x404.co.uk http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/ |
|
Jet crash lands at San Francisco airport http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=19338 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | pcernie [ Sat Jul 06, 2013 7:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Jet crash lands at San Francisco airport |
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-23214513 |
Author: | Amnesia10 [ Sat Jul 06, 2013 9:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jet crash lands at San Francisco airport |
A good thing that nearly all survived. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk. |
Author: | l3v1ck [ Sun Jul 07, 2013 4:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jet crash lands at San Francisco airport |
I know they found and fixed the design flaw from BA038, but my firts though when I saw that was "Do they have RR or GE engines?". |
Author: | Amnesia10 [ Wed Jul 17, 2013 4:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jet crash lands at San Francisco airport |
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wor ... lot-names/ |
Author: | l3v1ck [ Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jet crash lands at San Francisco airport |
How did they not see that joke when they tried to confirm the names. I've got to feel sorry for Boeing. The first passenger fatality on a 777 and it wasn't even the plane's fault (or so the evidence so far suggests). |
Author: | Amnesia10 [ Thu Jul 18, 2013 3:03 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Jet crash lands at San Francisco airport | |||||||||
Apparently they rang the NTSB for confirmation and got a summer intern. He confirmed the names. ![]() |
Author: | l3v1ck [ Thu Jul 18, 2013 3:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jet crash lands at San Francisco airport |
That's my point. How can you not hear the joke when you say the names out loud, as you would on a phone call. |
Author: | Amnesia10 [ Thu Jul 18, 2013 4:19 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Jet crash lands at San Francisco airport | |||||||||
It was probably sent by fax or email. |
Author: | Amnesia10 [ Tue Jul 23, 2013 1:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jet crash lands at San Francisco airport |
Local Newscast Uses DMCA to Erase Air Crash Reporting Blunder |
Author: | jonbwfc [ Tue Jul 23, 2013 11:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jet crash lands at San Francisco airport |
737 undercarriage collapses on landing Boeing's Engineering team receive the news.. ![]() |
Author: | big_D [ Tue Jul 23, 2013 11:51 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Jet crash lands at San Francisco airport | |||||||||
To be fair, that model has been in service for over 35 years. I'm no Boeing apologist, but until the investigation is complete, this could be down to a tyre problem or poor servicing and maintenance on the part of the airline - given the tight margins they have to live, that isn't too far fetched... |
Author: | l3v1ck [ Tue Jul 23, 2013 11:58 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Jet crash lands at San Francisco airport | |||||||||
Na, there'd never be that many there. They all out and about trying to stop 787's spontaniously combusting. |
Author: | JohnSheridan [ Tue Jul 23, 2013 12:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jet crash lands at San Francisco airport |
Glad I booked with Virgin Atlantic now instead of Delta re. Boston Trip as Delta use the 737 whereas VA use the Airbus |
Author: | l3v1ck [ Tue Jul 23, 2013 12:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jet crash lands at San Francisco airport |
Airbus A320 series have had their nose gear issues too. I'd still take the A320 over a 737. Slightly wider seats, especially on the front few rows where 737's start to narrow the cabin width. |
Author: | Amnesia10 [ Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jet crash lands at San Francisco airport |
Generally aircraft are still significantly safer per passenger mile than almost any other form of transport. The bigger factor is the airline you are flying on rather than the aircraft. Many airlines are slowly replacing older aircraft with more efficient new models. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |