywhere near that profit.
Jon
|
Tue Mar 20, 2012 7:55 am |
|
 |
big_D
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm Posts: 10691 Location: Bramsche
|
Doesn't help though if you are investing for income...  My grandparents invested for dividends, the daily share price was pretty much irrelevant, they wanted to live off of the income from the shares - which they did very successfully for about 20 years.
_________________ "Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari
Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246
|
Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:25 am |
|
 |
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm Posts: 17040
|
So? Apple as a matter of corporate policy up until this week did not pay dividends. Why, if you're investing to get dividends, would you buy shares in a company with a long standing corporate policy of not paying dividends? As far as I'm aware it isn't compulsory to buy Apple shares. Other shares are also available. I find it rather... bizarre. Up until quite recently, Apple just didn't pay dividends. Haven't for 17 years. Seventeen years. Yet people bought Apple shares knowing they haven't paid any dividends for years and years and then complained because they didn't pay dividends! wtf? Jon
|
Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:42 am |
|
 |
koli
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:12 pm Posts: 1171
|
The bottom line is that receiving a dividend regularly or company keeping the cash (and this being reflected in higher share price) doesn't have any effect on your net worth (other things being equal).
However common sense would suggest that getting a dividend in this specific case is better simply because Apple holding cash in the bank investors can replicate easily (by putting money/dividend in the bank themselves). However investor might have different invest. opportunities (e.g. buying shares in other companies, repaying a mortgage, investing in a different currency assets) which might bring him a better return (than holding cash which is what apple is doing with investors' money).
|
Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:50 am |
|
 |
koli
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:12 pm Posts: 1171
|
I am going to be very frank: you haven't got a clue what you're talking about. In this thread you are out of your depht so no wonder you are finding things bizzare...
|
Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:54 am |
|
 |
HeatherKay
Moderator
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm Posts: 7262 Location: Here, but not all there.
|
I'll be frank. I wish I'd invested in some Apple shares when they were in double figures.
_________________My Flickr | Snaptophobic BloggageHeather Kay: modelling details that matter. "Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.
|
Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:10 pm |
|
 |
tombolt
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:38 am Posts: 2967 Location: Dorchester, Dorset
|
Or even when they went into triple figures, but I didn't think they'd go much higher!
|
Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:13 pm |
|
 |
ProfessorF
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm Posts: 12030
|
I frequently regret spending my student loan on food and shelter. I seriously thought about it at the time, ploughing the loan into Apple shares. It was the time of Apple flirting with Jean Louis Gassée and Michael Dell's infamous pronunciation.  If I'd been cold and hungry then, I'd be a great deal richer now.
|
Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:14 pm |
|
 |
big_D
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm Posts: 10691 Location: Bramsche
|

 |  |  |  | jonbwfc wrote: So? Apple as a matter of corporate policy up until this week did not pay dividends. Why, if you're investing to get dividends, would you buy shares in a company with a long standing corporate policy of not paying dividends? As far as I'm aware it isn't compulsory to buy Apple shares. Other shares are also available. I find it rather... bizarre. Up until quite recently, Apple just didn't pay dividends. Haven't for 17 years. Seventeen years. Yet people bought Apple shares knowing they haven't paid any dividends for years and years and then complained because they didn't pay dividends! wtf? Jon |  |  |  |  |
I was just pointing out, not everybody buys shares for the resale value of the shares, they buy for the income those shares can generate over time. If I have Apple shares, I need to sell a couple of hundred every year, in order to have an income. With most other shares, I get from a few pence to a few quid per share per year income. For many people, that is more important. I'm not saying Apple's way is good or bad, just not what I would be looking for in a stock.
_________________ "Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari
Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246
|
Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:57 am |
|
|