Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Apple 'wins' legal case against Samsung 
Author Message
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Samsung ordered to pay Apple over $1bn

Needless to say, Samsung have already announced an appeal.

Jon


Sat Aug 25, 2012 7:20 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
In other news - Apple wins patent for appealing against software patent judgements!

More seriously, how will this affect the ruling in this country that requires Apple to post "Samsung didn't copy us" notices on their website and adverts?

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:31 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:46 pm
Posts: 10022
Reply with quote
I was actually rooting for Samsung. Disappointment.

_________________
Image
He fights for the users.


Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:39 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
In other news - Apple wins patent for appealing against software patent judgements!
More seriously, how will this affect the ruling in this country that requires Apple to post "Samsung didn't copy us" notices on their website and adverts?

Not in the slightest. There's no reason whatsoever the US and UK courts to have to agree.

cloaked_wolf wrote:
I was actually rooting for Samsung. Disappointment.

I find the idea of 'rooting for' a vast megacorporation slightly odd. Especially one like Samsung. They're not very nice people, to put it bluntly.

Jon


Last edited by jonbwfc on Sat Aug 25, 2012 12:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:48 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
I've not looked into the ins and outs of everything in the case and cannot be bothered, and I have not seen or used a tablet from either company up close. But the cynic in me asks what the verdict would have been if Apple had been Korean, and Samsung an American based company.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:57 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
I've not looked into the ins and outs of everything in the case and cannot be bothered, and I have not seen or used a tablet from either company up close. But the cynic in me asks what the verdict would have been if Apple had been Korean, and Samsung an American based company.

It's more to do with which court it's in rather than the nationality of either plaintiff. IMO, if you'd swapped sides but kept the arguments exactly the same, Samsung would have won instead. You could argue Apple had an advantage given it was their 'home ground' and therefore they were more familiar as to how the legal game is played but it's not at all as cut and dried as 'the American guys win'.

Jon


Sat Aug 25, 2012 12:04 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
Didn't Samsung get the opportunity to vet the jury pre-trial?

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Sat Aug 25, 2012 12:26 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm
Posts: 5159
Location: /dev/tty0
Reply with quote
While I'm not saying the patent system is perfect, or even right, I acknowledge that it is there. The rules state that you don't violate someone else's patent. So don't, else face the consequences...


Sat Aug 25, 2012 1:53 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
cloaked_wolf wrote:
I was actually rooting for Samsung. Disappointment.

+1

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Sat Aug 25, 2012 3:32 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
I can't help thinking that if both companies worked together instead if bickering like this, we'd have more awesome toys to play with than we do now.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Sat Aug 25, 2012 4:23 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:44 pm
Posts: 4860
Reply with quote
Quote:
Apple and Samsung get South Korea bans

A South Korean court has ruled that Apple and Samsung both infringed each other's patents on mobile devices.
The court imposed a limited ban on national sales of products by both companies covered by the ruling.
It ruled that US-based Apple had infringed two patents held by Samsung, while the Korean firm had violated one of Apple's patents.
The decision comes as a jury in California is deliberating on a patent trial between the two firms in the US.
The sales ban will apply to Apple's iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4 and its tablets the iPad and iPad 2.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-19364875

a better decision when both sides are claiming and/or disputing patent claims
ban them both from making sales, it might direct their endeavours away from the courts ...

_________________
Hope this helps . . . Steve ...

Nothing known travels faster than light, except bad news ...
HP Pavilion 24" AiO. Ryzen7u. 32GB/1TB M2. Windows 11 Home ...


Sat Aug 25, 2012 7:51 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:10 pm
Posts: 1057
Reply with quote
So a US Jury finds in favour of a US company - now there's a shock :lol:

Apple is becoming a not very nice company - if they can't bring out a better product than their rivals then they just try to sue them out the market :evil:

Reminds me of Microsoft in the bad old days.

_________________
Image


Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:06 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
Exactly what I think.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:38 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
MrStevenRogers wrote:
a better decision when both sides are claiming and/or disputing patent claims
ban them both from making sales, it might direct their endeavours away from the courts ...

I agree. :shock:

_________________
Jim

Image


Sat Aug 25, 2012 10:40 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
I agree, the Korea case was the right resolution. Bang their heads together and take their toys away. Then maybe, just maybe, they will play nice in the future.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Sun Aug 26, 2012 5:55 am
Profile ICQ
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.